|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| GeoGebra software has been identified as a potential aid in the teaching and learning process. This study aims to examine the impact of GeoGebra software on achievement and enjoyment in the context of the polygon topic. A non-equivalent group pretest-posttest design was utilized, and 60 students were randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. The data collected was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods with the assistance of SPSS version 26. The findings revealed that the level of achievement and engagement among Form Two students in the study population was already high regarding the Polygon topic. How-ever, the results demonstrated that students who received instruction utilizing GeoGebra soft-ware achieved even higher levels of achievement and engagement than those who experienced traditional teaching methods. As a result, integrating GeoGebra software into the classroom proved to be an effective tool for enhancing student achievement and engagement on the Poly-gon topic among Form Two students. Finally, we found a significant relationship between the experience of enjoyment and the academic performance of second-year students. (2023), (Universiti Putra Malaysia). All Rights Reserved. |
| References |
J. L. Adelson & D. B. McCoach (2011). Development and psychometric properties of the math and me survey. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(4), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175611418522. M. A. Alkhateeb & A. M. Al-Duwairi (2019). The effect of using mobile applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the students’ achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754. L. W. Anderson & D. R. Krathwohl (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objective. Addison Wesley Longman, New York, NY. H. Asikainen, J. H. Nieminen, J. Häsä & N. Katajavuori (2022). University students’ interest and burnout profiles and their relation to approaches to learning and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 93, Article ID: 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102105. B. Awaji (2022). Students’perceptions of using GeoGebra software in mathematics learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 7(2), 161–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v7i2.4509. A. F. M. Ayub, M. Z. Mokhtar, W. S. Luan & R. A. Tarmizi (2010). A comparison of two different technologies tools in tutoring Calculus. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.048. K. A. Bakar, A. F. M. Ayub, R. A. Tarmizi & W. S. Luan (2015). Effect of teaching mathematics using GeoGebra on students’ with dissimilar spatial visualisation. In AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 1682 pp. Article ID: 030006. AIP Publishing LLC, American Institute of Physics (AIP). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932469. N. A. Bakar, A. F. M. Ayub, N. A. Ahmad & S. I. S. S. Abdullah (2021). Student engagement as the factor of math mastery in university: The relationship between the social factor and learning practices. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 2190–2203. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.4825. S. A. Bakar, N. R. Salim, A. F. M. Ayub & K. Gopal (2021). Success indicators of mathematical problem-solving performance among malaysian matriculation students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter. 20.3.7. O. Birgin & A. Hatice (2022). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning using GeoGebra software on 11th grade students’ mathematics achievement in exponential and logarithmic functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(4), 872–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1788186. O. Birgin & F. Topuz (2021). Effect of the GeoGebra software-supported collaborative learning environment on seventh-grade students’ geometry achievement, retention and attitudes. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(5), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1983505. R. Capuno, R. Necesario, J. O. Etcuban, R. Espina, G. Padillo & R. Manguilimotan (2019). Attitudes, study habits, and academic performance of junior high school students in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5768. Y. Celen (2020). Student opinions on the use of GeoGebra software in mathematics teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(4), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5768. Y. P. Chua (2015). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan. Mc Graw-Hill, Malaysia 2nd edition. J. Cohen (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York 2nd edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587. P. Darmawan & I. N. Parta (2020). The levels of students’ feeling of rightness (FOR) in solving polygon perimeter problems. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13238a. S. S. Davidson, J. R. Keebler, T. Zhang, B. Chaparro, J. Szalma & C. M. Frederick (2023). The development and validation of a universal enjoyment measure: The enjoy scale. Current Psychology, 42(1), 17733–17745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02967-6. A. F. Fauzi & M. F. N. L. Abdullah (2021). Construction of a polygon kit as a teaching aid in the topic of basic polygons form one: Pembinaan kit poligon sebagai bahan bantu mengajar dalam topik poligon asas tingkatan satu. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(1), 88–94. K. Gopal, N. R. Salim & A. F. M. Ayub (2020). Study on mathematics self-efficacy and anxiety among malaysian upper secondary students using fuzzy conjoint analysis. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 14(S), 63–79. N. A. H. Hamzah & R. Hidayat (2022). The role of GeoGebra software in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 12(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol12.1.3.2022. N. C. Hat, S. H. Sha’ari & M. F. A. Hamid (2013). Persepsi pelajar terhadap penggunaan animasi dalam pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Jurnal Teknologi (Social Sciences), 63(1), 25–29. R. Hidayat, H. Qudratuddarsi, N. H. Mazlan & M. Z. M. Zeki (2021). Evaluation of a test measuring mathematical modelling competency for indonesian college students. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss2pp133-155. R. Hidayat & Y. Wardat (2023). A systematic review of augmented reality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12157-x. R. Hidayat, S. N. A. S. Zamri, H. Zulnaidi, M. F. N. L. Abdullah & M. Adnan (2021). The interrelationships between metacognition and modeling competency: The moderating role of the academic year. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1853–1866. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1853. T. Kabaca, M. Aktümen, Y. Aksoy & M. Bulut (2010). Introducing the in-service mathematics teachers with the dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra and their views about GeoGebra. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 148–165. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |