Design factors of potential assistive technology for memorizing Al-Quran learning experience among tahfiz students

Ronaldi Saleh Umar

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	T Technology (General)
ISSN :	1823-7231
Main Author :	Ronaldi Saleh Umar
Title :	Design factors of potential assistive technology for memorizing Al-Quran learning experience among tahfiz students

Place of Production :	Tanjung Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Seni, Kelestarian dan Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :	2023
Notes :	Alam Cipta
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link :	Click to view web link

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

In common practice of al-Quran memorization, Tahfiz students spend up to eight hours daily to memorize al-Quran. Many things can happen within those eight hours, affecting their learning experience and performance. This research paper was conducted to investigate the design factors and to suggest a model of potential assistive technology for memorizing al-Quran among Tahfiz students. Qualitative method of case study was used. Two well-experienced teachers were interviewed through focus group discussion. Verbatim transcript of the interview was transcribed and keywords were identified. To analyse the data, the researchers identified themes for further exploration. The results were validated by two experienced inter-raters. The findings indicated nine themes that were classified into three categories: (1) Factors before memorizing al-Quran, (2) Factors during memorizing al-Quran, and (3) Factors after memorizing al-Quran. The research finding suggests the assistive technology that can be planned for further research development and testing. 2023, Alam Cipta. All Rights Reserved.

References

Ab Jalil, N., Salleh, N. H., Awang, A. H., Ab Jalil, H., Salim, S. S., & Chek, Y. (2021). Experiential Qur’anic Learnings: Enriching Hafazan by Exploring Multitude of Environmental Based Responses. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Construction Management, 11(1).

Al-Dababneh, K. A., & Al-Zboon, E. K. (2020). Using assistive technologies in the curriculum of children with specific learning disabilities served in inclusion settings: teachers’ beliefs and professionalism. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1-11.

Alhojailan, M. I. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation.

Al-Nawawi, Abu Zakaria Yahya. (2012). Etiquette With the Quran (At-Tibyan fi Adab Hamalat al-Qur an). (F. Musa, Trans). Kuala Lumpur: Islamosaic.

Ariffin, S., Abdullah, M., & Ahmad, K. (2014). Implementation of Othman Method on Memorization the Quran: A Study in Sulaymaniyyah Institute, Malaysia. Katalog B P S , XXXIII(2), 81–87

Ariffin, S., Abdullah, M., Suliaman, I., Ahmad, K., Deraman, F., Ahmad Shah, F., Mohd Yusoff, M. Y. Z., Abd Razzak, M. M., Mohd Noor. M. M., Meftah, J. T., Kasar, A. K., Amir, S. & Mohd Nor, M. R. (2013). Effective techniques of memorizing the Quran: a study a Madrasah Tahfiz Alquran, Terengganu, Malaysia. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13(1), 45-48.

Awang, A. H. (2019). Physical learning ecosystem and built environment of Tahfiz institutions in Malaysia: a systematic review. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Construction Management, 9(2).

Aziz, M., Abdullah, W. M., Ahmad, A. M., Mushim, M. A. A., & Shahrudin, M. S. (2019). Comparison between Conventional Method and Modern Technology in Al-Qur’an Memorization. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng, 8(1), 289-294.

Azmil Hashim, Ab. HalimTamuri, Misnan Jemali, Aderi Che Noh. (2014). Kaedah Pembelajaran Tahfiz dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Hafazan Pelajar. Journal of Al-Quran and Tarbiyyah, Vol 1(1) 2014:9-16

Azmil, H. (2013). Latar Belakang Guru Tahfiz dan Amalan Kaedah Pengajaran Tahfiz Al- Quran di Malaysia. The Online Journal of Islamic Education. Vol. 1, Issue 1

Chawana, T., & Adebesin, F. (2021). The current state of measuring return on investment in user experience design. South African Computer Journal, 33(1), 22-36.

Gill, P., & Baillie, J. (2018). Interviews and focus groups in qualitative research: an update for the digital age. British dental journal, 225(7), 668-672.

Hashim, A. (2017a). Hubungan antara adab-adab pembelajaran Tahfiz dan pencapaian hafazan pelajar. O-JIE: Online Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2).

Hashim, A. (2017b). Latar belakang guru Tahfiz dan amalan kaedah pengajaran Tahfiz al- Quran di Malaysia. O-JIE: Online Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1).

Jalil, N. A., binti Zainudin, F. E., Salleh, N. H., Awang, A. H., Jalil, H. A., & Salim, S. S. (2020, May). Linking Place Preference with Satisfaction: An Examination of its R e l a t i o n s h i p from Tahfiz Students Perspective. In International Research Conference on Social Sciences (3rd IRCSS 2020) (p. 149).

Jeffries, N., Zaslavsky, A. M., Diez Roux, A. V., Creswell, J. W., Palmer, R. C., Gregorich, S. E., ... & Breen, N. (2019). Methodological approaches to understanding causes of health disparities. American journal of public health, 109(S1), S28-S33.

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), 846-854.

Morris, J. A. (2021). Enhancing industrial design education with user experience design. Education Papers, Industrial Designers Society of America. https://www.idsa.org/sites/default/files/Enhancing% 20ID% 20Education. pdf. Accessed, 12.

Lin, C. J., & Cheng, L. Y. (2017). Product attributes and user experience design: how to convey product information through user-centered service. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(7), 1743-1754.

Magaldi, D., & Berler, M. (2020). Semi-structured interviews. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 4825-4830.

Mustafa, N. M., & Basri, M. (2014). Perbandingan kaedah hafazan al-Quran tradisional dan moden: Satu kajian awal. Proceedings of the Social Sciences Research, 827-834.

Nik M.S, A. N. A, Fathiyah, S. M. S., and Rabi’atul, A. M. I. (2018). Challenges Facing School Students in Qur’an Memorization: A Qualitative Study

Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books.

Pramod, D. (2022). Assistive technology for elderly people: state of the art review and future research agenda. Science & Technology Libraries, 1-34.

Peng, Q., & Martens, J. B. (2018). Requirements gathering for tools in support of storyboarding in user experience design.

Renz, S. M., Carrington, J. M., & Badger, T. A. (2018). Two strategies for qualitative content analysis: An intramethod approach to triangulation. Qualitative health research, 28(5), 824-831.

Smith, R. O., Scherer, M. J., Cooper, R., Bell, D., Hobbs, D. A., Pettersson, C., ... & Bauer, S. (2018). Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 473-485. The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed). Aarhus, Denmark: The interaction design foundation. http://www.interactiondesign.org/encyclopedia/semistructured_qualitative_studies. html

Tosi, F. (2020). Cognitive Aspects in User Experience Design: From Perception to Emotions. In Design for Ergonomics (pp. 281-294). Springer, Cham.

Wang, X., Mayer, R. E., Han, M., & Zhang, L. (2022). Two Emotional Design Features Are More Effective Than One in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 07356331221090845.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page