Validation of energy conservation behaviour for Malaysia university students using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis

Noor Asiah Hassan

QR Code Link :
Type :	Article
Subject :	HD61 Risk Management
Main Author :	Noor Asiah Hassan
Additional Authors :	Dajvinder Singh Rodiah Mohd Hassan
Title :	Validation of energy conservation behaviour for Malaysia university students using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
Hits :	159

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains Kemanusiaan
Year of Publication :	2024
Corporate Name :	Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
PDF Full Text :	You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun

Given the increasing urgency of addressing global environmental challenges, research on energy conservation in educational settings is critical. University students represent a significant demographic with the potential to drive behavioural change and promote sustainable practices. By understanding and influencing their energy conservation behaviours, this research contributes to the broader efforts to mitigate environmental impact and foster a culture of sustainability. This study aims to validate the Environment Conservation Behavioural Survey (ECOBS), an instrument designed to assess university students' behaviours and intentions regarding energy conservation, through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). The ECOBS model integrates five key variables: behaviour, intention, perceived behavioural control, environmental education, and attitude. Initially, a pilot study with 150 respondents was conducted, followed by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using SPSS. Subsequently, primary data were collected from 400 respondents and analysed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in AMOS. The findings confirm that the ECOBS instrument meets the stringent criteria for convergent, construct, and discriminant validity, as well as reliability, demonstrating its robustness in evaluating students' intentions and behaviours towards energy conservation. The validated ECOBS instrument not only identifies key predictors of energy conservation behaviours but also offers practical insights for stakeholders aiming to enhance such behaviours among students. The rigorous validation process underscores the ECOBS instrument's value as a reliable and valid tool for measuring and promoting energy conservation behaviours in educational settings. This instrument can serve as a foundation for future studies, contributing to the development of targeted interventions that foster sustainable behaviours among university students. Keywords: Confirmatory factor analysis, Exploratory factor analysis, Intention, Theory of planned behaviour, Energy Conserving behaviour (ECB)

References

12th Malaysian Plan. (2021). A Prosperous, Inclusive, Sustainable Malaysia. 12th Malaysian Plan.

Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Fazella, S. (2017). Developing the patients' loyalty model for medical tourism industry: The case of Malaysia. International Journal Society Systems Science, 9(2), 139–164. doi: 10.1504/IJSSS.2017.085710

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human behavior and emerging technologies, 2(4), 314-324.

Asnawi, A. A., Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., Mohamad, M., & Karim, F. (2019). The influence of hospital image and service quality on patients’ satisfaction and loyalty. Management Science Letters, 9(6), 911–920. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.2.011.

Awang, Z. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation modeling. Malaysia: MPWS Rich Resources.

Awang, Z., Lim, S. H., & Zainudin, N. (2018). Pendekatan mudah SEM - Structural equation modeling. Malaysia: MPWS Rich Resources.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 107(2), 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York City: The Guilford Press.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005.

Chu, W., Vicidomini, M., Calise, F., Duić, N., Østergaard, P. A., Wang, Q., & da Graça Carvalho, M. (2023). Review of Hot Topics in the Sustainable Development of Energy, Water, and Environment Systems Conference in 2022. Energies, 16(23), 7897

Coelho, P. S., & Esteves, S. P. (2007). The choice between a five-point and a ten-point scale in the framework of customer satisfaction measurement. International Journal of Market Research, 49(3), 313–339. doi: 10.1177/147078530704900305

Fallah Shayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability, 14(3), 1222.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118

Irmak, A., Kurmanov, N., Zhadigerova, O., Turdiyeva, Z., Bakirbekova, A., Saimagambetova, G., ... & Seitzhanov, S. (2023). Shaping energy-saving behavior in education system: A systematic review. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(4), 46-60

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York City: Guilford Press

Mansor, W. N. W., Abdullah, S., Wan, C. W. M. N. C., Jarkoni, M. N. K., Chao, H. R., & Lin, S. L. (2020). Data on greenhouse gases emission of fuels in power plants in Malaysia during the year of 1990–2017. Data in Brief, 30

Murray, J. (2018). Student-led action for sustainability in higher education: a literature review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(6), 1095-1110.

Mustaffa, N. K., & Kudus, S. A. (2022). Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia. Energy, 259, 124839

Nasution, N. E. A. (2023). Using artificial intelligence to create biology multiple choice questions for higher education. Agricultural and Environmental Education, 2(1), 4-8.

Raihan, A.; Tuspekova, A. The nexus between economic growth, renewable energy use, agricultural land expansion, and carbon emissions: New insights from Peru. Energy Nexus 2022, 6, 100067.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons

Stein, S. (2024). Universities confronting climate change: beyond sustainable development and solutionism. Higher Education, 87(1), 165-183

Timm, S. N., & Deal, B. M. (2016). Effective or ephemeral? The role of energy information dashboards in changing occupant energy behaviors. Energy Research & Social Science, 19, 11-20

Wong, F. W. M. H., Foley, A., Del Rio, D. F., Rooney, D., Shariff, S., Dolfi, A., & Srinivasan, G. (2022). Public perception of transitioning to a low-carbon nation: a Malaysian scenario. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24(10), 3077-3092

Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104660

Zikmund, W. G., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Essentials of marketing research (4th ed.).

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page