UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Pedagogical practices with high quality could affect students positively. In recent years, pedagogy in education is learner-centric or teacher-centric. Accordingly, different pedagogical approaches have been used by various traditional studies with an aim of creating an effective education system. Hence, this study intends to comprehensively examine various recent pedagogical practices to find its impact on students. It also attempts to discuss pedagogical statistics in global viewpoint and assess distinct approaches for teaching and learning. The study has also reviewed the Malaysian perspective regarding the pedagogical practices. Finally, it discusses the innovations to be employed in future for an effective education. Various teaching and learning styles are explored which could be opted by educators that suits them, and also employ the learning methods to students based on their ability. Innovations to be made in future pedagogy is also described that could serve as a guideline for researchers to focus for further implementation. 2023 Authors. All rights reserved. |
| References |
Avidov-Ungar, O., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2018). Professional identity of teacher educators in the digital era in light of demands of pedagogical innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 183–191. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.017 Banerjee, R., & Seshaiyer, P. (2019). Challenges in school mathematics curriculum reform in India: transforming teacher practices through pedagogical innovations. School Mathematics Curricula. Springer. Banerji, R., & Chavan, M. (2016). Improving literacy and math instruction at scale in India’s primary schools: The case of pratham’s read india program. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 453–475. doi:10.1007/s10833-016-9285-5 Benson, I. T. J. S., & Kiyasudeen, E. R. J. M. (2020). Virtual reality-a paradigm shift in education pedagogy. Seventh International Conference on Information Technology. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 Bonnaud, O., & Fesquet, L. (2016). Practice in microelectronics education as a mandatory supplement to the future digital-based pedagogy: strategy of the french national network. Paper presented at the 11th European Workshop on Microelectronics Education (EWME). Europe. doi:10.1109/EWME.2016.7496460 Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2017). Rethinking the relationship between pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education. Sport Education and Society, 22(2), 288–304. doi:10.1080/13573322.2016.1226792 Chieng, Y. E., & Tan, C. K. (2021). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Malaysian science teachers‟ survey and perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology (IJIET), 11(5), 235–241. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1517 Daniela, L. (2019). Smart pedagogy for technology-enhanced learning. Didactics of Smart Pedagogy. Springer. Emami, M. R., Bazzocchi, M. C., & Hakima, H. (2020). Engineering design pedagogy: A performance analysis. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(3), 553–585. doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09515-7 Freitas, A., & Paredes, J. (2018). Understanding the faculty perspectives influencing their innovative practices in MOOCs/SPOCs: A case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–13. doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0086-6 Giordano, N. A., Compton, P., Joseph, P. V., Romano, C. A., Piano, M. R., & Naylor, M. D. (2021). Opportunities and challenges presented by recent pedagogical innovations in doctoral nursing education. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(1), 228–234. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.09.003 PMID:33674100 Guay, F., Gilbert, W., Falardeau, É., Bradet, R., & Boulet, J. (2020). Fostering the use of pedagogical practices among teachers to support elementary students’ motivation to write. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101922. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101922 Hanifah, M., Mohmadisa, H., Yazid, S., Nasir, N., & Balkhis, N. S. (2019). Professional and pedagogical competencies of geography teachers in malaysia. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 9(2), 304–318. doi:10.33403/rigeo.509836 Jamaludin, K., Alias, N., DeWitt, D., & Ibrahim, M. (2020). Technical communication pedagogical model (TCPM) for malaysian vocational colleges. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–13. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00597-6 Jeong, K.-O. (2017). Preparing EFL student teachers with new technologies in the korean context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 488–509. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1321554 Jumanovich, T. A., & Eshboevna, T. D. (2019). Features of basic methodological approaches in pedagogy. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 7(12). Kearney, M., Burden, K., & Schuck, S. (2019). Disrupting education using smart mobile pedagogies. Didactics of Smart Pedagogy. Springer. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |