Factors affecting teachers integration of visualization technology in geometry: PLS-SEM analysis

Faridah Hanim Yahya

Abstract

Visualization is identified as a crucial element that affects students performance in Geometry. Technology plays an important role to assist weak students in visualizing concepts in Geometry. Teachers need proper planning in teaching to help their students in understanding the concepts. This study used partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypotheses to verify the effects of variables on teachers intention of integrating visualization technology in teaching geometry. The model consists of four constructs: teaching strategy, teaching activity, selection of media, tools and teaching aids, and assessment. The research instrument consisted of 30 survey questions for four main constructs: teaching strategy, teaching activity, selection of media, tools, and teaching aids and assessment. The questionnaires were distributed to 180 teachers who teach Mathematics in secondary schools. The study used a PLS-SEM modeling tool to analyze data for reliability and validity. Results show that teaching strategy, teaching activity, selection of media, tools and teaching aids, and assessment significantly influence the integration of visualization technology in Geometry. This finding is a reference for policymakers and implementers to improve the quality of teaching and learning in Geometry for secondary schools. 2023, World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society. All rights reserved.

References

H. Crompton, M. R. Grant, and K. Y. H. Shraim, Technologies to enhance and extend children’s understanding of geometry: A configurative thematic synthesis of the literature, Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2018, pp. 59–69.

M. Kmetová, and Z. Nagyová Lehocká, Using tangram as a manipulative tool for transition between 2D and 3D perception in geometry. Mathematics, Vol. 9, No.18, 2021, assist students pp. 2185.

K. Gravemeijer, M. Stephan, C. Julie, F. L. Lin, and M. Ohtani, What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 15, 2017, pp. 105-123.

National report TIMSS 2019, trends in international mathematics and science study. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education, 2020. Laporan kebangsaan TIMSS 2019, trends in international mathematics and science study. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2020. https://www.moe.gov.my/muatturun/penerbitan-dan-jurnal/rujukanakademik/3918-buku-laporan-timss-2019/file

A. Muhamad, S. Murtono, and Y. Gui, The effect of manipulative pbl model on the understanding mathematic concepts for elementary students, Asian Pendidikan, Vol.1, No. 2, 2021, pp. 17-22.

D. Mavani, B. Mavani, and M. Schäfer, A case study of two selected teachers as they integrated dynamic geometry software as a visualization tool in teaching geometry, African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2018, pp. 297-307.

O. L. Ng, L. Shi, and F. S. Ting, Exploring differences in primary students' geometry learning outcomes in two technology- enhanced environments: Dynamic geometry and 3d printing, International Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020.

M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, and P. Mishra, (Eds.), Handbook of Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 2016.

Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education, 2012. Pelan pembangunan pendidikan malaysia (PPPM) 2013 – 2025. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2012. https://www.moe.gov.my/dasarmenu/pelanpembangunan-pendidikan-2013-2025

Assessment and standard curriculum document for mathematics. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education, 2017. Matematik. dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2017. https://www.moe.gov.my/wargakpm/pegawai-perkhidmatan-pendidikan/dskp

Selkirk, K., Seeing and Believing: Examining the role of visualization technology in decision-making about the future. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Arizona State University, 2019. ASU Library, Available at: from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertationstheses/seeing-believing-examining-rolevisualization/docview/2295516416/se-2 (Accessed: 20th June 2022).

T. K. Tee, A. Ramlan, M. N. A.Azman, N. R. P. A. Bagus, R. Sukardi, & R. I. Abd Hamid, Mastery issues and teaching approaches for the electrical technology certificate programme at community colleges on the topic of measuring instruments, Asian Pendidikan, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2022, pp. 1-7.

C. C. Meng, and N. Idris, Assessment of preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ van hiele levels of geometric thinking, Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, Vol.2, 2012, pp. 60-74.

L. H. L.Lian, W. T. Yew, and N. Idris, Assessing a hierarchy of pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ algebraic thinking, Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 1, 2011, pp. 38-51.

R. B. Armah, and P. S. Kissi, Use of the van hiele theory in investigating teaching strategies used by college of education geometry tutors, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2019.

Z., Usiskin, Chicago Univ., I., Van hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry. CDASSG Project, 1982.

van Hiele. The child’s thought and geometry, trans. by R. Tischler, Bulletin de l’association Des Professeurs de Mathematique de l’enseignment Public, Vol. 38e, No. 198, 1956, pp. 1–10.

M. L. Crowley, The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Learning and teaching geometry, K-12. In Lindquist, M. M., eds, Learning and teaching geometry, K-12, 1987 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 9-24, Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1987.

F. H. Yahya, G. K. Kassymova, W. Murtafiah, and S. Suparman, Experts and designated users evaluations on visual tools screencast SketchUp Make (ViToS-SUM), Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania. Perspectives of Science and Education, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2021, pp. 460-472. [Penilaian pakar dan pengguna utama terhadap alatan visual menggunakan teknik screencast dan perisian SkecthUp Make (ViToS-SUM) ].

S. Smith, and K. Talley, 'Lend a hand' project helps students: Improved spatial visualization skills through engaging in hands-on 3-D printed prosthetics project during a 9th grade engineering course, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2018.

P. Sarkar, K. Kadam, and J. S. Pillai, Learners' approaches, motivation and patterns of problem-solving on lines and angles in geometry using augmented reality, Smart Learning Environments, Vol. 7, 2020, pp. 1-23.

O. Disbudak, and D. Akyuz, The Comparative Effects of Concrete Manipulates and Dynamic Software on the Geometry Achievement of Fifth-Grade Students. International journal for technology in mathematics education, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2019.

M. C. Gürbüz, M. Ağsu, and H. K. Güler, Investigating geometric habits of mind by using paper folding, Acta Didactica Napocensia, Vol. 11, No. 3-4, 2018, pp. 157-174.