UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Nik Muhammad Hanis Nek Rakami
Additional Authors :Muhammad Ihsan Rokeman
Title :Pedagogical approavhes using neoro linguistis programming (NLP) strategies from perspective of NLP ttained teachers
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2023
Corporate Name :Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun

Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
The purpose of this study is to explore how Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) strategies applied by NLP-trained teachers as their pedagogical approaches in teaching and learning. A qualitative research was conducted among secondary school teachers in Malaysia. A total of 7 interviewees were selected. Content analysis and critical discourse analysis on analysing three sources of data collection have been carefully applied. The teachers are NLP practitioners who have been certified by the National Federation of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NFNLP) and NLP Malaysia. This study identifies strategies of NLP that have been applied in the teaching and learning process. The strategies include ‘building rapport’, ‘representational system’, ‘logical level’, ‘Milton Models’, ‘metaphors’ and ‘anchoring’. The findings indicate that NLP is a viable means of teaching and learning practices in the classroom, but it needs flexibility due to the obstacles faced in its practices. This study identifies that NLP is a great tool in empowering teaching skills among teachers. It is also a medium to enhance the teaching and learning process. Therefore, this study proposes more thorough research on the challenges and practices of NLP on teaching and learning in the future. Keywords: NLP, secondary school teachers, pedagogy

References

Badley, Ken and Hollabaugh, Jaliene, "Metaphors for Teaching and Learning" (2012). Faculty Publications - School of Education. Paper 49.

Bandler R., & Grinder, J. (1976). The structure of magic II. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books, Inc.

Bandler, R. & Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs into princes.Moab, UT: Real People Press.

Bandler, R. & Grinder, J. (1982). Reframing: neuro-linguistic programming and the transformation of meaning. Moab, Utah: Real People Press,

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.

Craft, A. (2001). Neuro -linguistic programming and learning theory. The Curriculum Journal, 12(1), 125-136

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (p. 194). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Davis, D. I. and Davis, S. L. (1991) "Belief change and neurolinguistic programming", Family Dynamics of Addiction Quarterly,Vol 1, No. 2, pp.34-44.

Dolnick, K. H. (2006). Neuro-Linguistic applications to classroom management: reach them to teach them. ProQuest.

Glass, G.V, Cahen, L.S, Smith, M.L & Filby, N.N (1982), School class size: Reasearch and Policy

Groton, R. A. (1983). School administration and supervision leadership: Challenges and opportunities. USA, Brown publishers limited. Retrieved March 4, 2014, from www.alibris.com/search/books/isbn/9780697062468

Hallowell, E. M., & Ratey, J. J. (1996). Attention Deficit Disorder: Edward M. Hallowell and John J. Ratey. Fourth Estate.

Pagano, G. (2007). NLP and teenage boredom-dreaming of a class. Humanising Language Teaching, 9(6). Retrieved November 24, 2014, from www.hltmag.co.uk/sep02/ martnov027.rtf

Pilgrims. (2005) Teacher Training- NLP for Teachers www.pilgrims.co.uk/teachers/info/tnp.asp

Schanzenbach, D. W. (2014). Does class size matter. Policy Briefs, National Education Policy Center, School of Education, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Thornbury, S. (2001). The unbearable lightness of EFL. ELT Journal, 55(4), 391-402. WA: Michael Grinder & Associates History of NLP. (n. d.) Retrieved July 27, 2005 from http://www.nlp3.com.uk/history/history.htm..

Tosey, P., & Mathison, J. (2003). Neuro-linguistic programming and learning theory: A response. The Curriculum Journal, 14(3), 371-388.

Tosey, P & Mathison, J. (2005). Mapping transformative learning: The potential of neuro- linguistic programming. Journal of Transformative Education, (2005), 3 (2). 140-157.

Tosey, P. (2006). Bateson’s levels of learning: A framework for transformative learning? Paper presented at Universities‟ Forum for Human Resource Development Conference, University of Tilburg, May 2006. Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016 &context=humresmgmt

Tosey, P., & Mathison, J. (2006). Introducing neuro-linguistic programming. Centre for Management Learning & Development, School of Management, University of Surrey.

Tosey, P. (2008). `It‟s a living thing‟: A neuro-linguistic programming perspective on essay writing. Humanising Language Teaching, 10(5). Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/oct08/mart02.htm

Yemm, G. (2006) "Can NLP help or harm your business?", Industrial and Commercial Training,Vol 38, No. 1, pp.12-17

Yontef, G. (1993). Gestalt Therapy: An Introduction. Retrieved July-15-2005 From: http://www.Gestalt.Org/Yontef.Htm.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.