Antioxidant potential of different parts of three pineapple varieties N36, Madu and MD2

Wan Zuraida Wan Mohd Zain

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	QK Botany RB Pathology
Main Author :	Wan Zuraida Wan Mohd Zain
Additional Authors :	Nur Diyana Zulpahmi Nur Fatin Nadzirah Zukaimi Siti Aisha Naí’lla Che Musa Nur ‘Amira Hamid Nurul Wahida Ramli
Title :	Antioxidant potential of different parts of three pineapple varieties N36, Madu and MD2

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2023
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Pineapple (Ananas comosus) is widely consumed and appreciated not only due to its taste and aroma and to its nutritional and antioxidant properties, including its vitamin C and phenolic contents. In an attempt to explore new antioxidant leads, pineapple waste is often neglected in the pineapple industry. Fruit processing has considerably higher ratios of by-products and pineapple by-products are not exceptions as they consist basically of the residual pulp, peels, stem, and leaves. Pineapple waste is a by-product resulting from canning processing of pineapple that produces about 35% of fruit waste and leads to serious environmental pollution. The objective of this study is to determine whether different varieties and parts of pineapple waste (peel, core, crown, and stalk) can affect and give the highest amount of natural antioxidant activity. In this study, the antioxidant activities of different parts of three pineapples (N36, Madu, and MD2 were measured using the DPPH method. Methanol solvent has been used for extraction and various parts of pineapple were used to determine the effect of different plants on antioxidants. The samples were determined by using an ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer. The result for scavenging activity (DPPH) indicates Madu variety displayed high scavenging activity compared to MD2 and N36 varieties. Madu varieties demonstrated a significant free radical scavenging ability where their crown has IC50 and cores are merely IC50 at 175 ppm and 500ppm. The MD2 crown also demonstrates IC50 at 275 ppm. The results suggest that Madu varieties comprised of the crown of pineapple studied may be useful as potential sources of natural antioxidants. Keywords: Pineapple; antioxidant; N36; Madu; MD2

References

Abbas AD, Mohammad AE, Nabavi SF, Nabavi SM. (2009). Antioxidant activity of the methanol extract of Ferula assafoetida and its essential oil composition, Grasas y Aceites, 60(4), 405-412.

Adhikarimayum H, Kshetrimayumet G, Maibam D. (2010). Evaluation of antioxidant properties of phenolics extracted from Ananas comosus L., Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2, 68.

Ahmad A, Nurhalim MS. (2012). Antioxidants activity in pineapple CV.n36 culture under aluminium stress, Malaysian Applied Biology, 41(1), 23-28.

Alothman M, Bhat R, Karim AA. (2009). Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of selected tropical fruits from Malaysia, extracted with different solvents, Food Chemistry, 115, 785-788.

Bag G, Devi PG, Bhaigyabati T. (2015). Assessment of total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of methanolic rhizome extract of three Hedychium species of Manipur valley, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 30(1), 154-159.

Bhattacharjee R, Dey U. (2014). Biofertilizer, a way towards organic agriculture: a review. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 8(24), 2332-2343

Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity, LWT - Food Science and Technology, 28(1), 25-30.

Carr A, Frei B. (1999). Does vitamin C act as a pro-oxidant under physiological conditions? Faseb Journal, 13(9), 1007-1024.

da Silva DIS, Nogueira GDR, Duzzioni AG, Barrozo MAS. (2013). Changes of antioxidant constituents in pineapple (Ananas comosus) residue during drying process, Industrial Crops and Products, 50, 557-562.

Ding P, Syazwani S. (2016). Physicochemical quality, antioxidant compounds and activity of MD-2 pineapple fruit at five ripening stages. International Food Research Journal, 23, 549-555.

Hassan SA, Mijin S, Yusoff UK, Ding P, Wahab PEM. (2012). Nitrate, ascorbic acid, mineral and antioxidant activities of Cosmos caudatus in response to organic and mineral-based fertilizer rates. Molecules, 17(7), 7843-7853.

Hikal WM, Mahmoud AA, Said-Al Ahl HAH, Bratovcic A, Tkachenko KG, Kacaniova M, Rodriguez RM. (2021). Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.), waste streams, characterisation and valorisation: an overview. Open Journal of Ecology, 11(9), 610-634.

Hossain MA, Rahman SM. (2011). Total phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant activity of tropical fruit pineapple, Food Research International, 44(3), 672-676.

Jaji K, Man N, Nawi N. (2018). Factors affecting pineapple market supply in Johor, Malaysia. International Food Research Journal, 25(1), 366-375.

Jovanovic M, Milutinovic M, Kostic M, Miladinovic B, Kitic N, Brankovic S, Kitic D. (2018). Antioxidant capacity of pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) extracts and juice. Lekovite sirovine, 38, 27-30.

Kedare SB, Singh RP. (2011). Genesis and development of DPPH method of antioxidant assay. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 48(4), 412-422.

Li T, Shen P, Liu W, Liu C, Liang R, Yan N, Chen J. (2014) Major polyphenolics in pineapple peels and their antioxidant interactions. International Journal of Food Properties, 17(8), 1805-1817.

Lourenço SC, Moldão-Martins M, Alves VD. (2019). Antioxidants of natural plant origins: from sources to food industry applications. Molecules, 24(22), 4132.

Molyneux P. (2004). The use of stable free radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) for estimating antioxidant activity. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 26, 211-219.

Ranjitham AM, Ranjani GS, Caroling G. (2015). Biosynthesis, characterization, antimicrobial activity of copper nanoparticles using fresh aqueous Ananas comosus L. (Pineapple) extract, International Journal of PharmTech Research, 8, 750-769.

Rashad MM, Mahmoud AE, Ali MM, Nooman MU, Al-Kashef AS. (2015). Antioxidant and anticancer agents produced from pineapple waste by solid state fermentation. International Journal of Toxicological and Pharmacological Research, 7(6), 287-296.

Saraswaty V, Risdian C, Primadona I, Andriyani R, Andayani D, Mozef T. (2017). Pineapple peel wastes as a potential source of antioxidant compounds. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

Selvanathan KY, Sharaani MS, Masngut N. (2020). Factorial analysis on biovinegar production from pineapple waste using mixed strains. Journal of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Biotechnology, 6(1), 32-38.

Suhaimi N, Abdul Fatah F. (2021), An assessment of comparative advantage of pineapple production (Ananas comosus) among smallholders in Johor, Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 757, 12012.

Vald A, Mart D, Landete MP, Moya P, Beltr A. (2021). Potential of industrial pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merrill) by-products as aromatic and antioxidant sources. Antioxidants, 10(11), 1767.

Xu DP, Li Y, Meng X, Zhou T, Zhou Y, Zheng J, Li HB. (2017). Natural antioxidants in foods and medicinal plants: Extraction, assessment and resources. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(1), 96.

Yuris A, Siow LF. (2014). A comparative study of the antioxidant properties of three pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) varieties. Journal of Food Studies, 3(1), 40-56.

Zou Y, Lu Y, Wei D. (2004). Antioxidant activity of a flavonoid-rich extract of Hypericum perforatum L. in vitro. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 5032-5039.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page