Kepelbagaian modaliti dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran dwibahasa

Ramli Zuraini,

Abstract

Pengajaran dan pembelajaran secara dwibahasa merupakan satu proses yang kompleks. Selain menggunakan lebih daripada satu bahasa (lisan dan penulisan), proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran juga tidak dapat lari daripada melibatkan kepelbagaian modaliti seperti gerak isyarat, jadual, rajah, dan model tiga dimensi. Kajian ini melihat bagaimana bahasa digunakan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Matematik dan Sains secara dwibahasa, iaitu yang menggunakan bahasa Inggeris (bahasa pengantar) dan bahasa Melayu (bahasa kebangsaan). Fokus kajian adalah peranan kepelbagaian modaliti dalam membantu pengajaran dan pembelajaran dijalankan dengan berkesan. Data diperoleh daripada rakaman video pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam kelas, berserta temu bual dengan guru dan murid, serta pemerhatian di dalam kelas. Data dianalisis menggunakan pakej perisian Transana, khususnya untuk menjana dan meneliti prosedur pengekodan data. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa kepelbagaian modaliti memainkan peranan yang penting dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran dwibahasa, terutamanya dalam mengurangkan tuntutan terhadap penggunaan bahasa kedua yang penguasaannya masih belum mencapai tahap yang memuaskan.

References

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, 131-152. 2. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DEFT: A conceptual framework for learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. 3. Gilbert, J, and Treagust, D. (Eds). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. 4. Gutierrez, K., Sengupta-Irving T., & Dieckmann, J. (2010). Developing a mathematical vision: Mathematics as a discursive and embodied practice. In J. N. Moschkovich (Ed.), Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. 5. Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 5-28. 6. Idris, N., Cheong, L. S., Nor, N. M., Razak, A. Z. A., & Saad, R. M. (2007). The professional preparation of Malaysian teachers in the implementation of teaching and learning of mathematics and science in English. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 101-110. 7. Idris, N., Cheong, L. S., Razak, A. Z. A., Nor, N. M., & Saad, R. M. (2006). Effective implementation of teaching mathematics and science in English: a case study. Jurnal Pendidikan, 26, 101-115. 8. Jewitt, C., Kress, G., Ogborn G., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: the multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educational Review, 53(1). 9. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J.,and Charalampos, T. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum. 10. Lemke, J. L. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 33-47). Newark: International Reading Association and National Science Teachers Association. 11. O'Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London, England: Continuum. 12. Prain, V., Tytler, R., and Peterson, S. (2009). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education. 31 (6), 787-808. 13. Schleppegrell, M. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 139-159. 14. Solomon, Y. (2009). Mathematics literacy: Developing identities of inclusion. New York: Routledge. 15. Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2013). The nature of student learning and knowing in science, in Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber P., and Waldrip, B., (Eds), Constructing representations to learn in science, pp. 153-164, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands. 16. Tytler R, Vaughan, P., Peter, H., and Filocha, H., (2013). Reasoning in science through representation, in Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber P., and Waldrip, B., (Eds), Constructing representations to learn in science, pp. 83-107, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands. 17. Yassin, S. M., Marsh, D., Tek, O. E., & Ying, L. Y. (2009). Learners’ perceptions towards the teaching of science through English in Malaysia: A quantitative analysis. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 54-69.