UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
![]() |
|
|
Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
Kajian ini mengkaji model hubungan saling berkait antara faktor personal dalaman, persekitaran dan tingkah laku pelajar dalam mempengaruhi pencapaian matematik pelajar. Reka bentuk kajian kuantitatif ini merupakan kajian tinjauan secara keratan rentas menggunakan soal selidik MSLQ (Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire), PSI (Problem-Solving Inventory) dan SCoF (Students_ Conceptions of Feedback) yang diadaptasi dan diubahsuai. Analisis indeks kesahan kandungan, faktor penerokaan, kebolehpercayaan Cronbach Alpha dan pengesahan faktor dijalankan untuk menilai kesahan serta kebolehpercayaan faktor soal selidik kajian. Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan soal selidik huraian kendiri yang menggunakan skala selang penilaian kendiri 10 mata berjaya diperolehi. Seramai 429 orang pelajar tingkatan empat Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Harian di Malaysia dipilih sebagai sampel kajian dengan menggunakan pensampelan rawak pelbagai peringkat dan kelompok. Data kajian dianalisis menggunakan perisian IBM-SPSS versi 26 dan IBM-SPSS-AMOS versi 24 untuk menjawab persoalan kajian. Analisis persamaan struktur penuh menunjukkan terdapat hubungan signifikan antara faktor personal dalaman, persekitaran dan tingkah laku berdasarkan model Triadic Reciprocal Causation Bandura. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan 46.0% varian dalam pencapaian matematik berjaya diramalkan oleh pemboleh ubah eksogenus model kajian. Antaranya faktor personal dalaman menyumbang secara signifikan (_ = .688, C.R.= 3.474, p< .05) kepada pencapaian matematik pelajar. Manakala, faktor persekitaran pula memberi kesan negatif (_ = -.167, C.R.= -2.005, p< .05) terhadap pencapaian matematik pelajar. Secara keseluruhan, kesepadanan model yang dicadangkan dalam kerangka kajian ini berjaya dicapai. Hasil kajian ini dapat diaplikasikan dalam merangka pelan pembelajaran yang lebih komprehensif dan efektif untuk menangani isu pencapaian matematik. |
References |
Acharya, B. R. (2017). Factors Affecting Difficulties in Learning Mathematics by Mathematics Learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11 Affuso, G., Zannone, A., Esposito, C., Pannone, M., Miranda, M. C., De Angelis, G., Aquilar, S., Dragone, M., & Bacchini, D. (2023). The effects of teacher support, parental monitoring, motivation and self-efficacy on academic performance over time. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00594-6 Ahmad Radzi Hamdan, Mohd Firdaus Mustafa, & Hafsah Taha. (2021). Hubungan di antara kebimbangan, keyakinan dan sikap guru dengan pencapaian matematik murid sekolah rendah. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 9(2), 49–61. Ahn, J. N., Hu, D., & Vega, M. (2020). “Do as I do, not as I say”: Using social learning theory to unpack the impact of role models on students’ outcomes in education. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1 111/spc3.12517 Al-Khamaiseh, Z., Halim, B. B. A., Afthanorhan, A., & Alqahtani, A. H. (2020). Exploring and developing items measuring situational leadership II (SLII). Development, 3, D4. Alareeni, B., Hamdan, A., & Elgedawy, I. (2021). The Importance of New Technologies and Entrepreneurship in Business Development: In The Context of Economic Diversity in Developing Countries: The Impact of New Technologies and Entrepreneurship on Business Development (Vol. 194). Springer Nature. Alderman, M. K. (2004). Motivation for achievement: possibilities for teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Amani, L., & Serrine, M. (2023). The Exploration of Teachers’ Attitudes towards the Use of the Eclectic Method in Teaching English as a Foreign Language [University of 8 Mai 1945]. https://dspace.univ-guelma.dz/jspui/bitstream/123 456789/15589/1/M821.436.pdf Appiah, J. B., Korkor, S., Arthur, Y. D., & Obeng, B. A. (2022). Mathematics achievement in high schools, the role of the teacher-student relationship, students’ self-efficacy, and students’ perception of mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0688. https://doi.org/10.2933 3/iejme/12056 Arens, A. K., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., Yeung, A. S., Randhawa, E., & Hasselhorn, M. (2016). Math self-concept in preschool children: Structure, achievement relations, and generalizability across gender. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 391–403. Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F. J., & Yagmur, K. (2016). Factors Contributing to Mathematics Achievement Differences of Turkish and Australian Students in TIMSS 2007 and 2011. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(8), 2039–2059. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1268a Armstrong, J. S. (1975). Monetary incentives in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1086/268203 Asher, H. B. (1983). Causal Modeling (second). Sage Publications, Inc. Asher, H. B., Weisberg, H. F., Kessel, J. H., & Shively, W. P. (1984). Theory-building and data analysis in the social sciences. In University of Tennessee Press. University of Tennessee Press. https://utpress.org/title/theory-building-and-data-analysis-in-social-sciences/ Ayhan, B. (2020). Social cognitive theory. In Consumer Behavior Models (Vol. 6, pp. 139–151). JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491146-7 Azman Ab Rahman, Nurul Nadia Nozlan, Hussein ‘Azeemi Abdullah Thaidi, Muhammad Firdaus Ab Rahman, & Mohamad Anwar Zakaria. (2021). Pandemik COVID-19: Isu Penggunaan ICT Dalam Proses Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran (PdP) Bagi Pelajar Orang Kurang Upaya (OKU) di Institusi Pendidikan Khas di Malaysia. The Malaysian Journal of Islamic Sciences, 33(S4), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol33nos4.428 Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014a). Elemen KBAT dalam kurikulum. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014b). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi: Aplikasi di sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016). Buku penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2012). Dasar Pendidikan Kebangsaan (3rd ed.). Giga Wise Network Sdn. Bhd. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2016a). Laporan TIMSS 2015-trends in international mathematics and science study. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2016b). PISA 2015-programme for international student assessment. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2019). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2022). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia. In Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2023). Laporan Awal Pencapaian Malaysia dalam Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2022. https://www.moe.gov.my/storage/files/shares/Lain-lain/PISA/lapor an-awal-pencapaian-malaysia-pisa-2022.pdf Bahrum, S., Wahid, N., & Ibrahim, N. (2017). Integration of STEM Education in Malaysia and Why to STEAM. 7(6), 645–654. https://doi.org/ 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i6/3027 Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. Bandura, A. (1978a). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90012-7 Bandura, A. (1978b). The self system in reciprocal determinism. In American Psychologist (Vol. 33, Issue 4, pp. 344–358). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344 Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 Bandura, A. (1989a). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 Bandura, A. (1989b). Social cognitive theory. Annals of Child Developmen, 6, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052675-22 Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. Bandura, A. (1996). Social cognitive theory of human development. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 5513–5518). Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Reviews, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2018.8450379 Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00092 Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280 Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01663995 Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(6), 601–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045550 Baroody, A. E., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. A., & Curby, T. W. (2016). A multi-method approach for describing the contributions of student engagement on fifth grade students’ social competence and achievement in mathematics. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.012 Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43. Basmin Maarof. (2023). Kurang minat bidang STEM jejas keperluan tenaga kerja pakar. Berita Harian Online. Beaumont, J., Putwain, D. W., Gallard, D., Malone, E., Marsh, H. W., & Pekrun, R. (2023). Students’ Emotion Regulation and School-Related Well-Being: Longitudinal Models Juxtaposing Between- and Within-Person Perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 21. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000800 Belle, L. J. (2017). Factors That Influence Student Behaviour in Secondary Schools. European Journal of Educational and Development Psychology, 5(27), 27–36. Bergman, Z., Bergman, M. M., & Thatcher, A. (2019). Agency and Bandura’s Model of Triadic Reciprocal Causation: An Exploratory Mobility Study Among Metrorail Commuters in the Western Cape, South Africa. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00411 Bloom, B. S., Englehard, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I Cognitive Domain. Longmans, Green and Co LTD, 16, 1–207. Blunsdon, B., Reed, K., McNeil, N., & McEachern, S. (2003). Experiential learning in social science theory: An investigation of the relationship between student enjoyment and learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000056544 Bofah, E. A., & Hannula, M. S. (2015). TIMSS data in an African comparative perspective: investigating the factors influencing achievement in mathematics and their psychometric properties. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 3(4), 1–36. Bonne, L., & Johnston, M. (2016). Students’ beliefs about themselves as mathematics learners. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tsc.2016.02.001 Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: turning experience into learning. Routledge. Brown, G. T. L., Peterson, E. R., & Yao, E. S. (2016). Student conceptions of feedback: Impact on self-regulation, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 1–24. Brown, J. D. (2009a). Choosing the Right Type of Rotation in PCA and EFA. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(November), 20–25. Brown, J. D. (2009b). Principal components analysis and exploratory factor analysis—Definitions, differences, and choices. Statistics, 13(1), 26–30. Burke, M. I. M. J. M. I., Landis, R. S., & Burke, M. I. M. J. M. I. (2014). .80 and Beyond: Recommendations for Disattenuating Correlations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(4), 531–535. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S1 754942600006830 Burleson, S. E., & Thoron, A. C. (2017). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and its relation to learning and achievement. University of Florida, 1–3. Burnes, B. (2020). The Origins of Lewin’s Three-Step Model of Change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188 6319892685 Burnes, B., & Cooke, B. (2013). Kurt Lewin’s field theory: A review and re-evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x Bussey, K., & Bussey, K. (2023). The Contribution of Social Cognitive Theory to School Bullying Research and Practice. Theory Into Practice, 0(0), null-null. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2226549 Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szucs, D. (2017). The modified abbreviated math anxiety scale: A valid and reliable instrument for use with children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 11. Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x Cazan, A.-M., & Schiopca, B.-A. (2014). Self-directed learning , personality traits and academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.327 Ceylan, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Improving a Sample Lesson Plan for Secondary Science Courses within the STEM Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177(July 2014), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.395 Chaman, M. J. (2014). Factors Influencing Mathematics Achievement among Secondary School Students [SensePublishers]. In University of Tasmania. https://eprints.utas.edu.au/22784/1/Whole_Chaman_thesis.pdf Chan, C. P., & Rosli, R. (2021). Kebimbangan Matematik dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Tingkatan Satu. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(3), 30–40. Chang, H., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). The math anxiety-math performance link and its relation to individual and environmental factors: A review of current behavioral and psychophysiological research. In Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 33–38). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.011 Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 1–20). World Scientific. Change, B., Psychology, H., Sciences, H., Psychology, H., Sciences, P., Psychology, A., Psychology, S., Sciences, S., Psychology, E., & Sciences, H. (2020). The Handbook of Behavior Change. In The Handbook of Behavior Change. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318 Chong, S. Y., Wong, J. T., & Abdul Halim. (2017). Pencapaian Matematik TIMSS 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011 dan 2015: Di Mana Kedudukan Malaysia Dalam Kalangan Negara Asia Tenggara? Malaysian Journal of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Education, 2(3), 54–108. Chua, L. C. (2006). Sample Size Estimation Using Krejcie And Morgan And Cohen Statistical Power Analysis: A Comparison. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL. Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: kaedah penyelidikan Buku 1. McGraw-Hill Education (Malaysia). Chua, Y. P. (2009). Statistik penyelidikan lanjutan II: ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM Buku 5. McGraw-Hill Education. Chua, Y. P. (2013). Mastering research statistics. McGraw-Hill Education (Asia). Chua, Y. P. (2014a). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: kaedah penyelidikan Buku 1 (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Chua, Y. P. (2014b). Kaedah Dan Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 5: Ujian Regresi, Analisis Faktor dan Analisis SEM. In Mc Graw Hill Education. McGraw-Hill Education (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(04)00066-9 Clifford, M., Behrstock-Sherratt, E., & Fetters, J. (2012). The ripple effect: A synthesis of research on principal influence to inform performance evaluation design. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied Structural Equation Modelling Using AMOS: Basic to Advanced Techniques (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/97810 03018414 Czavar, A. (2014). Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory (pp. 1–8). The City University of New York. de Ridder, D. T. D., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418749 de Run, E. C., Lo, M. C., Heriyadi, K., & Kusnaryadi, H. (2008). Basic analysis: A guide for students and researchers. Jade Tree Press Kuching. del Rio, V. M. (2013). Effects of sex , third grade reading achievement and motivation as predictors of fourth grade reading achievement of hispanic students : a path analysis. Florida International University. Demirel, M., Derman, I., & Karagedik, E. (2015). A study on the relationship between reflective thinking skills towards problem solving and attitudes towards mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2086–2096. Dickhäuser, O., Dinger, F. C., Janke, S., Spinath, B., & Steinmayr, R. (2016). A prospective correlational analysis of achievement goals as mediating constructs linking distal motivational dispositions to intrinsic motivation and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 30–41. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.020 Dinkelmann, I., & Buff, A. (2016). Children’s and parents’ perceptions of parental support and their effects on children’s achievement motivation and achievement in mathematics. A longitudinal predictive mediation model. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 122–132. Duchesne, S., Mcmaugh, A., & Mackenzie, E. (2022). Educational Psychology for Learning and Teaching (7th ed.). Cengage Learning Australia Pty Limited. Duckworth, A. L., Taxer, J. L., Eskreis-Winkler, L., Galla, B. M., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Self-Control and Academic Achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230 Educational Macro Data Planning Sector. (2021). Quick Fact Malaysia Educational Statistics 2021. Fauzi Hussin, Jamal Ali, & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor. (2014). Kaedah Penyelidikan & Analisis Data SPSS. In Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd. Fong, C. J., Gonzales, C., Cox, C. H. T., & Shinn, H. B. (2021). Academic Help-Seeking and Achievement of Postsecondary Students: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/edu0000725 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom Environment Instruments: Development, Validity and Applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10. 1023/A:1009932514731 Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. Te, Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15. Frinch, W. H., & French, B. F. (2019). Educational and Psychological Measurement. Taylor & Francis. Fritz, W. (2015). A QUANTITATIVE STUDY INVESTIGATING THE EFFICACY BELIEFS OF ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INCLUDING A SPECIFIC EMPHASIS ON MATHEMATICS. Northwest Nazarene University. Froiland, J. M., & Davison, M. L. (2016). The longitudinal influences of peers, parents, motivation, and mathematics course-taking on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2016.07.012 Fryer, L. K., & Leenknecht, M. J. M. (2023). Toward an Organising Theoretical Model for Teacher Clarity, Feedback and Self-Efficacy in the Classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09787-5 Fuad Mohamed Berawi. (2017). Metodologi penyelidikan: Panduan menulis tesis. UUM Press. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=vO_xDwAAQBAJ Furner, J. M., & Gonzalez-DeHass, A. (2011). How do students’ mastery and performance goals relate to math anxiety? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.12973/ ejmste/75209 Gaskin, J., James, M., & Lim, J. (2019). AMOS Plugin: Master Validity Tool. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (14th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545899 George, D., & Mallery, P. (2022). IBM SPSS Statistics 27 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (17th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/97810 03205333 Ghania, A. (2013). An Analysis of Some Internal and External Factors Influencing Learners ’ Success in EFL. Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2018). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Amalan Dan Analisis Kajian. In Penerbit Universiti Malaya (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Godly-Reynolds, E. M. (2022). The school environment project: measuring key elements of school climate and culture in charlotte-mecklenburg schools. In Braz Dent J. University of North Carolina. Göktepe Yildiz, S., & Göktepe Körpeoglu, S. (2023). Prediction of students’ perceptions of problem solving skills with a neuro-fuzzy model and hierarchical regression method: A quantitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11446-1 Goss-Sampson, M. A. (2022). Statistical analysis in JASP a guide for students. Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(3), 269–274. Habsah Muda, Loganathan, N., Zainudin Awang, Hashim Jusoh, & Zaharah Salwati Baba. (2018). Application of theory, methodology and analysis in conducting research: a practical guide to quantitative research and thesis writing (1st ed.). Penerbit UniSZA. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Vectors (Seventh). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019 Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Prentice-Hall, Inc (Vol. 1, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1038/259433b0 Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (Eighth). Annabel Ainscow. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409137.ch4 Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. . T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. In Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal (Vol. 30, Issue 1). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2108813 Hair, J. F. J., L.D.S. Gabriel, M., da Silva, D., & Braga Junior, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0098 Hair, J. F. J., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017. 10008574 Halim, L., Abdullah, S. I. S. S., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2014). Students’ Perceptions of Their Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9484-2 Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 11747-014-0403-8 Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. Bin, Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. Bin, Mohaffyza, M., & Mohamad, B. (2011). The level of marzano higher order thinking skills among technical education students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121–125. Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75. Hill, F., Mammarella, I. C., Devine, A., Caviola, S., Passolunghi, M. C., & Szucs, D. (2016). Maths anxiety in primary and secondary school students: Gender differences, developmental changes and anxiety specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48(2015), 45–53. Hirsch, S. E., Bruhn, A. L., McDaniel, S., & Mathews, H. M. (2022). A Survey of Educators Serving Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Behavioral Disorders, 47(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/01987429211016780 Hishammuddin Tun Hussein. (2022). Kenyataan Media. Hopper, E. (2020). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs explained. ThoughtCo, ThoughtCo, 24, 1–3. http://www.christianworldmedia.com/client/docs/603_1585079540_17.pdf%0Ahttp://www.teach-nology.com/tutorials/teaching/whatareneeds.html Hornsey, M. J., Chapman, C. M., & Oelrichs, D. M. (2021). Ripple effects: Can information about the collective impact of individual actions boost perceived efficacy about climate change? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 97(May), 104217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104217 Huang, X., Zhang, J., & Hudson, L. (2019). Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: the gender moderating effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z Hui, E. X., & Roslinda Rosli. (2021). Kebimbangan dan Efikasi Kendiri Terhadap Pembelajaran Matematik dalam kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(3), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.690 Hui, L., Halili, S., & Razak, R. (2021). Pre-Design for Primary School Active Learning Module: A Triadic Reciprocal Needs Analysis Framework. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.5 09.2021.83.299.312 Jõgi, A. L., & Kikas, E. (2016). Calculation and word problem-solving skills in primary grades - Impact of cognitive abilities and longitudinal interrelations with task-persistent behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 165–181. Jönsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2018). Facilitating students’ active engagement with feedback. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9 781316832134 Kalaycioglu, D. B. (2015). The influence of socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, and anxiety on mathematics achievement in England, Greece, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the USA. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.2731 Kazdin, A. E. (1973). The effect of vicarious reinforcement on attentive behaviour in the classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6(1), 71–78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789477801214 Kazdin, A. E. (2021). The Kazdin Method for Developing and Changing Behavior of Children and Adolescents. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 23(4). Kazdin, A. E., & Rotella, C. (2008). The Kazdin Method for Parenting the Defiant Child: With No Pills, No Therapy, No Contest of Wills (Vol. 4, Issue 1). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=wtTmo iQ0GRQC Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Laporan awal pelan pembangunan pendidikan malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013 - 2025. In Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Laporan tahunan 2016-pelan pembangunan pendidikan malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2022). Laporan Tahunan 2021 Pppm 2013-2025. Ker, H. W. (2015). The impacts of student-, teacher- and school-level factors on mathematics achievement: an exploratory comparative investigation of Singaporean students and the USA students. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 254–276. Khairulazuad Husain. (2018). Kebimbangan Matematik Dengan Pencapaian Matematik dan Faktor Demografi dalam Kalangan Pelajar Matrikulasi. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 14, 81–111. Kibrislioglu, N. (2015). An investigation about 6th grade students’ attitudes towards mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 64–69. Kisigot, C. K., Ogula, P., & Munyua, J. (2022). Relationships of Learning Environment, School Type and Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement Marakwet East Sub-County, Kenya. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 9(6), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0906008 Kiwanuka, H. N., Van Damme, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., Anumendem, D. N., & Namusisi, S. (2015). Factors affecting Mathematics achievement of first-year secondary school students in Central Uganda. South African Journal of Education, 35(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n3a1106 Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practices of structural equation modelling. In D. A. Kenny & T. D. Little (Eds.), The Guilford Press (Fourth). Guilford Press. Koole, S. L., Jostmann, N. B., & Baumann, N. (2023). From intentions to action: An integrative review of action control theory and research. 68, 1–112. Kourmousi, N., Xythali, V., Theologitou, M., & Koutras, V. (2016). Validity and reliability of the problem solving inventory (PSI) in a nationwide sample of greek educators. Social Sciences, 5(2), 25. Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 607–610. Krypotos, A. M., Effting, M., Kindt, M., & Beckers, T. (2015). Avoidance learning: A review of theoretical models and recent developments. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00189 Krypotos, A. M., Vervliet, B., & Engelhard, I. M. (2018). The validity of human avoidance paradigms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 111(October), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.011 Kushwaha, S. S. (2014). Trend in Researches on Mathematics Achievement. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 4(6), 53–62. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-4Issue-6/Version-2/I0462536 2.pdf Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology, 09(08), 2207–2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126 Landau, S., & Everitt, B. (2004). A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. In Statistics in Medicine (Vol. 24, Issue 20). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2134 Lee, J., & Stankov, L. (2013). Higher-order structure of noncognitive constructs and prediction of PISA 2003 mathematics achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 119–130. Lehane, L. (2020). Experiential Learning—David A. Kolb. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_17 Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Pengumuman analisis keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) tahun 2012. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2015). Pengumuman analisis keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) tahun 2014. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2017). Pengumuman analisis keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) tahun 2016. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2018). Pengumuman analisis keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) tahun 2017. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2019a). Pengumuman analisis keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) tahun 2018. http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/ 2019/14032019/Laporan Analisis KeputusanSPM 2018 - Upload.pdf Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2019b). Pengumuman analisis keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) tahun 2018. http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/ spm/2019/14032019/Laporan Analisis Keputusan SPM 2018 - Upload.pdf Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2020). Laporan Analisis Keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) tahun 2019. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2021). Laporan Analisis Keputusan Peperiksaan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM)Tahun 2020. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2022). Laporan Analisis Keputusan Peperiksaan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM)Tahun 2021. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2023). Laporan Analisis Keputusan Peperiksaan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) 2022. Leung, F. K. S. (2014). What can and should we learn from international studies of mathematics achievement? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 579–605. Li, J.-B., Willems, Y. E., Stok, F. M., Dekovic, M., Bartels, M., & Finkenauer, C. (2019). Parenting and Self-Control Across Early to Late Adolescence: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis. In Perspectives on Psychological Science (Vol. 14, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619863046 Li, L., Peng, Z., Lu, L., Liao, H., & Li, H. (2020). Peer relationships, self-efficacy, academic motivation, and mathematics achievement in Zhuang adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105358 Lockwood, P. L., & Klein-Flügge, M. C. (2021). Computational modelling of social cognition and behaviour - A reinforcement learning primer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(8), 761–771. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa040 Luo, W., Ng, P. T., Lee, K., & Aye, K. M. (2016). Self-efficacy, value, and achievement emotions as mediators between parenting practice and homework behavior: A control-value theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.017 Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. Majeed, B. H., Hassan, A. K., & Hammadi, S. S. (2023). The Effect of Cognitive Modeling in Mathematics Achievement and Creative Intelligence for High School Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(9), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i09.39413 Malik, R. H., & Rizvi, A. A. (2018). Effect of Classroom Learning Environment on Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics at Secondary Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(2), 207–218. Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., & Barnes, J. (1983). Multitrait-Multimethod Analyses of the Self-description Questionnaire: Student-Teacher Agreement on Multidimensional Ratings of Student Self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 20(3), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312020003333 Marsono, M. B., Ashari, Z. B. M., Jumaat, N. F. B., Samah, N. B. A., Abdullah, A. H. B., & Ali, D. F. B. (2019). The Relationship Between Self-Determination Emotional Intelligence Towards Achievement Motivation in Mathematics. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education (TALE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48000.2019.9226006 Martin, A. J., Way, J., Bobis, J., & Anderson, J. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of mathematics engagement in the middle years of school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529365 Martin, D. P., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2015). Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math? Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.001 Maskey, R., Fei, J., & Nguyen, H. O. (2018). Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(2), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006 McMinn, M., Aldridge, J., & Henderson, D. (2021). Learning environment, self-efficacy for teaching mathematics, and beliefs about mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09326-x Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Ramayah, T., Chuah, F., & Cheah, J. H. (2017). A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modeling: A malaysian scenario. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 1(1), i–xiii. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.1(1)01 Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. ERIC. Mohamed Hata, N. F., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2020). Kesediaan Guru Sains dan Matematik dalam Melaksanakan Pendidikan Stem dari Aspek Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Pengalaman Mengajar. Akademika, 90, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2020-90IK3-07 Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2003). Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan (Yahaya Ramli (Ed.)). Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). https://books.google.com.my/books?id=H4IMuQAACAAJ Mohd Rashid Ab Hamid, Sami, W., & Sidek, M. H. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 12163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163 Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). Timss 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science Timss & Pirl. In International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2021-01/TIMSS 2019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science.pdf Mumcu, H. Y., & Aktas, M. C. (2015). Multi-program high school students’ attitudes and self-efficacy perceptions toward mathematics. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 59, 207–226. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.59.12 Mundia, L., & Metussin, H. (2019). Exploring factors that improve mathematics achievement in Brunei. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60(October), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.10.003 Mushahari, P., & Sharma, H. (2022). Experiential learning in pre-service teacher education: Attitude of teacher trainees and challenges faced. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 568–576. Nabi, R. L. (2016). Social cognitive theory. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, 6, 1–5. Nadeerah Abd Wahab, & Siti Mistima Maat. (2023). Hubungan Antara Motivasi Murid Dengan Pencapaian Matematik: Kajian Literatur Bersistematik. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 4(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.55057/jdpd.2022.4.4.1 Najar, A., Bonnet, E., Bahrami, B., & Palminteri, S. (2020). The actions of others act as a pseudo-reward to drive imitation in the context of social reinforcement learning. PLoS Biology, 18(12), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.300 1028 Namkung, J. M., Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The Relation Between Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Performance Among School-Aged Students: A Meta-Analysis. In Review of Educational Research (Vol. 89, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319843494 Nasser-Abu Alhija, F., & Amasha, M. (2012). Modeling achievement in mathematics: the role of learner and learning environment characteristics. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2011.640862 Nausheen, M., & Richardson, P. W. (2013). The relationships between the motivational beliefs, course experiences and achievement among postgraduate students in Pakistan. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 603–616. Nazim, A., & Ahmad, S. (2014). Modeling The Influential Factors Of 8th Grades Student’s Mathematics Achievement In Malaysia By Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). 5(6), 950–953. Nazuha Muda @ Yusof, Zokree Abdul Karim, Ruzaidah A. Rashid, Z. M. (2019). Factors Affecting Students’ Achievement in Mathematics: Case Study in Terengganu Nazuha. Jurnal Intelek, 14(2), 198–207. Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2016). Perspektif bersepadu sejagat dalam pendidikan matematik. Penerbit Universiti Malaya. Niu, W., Cheng, L., Duan, D., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Impact of Perceived Supportive Learning Environment on Mathematical Achievement: The Mediating Roles of Autonomous Self-Regulation and Creative Thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(January), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781594 Noor Azura Mat Said, Siti Mariam Bujang, Nor Aishah Buang, Harlina Halizah Siraj@Ramli, & Mohd Nasri Awang Besar. (2022). Critical Thinking Transfer Practice Instrument: A Content Validity Calculation Steps Based on Expert Panel Evaluation. Education in Medicine Journal, 14(3). Noor Erma Abu, & Leong, K. E. (2014). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya terhadap pencapaian matematik tambahan tingkatan 4. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 1–10. Nor Hasnida Che Md Ghazali. (2015). An evaluation of the implementation of the school-based assessment system in Malaysia. University of Southampton. Nor Jannah Hassan, Nooriza Kassim, Safani Bari, Effandi Zakaria, & Norshidah Mohamad. (2015). Infusi Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi ( KBAT ) dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik Murid Bermasalah Penglihatan. Seminar Internasional Pendidikan Khas Pasca Siswazah UKM-UPI-UNESA-SEAMEO SEN Siri 5/2015, 1–13. Nora’asikin Abu Bakar, Ayub, A. F. M., Nor Aniza Ahmad, & Sharifah Intan Sharina Syed Abdullah. (2021). Mathematics Achievement: The Relationship between Student Engagement, Parental Involvement, and Peer Influence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i5/9973 Noraini Aziz. (2014). Kemahiran berfikir kritis pelajar matematik tambahan sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 2(2), 31–49. Norbury, A., Robbins, T. W., & Seymour, B. (2018). Value generalization in human avoidance learning. ELife, 7, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34779.001 Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (2014). Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. People’s Medical Publishing House-USA. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=iiw6zw EACAAJ Norwaheda Hasrin, & Siti Mistima Maat. (2022). Kebimbangan dan Kepercayaan Matematik Serta Hubungan dengan Pembelajaran Matematik ( Mathematical Anxiety and Beliefs and the Relationship with Mathematics Learning ). Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(4), e001437. Nota, L., Heppner, P. P., Soresi, S., & Heppner, M. J. (2009). Examining Cultural Validity of the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI) in Italy. Journal of Career Assessment, 17(4), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072709339490 Núñez, J. L., & León, J. (2015). Autonomy Support in the Classroom. European Psychologist, 20(4), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000234 Nur Hafizah Musa, & Siti Mistima Maat. (2021). Mathematics Anxiety: A Case Study of Students’ Learning Experiences through Cognitive, Environment and Behaviour. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 932–956. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i3/8992 Nurmaizatul Hazirah Mustaffa. (2017). Hubungan antara kebimbangan Matematik dengan motivasi dan prestasi pelajar pada subjek Matematik. National Pre University Seminar 2017 (NpreUS2017), 62–70. Nurul Ain Roslan, & Siti Mistima Maat. (2019). Systematic Literature Review on Secondary School Students’ Mathematics Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v8-i4/6817 Nurul Aina Halim, & Siti Mistima Maat. (2022). Kajian Literatur Bersistematik : Aspek Yang Mempengaruhi Penglibatan Murid Dalam Pembelajaran Matematik ( Systematic Literature Review : Aspect Influencing Student Engagement in Mathematics Learning ). Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 4(4), 14–26. O’Keeffe, L., White, B., Panizzon, D., Elliott, K., & Semmens, A. (2018). Mathematics Anxiety: Year 7 and 8 Student Perceptions. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 1–8. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2228646298?accountid=27428 O’Sullivan, R. H., Chen, Y.-C., & Fish, M. C. (2014). Parental Mathematics Homework Involvement of Low-Income Families with Middle School Students. School Community Journal, 24(2), 165–189. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. In PISA. OECD Publishing. Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory. http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/ Pajares/eff.html Pajares, F. (2005). Self-efficacy during childhood and adolescence: implications for teachers and parents. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 339–367). Information Age Publishing. Pangeni, K. P. (2014). Factors determining educational quality: Student mathematics achievement in Nepal. International Journal of Educational Development, 34(1), 30–41. Pasaribu, B. S., Herawati, A., Utomo, K. W., & Aji, R. H. S. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Ekonomi dan Bisnis. In UUP Academic Manajemen Perusahaan YKPN. MEDIA EDU PUSTAKA. Pekrun, R., Marsh, H. W., Suessenbach, F., Frenzel, A. C., & Goetz, T. (2023). School grades and students’ emotions: Longitudinal models of within-person reciprocal effects. Learning and Instruction, 83, 101626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learnin struc.2022.101626 Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Gracía, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (2015). Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) manual. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. Doi, 10. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.13140/RG Plonsky, L. (2015). Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (Vol. 4324). Routledge New York. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on research methods is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459–467. Ravi, D., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021). Pengintegrasian STEM dalam pengajaran matematik di sekolah rendah: Tinjauan literatur. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(3), 179–188. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd Recber, S., Isiksal, M., & Koc, Y. (2018). Investigating Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, Attitudes and Mathematics Achievement Regarding Gender and School Type. Anales de Psicología, 34(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.1.229571 Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. (2021). The history of dynamic approaches to personality. In The Handbook of Personality Dynamics and Processes. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813995-0.00001-7 Reyes, J. D. (2019). Mathematics Anxiety and Self-Efficacy: A Phenomenological Dimension. Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 1(1), 2581–8651. https://theshillonga.com/index.php/jhed Rodrigues, I. B., Adachi, J. D., Beattie, K. A., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), 1–9. Rogers, W. T. (1976). Jackknifing disattenuated correlations. Psychometrika, 41(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291702 Rosca, V. I. (2020). Implications of Lewin’s Field Theory on Social Change. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 14(1), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2020-0058 Rosseni Din. (2017). Pembinaan & Permodelan Sistem Pengajaran (2nd ed.). Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ruel, E., Wagner III, W. E., & Gillespie, B. J. (2016). The Practice of Survey Research: Theory and Applications. In Sage Publications. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2421 Sabaruddin Dahlan Husen, & Rosnidar Mansor. (2018). Parents’ Involvement in Improving Character of Children Through Mathematics Learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i1.178 Sabri Ahmad, Tengku Zawawi Tengku Zainal, & Aziz Omar. (2006). Isu-isu dalam pendidikan matematik. Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd. Salina Mokhtar, & Rahimi Che Aman. (2014). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen kesejahteraan psikologi versi bahasa melayu. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 61(8), 2656–2661. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2014.2327620 Samuels, P. (2016). Advice on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Centre for Academic Success, Birmingham City University, June, 2. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG. 2.1.5013.9766 Sangaram, S., & Maat, S. M. (2020). Systematic Literature Review on Secondary School Students Mathematics Anxiety. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(11), 1347–1363. https://doi.org/ 10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i11/8341 Sanghvi, P. (2020). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development: a review. Indian Journal of Mental Health, 7, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203715796-5 Schenke, K., Lam, A. C., Conley, A. M., & Karabenick, S. A. (2015). Adolescents’ help seeking in mathematics classrooms: Relations between achievement and perceived classroom environmental influences over one school year. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 133–146. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.003 Schöber, C., Schütte, K., Köller, O., McElvany, N., & Gebauer, M. M. (2018). Reciprocal effects between self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics and reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 63(January 2017), 1–11. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.008 Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016a). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016b). Research methods for business a skill-building approach. In John Wiley & Sons (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_102084 Shaffer, D. R. (2009). Social and personality development. In Wadsworth (sixth). Sharifah Norhuda Syed Wahid, Yusharina Yusof, & Mohd Rizal Razak. (2014). Math anxiety among students in higher education level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 232–237. Shi, Y., & Lin, X. (2021). A Test of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Concept by a Correlational Model Among Adult Learners. Eric - Non-Journal, 1961, 229–234. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611655.pdf Shrotryia, V. K., & Dhanda, U. (2019). Content Validity of Assessment Instrument for Employee Engagement. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244018821751. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018821751 Shukla, S. Y., Tombari, A. K., Toland, M. D., & Danner, F. W. (2015). Parental Support for Learning and High School Students’ Academic Motivation and Persistence in Mathematics. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v5n1p44 Siti Hawa Omar, Sharipah Ruzaina Syed Aris, & Teoh, S. H. (2022). Mathematics Anxiety and its Relationship with Mathematics Achievement among Secondary School Students. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(4), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i4.19992 Siti Mistima Maat, Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah, Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, & Marzita Puteh. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of learning environment instrument among high performance school students. Creative Education, 6(06), 640. Siti Zaharah Yahya, & Ruslin Amir. (2018). Kebimbangan matematik dan pencapaian matematik Tambahan [Mathematics anxiety and additional mathematics performance]. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 3(2), 124–133. Skaalvik, E. M., Federici, R. A., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Mathematics achievement and self-efficacy: Relations with motivation for mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.06.008 Skversky-Blocq, Y., Haaker, J., Shechner, T., & YAEL. (2021). Watch and Learn: Vicarious Threat Learning across Human Development. Brain Sciences, 11(10), 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11101345 Slavin, R. E. (Johns H. U. (2018). Educational Psychology: theory and practice (Twelfth ed). Pearson Education, Inc. Soni, A., & Kumari, S. (2017). The Role of Parental Math Anxiety and Math Attitude in Their Children’s Math Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9687-5 Strauser, J., Stewart, W. P., Foelske, L., Shipley, N., Evans, N. M., Coon, J., & Van Riper, C. J. (2021). Effects of incentives on survey response rates in two rural counties. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 39(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2020-10486 Suppiah Nachiappan, Kamarulzaman Kamaruddin, Abdul Aziz Abdul Shukor, Ramlah Jantan, Roslinda Mustapha, & Hazalizah Hamzah. (2012). Pembelajaran dan perkembangan pelajar. Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. Suppiah Nachiappan, Ramlah Jantan, & Abdul Aziz Abdul Shukor. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. Syed Azman Syed Ismail, & Siti Mistima Maat. (2017). Hubungan antara kebimbangan terhadap matematik dengan pencapaian dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah. Prosiding Seminar Serantau, 16(1999), 170–176. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics. In Pearson Education Limited (6th ed.). Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=bfJJzQEACAAJ Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5. Taherdoost, H. (2017). Determining Sample Size; How to Calculate Survey Sample Size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2. Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2022). Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics, 27, 375–382. Taylor, B. A., & Fraser, B. J. (2013). Relationships between learning environment and mathematics anxiety. Learning Environments Research, 16(2), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9134-x Taylor, R. T. (2012). Review of the motivated strategy for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) using reliability generalization techniques assess scale reliability [Auburn University]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 Teo, H. S., Rosnidar Mansor, & Norliza Abdul Majid. (2022). Confirmatory Factors Analysis of Learning Environment Instrument among Secondary School Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(4), 1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i4/16089 Timbrook, J., Smyth, J. D., & Olson, K. (2020). Are self-description scales better than agree/disagree scales? International Journal of Market Research, 63(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320971592 Topçu, M. S., Erbilgin, E., & Arikan, S. (2016). Factors predicting Turkish and Korean students’ science and mathematics achievement in timss 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1711–1737. Tosto, M. G., Asbury, K., Mazzocco, M. M. M. M., Petrill, S. A., & Kovas, Y. (2016). From classroom environment to mathematics achievement: The mediating role of self-perceived ability and subject interest. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.009 Town, R., & Islands, B. V. (2021). International Journal of Education and Management SEPTEMBER 2021 VOLUME6 NUMBER3. 6(September). Tri Harinie, L., Sudiro, A., Rahayu, M., & Fatchan, A. (2017). Study of the Bandura’s Social Cognitive Learning Theory for the Entrepreneurship Learning Process. Social Sciences, 6(1), 1–6. Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.88 Van der Kleij, F. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021). Student perceptions of assessment feedback: a critical scoping review and call for research. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(2), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09331-x Van Houtum, L. A. E. M., Wever, M. C. M., Janssen, L. H. C., Van Schie, C. C., Will, G. J., Tollenaar, M. S., & Elzinga, B. M. (2021). Vicarious praise and pain: parental neural responses to social feedback about their adolescent child. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/ scan/nsab004 Vandecandelaere, M., Speybroeck, S., Vanlaar, G., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2012). Learning environment and students’ mathematics attitude. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(3–4), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc. 2012.09.001 Vignery, K., & Laurier, W. (2020). Achievement in student peer networks: A study of the selection process, peer effects and student centrality. International Journal of Educational Research, 99(September 2018), 101499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer. 2019.101499 Vispoel, W. P., Morris, C. A., & Kilinc, M. (2018). Using Generalizability Theory to Disattenuate Correlation Coefficients for Multiple Sources of Measurement Error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/0027 3171.2018.1457938 Voelkel, S., Bates, A., Gleave, T., Larsen, C., Stollar, E. J., Wattret, G., & Mello, L. V. (2023). Lecture capture affects student learning behaviour. FEBS Open Bio, 13(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13548 Vogel, F. R., & Human-Vogel, S. (2016). Academic commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement in additional materials science. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(6), 1298–1310. Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807 Weiten, W. (2022). Psychology: Themes and variations. In Opera (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. Wernersbach, B. (2011). The impact of study skills courses on academic self-efficacy. Utah State University. Wheeler, L. (2008). Kurt Lewin. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1638–1650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00131.x Wijaya, T. T., Rahmadi, I. F., Chotimah, S., Jailani, J., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2022). A Case Study of Factors That Affect Secondary School Mathematics Achievement: Teacher-Parent Support, Stress Levels, and Students’ Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316247 Willems, Y. E., Boesen, N., Li, J., Finkenauer, C., & Bartels, M. (2019). The heritability of self-control: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 100(February), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.012 Wilson, K., & Narayan, A. (2014). Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology, 1–18. Winheller, S., Hattie, J. A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Factors influencing early adolescents’ mathematics achievement: High-quality teaching rather than relationships. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 49–69. Winstone, N. E., Hepper, E. G., & Nash, R. A. (2021). Individual differences in self-reported use of assessment feedback: the mediating role of feedback beliefs. Educational Psychology, 41(7), 844–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019. 1693510 Woodcock, S., & Tournaki, N. (2023). Bandura’s Triadic Reciprocal Determinism model and teacher self-efficacy scales: a revisit. Teacher Development, 27(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2150285 Woolfolk, A. (2021). Educational psychology (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. Wu, Y. (2016). Universal Beliefs and Specific Practices: Students’ Math Self-Efficacy and Related Factors in the United States and China. International Education Studies, 9(12), 61. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p61 Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. Xu, X., Schönrock-Adema, J., Jaarsma, A. D. C. C., Duvivier, R. J., & Bos, N. A. (2022). A conducive learning environment in international higher education: A systematic review of research on students’ perspectives. Educational Research Review, 37(June), 100474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev. 2022.100474 Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, H. H. (2019). Predicting mathematics achievement: The role of perceived feedback, teacher support and self-beliefs. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.435345 Yu, X., Wang, X., Zheng, H., Zhen, X., Shao, M., Wang, H., & Zhou, X. (2023). Academic achievement is more closely associated with student-peer relationships than with student-parent relationships or student-teacher relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(February), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1012701 Zainudin Awang. (2012). Research Methodology and Data Analysis. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA Press. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=yQ gAnwEACAAJ Zainudin Awang, Afthanorhan, A., & Mamat, M. (2016). The Likert scale analysis using parametric based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 4(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1299429 Zainudin Awang, Lim, S. H., & Nur Fairuza Syahira Zainudin. (2018). Pendekatan Mudah SEM (Structural Equation Modelling). MPWS Rich Resources Sdn. Bhd. Zainudin Awang, Wan Mohamad Asyraf Wan Afthanorhan, Lim, S. H., & Nur Fairuza Syahira Zainudin. (2023). SEM Made Simple 2.0: A Gentle Approach of Structural Equation Modelling. Penerbit UniSZA. Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy: A systematic review of intervention studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(September). https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986622 Zakiah, N. E., & Fajriadi, D. (2020). Self regulated learning for social cognitive perspective in mathematics lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012049 Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017 Zedan, R., & Bitar, J. (2014). Environment Learning as a Predictor of Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Math Achievement. American International Journal of Social Science, 3(6), 85–97. Zeng, X., Wang, S., & Zhang, F. (2020). Correlation Analysis between Self-Efficacy and Psychological Anxiety of College English Learners Based on Triadic Reciprocal Determinism. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 29(1), 1319. Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019). The relationship between math anxiety and math performance: a meta-analytic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(AUG), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613 Zhou, M., & Brown, D. (2014). Educational learning theories. Education Open Textbooks. http://oer.galileo.usg.edu/education-textbooks/1 Zhu, Y., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2016). University students’ self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.001 Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. Zimmerman, B. J., Heart, N., Mellins, R. B., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2003). Educational psychology: A century of contributions: A Project Division 15 (educational psychology) of the American Psychological Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Zulkepli, M., Sipan, I., & Jibril, J. D. (2017). An Exploratory Factor Analysis and Reliability Analysis for Green Affordable Housing Criteria Instrument. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 11(4), 9–21. Zuraidah Zainol. (2018). Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS: A Step by Step Approach.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |