Study on the influence of Chinese traditional culture on corporate environmental responsibility

Huat, Khor Teik

Abstract

In accordance with the theory of informal institutions, culture exerts a crucial influence on the enactment of corporate social responsibility. Based on the two core variables of Chinese traditional culture and corporate environmental responsibility, we designed a panel data model to investigate the impact of Chinese traditional culture on corporate environmental responsibility and its heterogeneity. The findings indicate the following: 1) Chinese traditional culture can promote the performance of corporate environmental responsibility. 2) Chinese traditional culture has a heterogeneous influence on the environmental responsibility of enterprises that depends on the ownership difference of enterprises; that is, the influence of traditional culture on the environmental responsibility of state-owned enterprises is stronger than that of non-state-owned enterprises. 3) Chinese traditional culture has a heterogeneous influence on the environmental responsibility of enterprises according to the difference in industrial pollution levels; that is, traditional culture has a positive correlation with the environmental responsibility of enterprises in heavily polluting industries and a negative correlation with non-heavily polluting industries. 4) Chinese traditional culture has a heterogeneous influence on corporate environmental responsibility according to geographical differences; that is to say, traditional culture promotes the development of corporate environmental responsibility in the central and western regions, and vice versa in the eastern regions. 2023 the Author(s)

References

J. McGee, Commentary on ‘corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework’ by AM Rugman and A. Verbeke, Strat. Mgmt, 19 (1998), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<377::AID-SMJ988>3.0.CO;2-S

G. C. Reid, J. A. Smith; Y. L. Hsu, Choices of financial reporting regimes and techniques and underlying decision-making processes: a case study analysis of a port authority, Natl. Account. Rev., 3 (2021), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.3934/nar.2021007

Z. H. Li, Z. M. Huang, Y. Y. Su, New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation: Evidence from China, Energy Econ., 119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545

Z. Li, H. Chen, B. Mo, Can digital finance promote urban innovation? Evidence from China, Borsa Istanbul Rev., 23 (2023), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.10.006

S. Huang, K. T. Huat, Z. F. Zhou, The studies on Chinese traditional culture and corporate environmental responsibility: literature review and its implications, Natl. Account. Rev., 4 (2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3934/nar.2022001

G. Liu, L. Guo, Empirical study on the relationship between environmental regulation, environmental responsibility and green innovation—taking green image as the moderating variable, Sci. Manage. Res., 37 (2019), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.19445/j.cnki.15-1103/g3.2019.04.001

Z. Li, C. Yang, Z. Huang, How does the fintech sector react to signals from central bank digital currencies, Finance Res. Lett., 50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103308

Y. Liu, P. Failler, Z. Y. Liu, Impact of environmental regulations on energy efficiency: A case study of China’s air pollution prevention and control action plan, Sustainability, 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063168

S. Y. Ren, H. T. Wu, Path to green development: the role environmental regulation and labor skill premium on green total factor energy efficiency, Green Finance, 4 (2022), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2022019

Y. Liu, L. M. Chen, L. T. Lv, P. Failler, The impact of population aging on economic growth: a case study on China, Aims Math., 8 (2023), 10468–10485. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023531

C. Marquis, C. L. Qian, Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance, Organ. Sci., 25 (2014), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837

M. Abdullah, M. A. F. Chowdhury, U. Karmaker, M. H. R. Fuszder, M. A. Shahriar, Role of the dynamics of political stability in firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh, Quant. Finance Econ., 6 (2022), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2022022

J. Lu, J. Wang, Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective, J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money, 70 (2021), 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101264

S. M. Adnan, D. Hay, C. J. van Staden, The influence of culture and corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure: A cross country analysis, J. Cleaner Prod., 198 (2018), 820–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.057

J. Kim, S. J. Daniel, Religion and corporate governance: Evidence from 32 Countries, Asia-Pac. J. Financ. Stud., 45 (2016), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12130

C. Tsendsuren, P. L. Yadav, S. Kim, S. Han, The effects of managerial competency and local religiosity on corporate environmental responsibility, Sustainability, 13 (2021), 5857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115857

I. Gallego-Alvarez, E. Ortas, Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: A quantile regression approach, Int. Bus. Rev., 26 (2017), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.003

M. L. Gallen, C. Peraita, The effects of national culture on corporate social responsibility disclosure: a cross-country comparison, Appl. Econ., 50 (2018), 2967–2979. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1412082

A. B. Pinheiro, M. C. Oliveira, M. B. Lozano, The effects of national culture on environmental disclosure: A cross-country analysis, Rev. Contabilidade Finanças, 34 (2023), e1636. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20221636.en

J. Graafland, N. Noorderhaven, National culture and environmental responsibility research revisited, Int. Bus. Rev., 27 (2018), 958–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.006