Geometric AR-based pedagogical module is beneficial: Affecting factors from the lens of Malaysian mathematics secondary school teachers

Faridah Hanim Yahya

QR Code Link :
Type :	Article
Subject :	L Education (General)
ISBN :	2311-6897
Main Author :	Faridah Hanim Yahya
Additional Authors :	Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil Mohd Muslim Md Zalli
Title :	Geometric AR-based pedagogical module is beneficial: Affecting factors from the lens of Malaysian mathematics secondary school teachers
Hits :	154

Place of Production :	Tanjung Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :	2024
Notes :	International Journal of Education and Practice
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link :	Click to view web link
PDF Full Text :	You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The purpose of this study was to predict the likelihood that teachers would consider the Geometric AR-based Pedagogical Module (GeAR-PM) as beneficial, and study the factors that influence their decision. The data for this study was gathered via a survey method. A sample of 202 Malaysian secondary school teachers was randomly selected as respondents for this study. Specifically, the respondents were asked to answer questions using an instrument which was developed based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. This study comprised four UTAUT variables: performance expectation, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions, and one additional variable, self-efficacy. All variables showed high reliability with Cronbach Alpha_s values between 0.87 to 0.91. The data was analyzed using a binary logistic regression via Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0. The findings revealed that a teacher's belief that GeAR-PM is beneficial was significantly related to his/ her perception on effort expectancy, social influence, and self-efficacy. Hence, when developing the GeAR-PM, these three factors should be weighed up. _ 2024 Conscientia Beam. All Rights Reserved.

References

Ab Jalil, H., Rajakumar, M., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2022). Teachers' acceptance of technologies for 4IR adoption: Implementation of the UTAUT model. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.2.

Abbad, M. M. (2021). Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7205-7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5.

Abdullah, A. H., Abd Wahab, R., Mokhtar, M., Atan, N. A., Abd Halim, N. D., Surif, J., . . . Kohar, U. H. A. (2022). DOES sketchup make improve students’ visual-spatial skills? IEEE Access, 10, 13936-13953. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3147476.

Andrea, R., Lailiyah, S., Agus, F., & Ramadiani, R. (2019). “Magic Boosed” an elementary school geometry textbook with markerbased augmented reality. TELKOMNIKA Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control, 17(3), 1242-1249. https://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v17i3.11559.

Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34-47.

Bacca Acosta, J. L., Baldiris Navarro, S. M., Fabregat Gesa, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 133-149.

Bakar, N. S. A., Maat, S. M., & Rosli, R. (2020). Mathematics teacher's self-efficacy of technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 259-276.

Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.

Barut, M. E. O., & Retnawati, H. (2020). Geometry learning in vocational high school: Investigating the students’ difficulties and levels of thinking. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series IOP Publishing, 1613(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012058.

Chao, C. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral Intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652-1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652.

Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1968). A general definition of residuals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 30(2), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1968.tb00724.x.

Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.

De Brey, C., Snyder, T. D., Zhang, A., & Dillow, S. A. (2021). Digest of education statistics 2019 (No. 2021–009). National Center for Education Statistics.

Delgado-Rebolledo, R., & Zakaryan, D. (2020). Relationships between the knowledge of practices in mathematics and the pedagogical content knowledge of a mathematics lecturer. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 567-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09977-0.

Farah, R. N., & Hanani, R. (2019). LinProT: The feasibility of a multimedia courseware for optimization methods course. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), 4601-4606.

Fatmasari, R., Gunherani, D., Murniarti, E., Sampaleng, D., & Sugiarti, D. Y. (2018). Effect of performance expectation, social influence, and self-confidence on the mobile learning behavior. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First Indonesian Communication Forum of Teacher Training and Education Faculty Leaders International Conference.

Fujita, T., Kondo, Y., Kumakura, H., Kunimune, S., & Jones, K. (2020). Spatial reasoning skills about 2D representations of 3D geometrical shapes in grades 4 to 9. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00335-w.

Ganesan, N., & Eu, L. K. (2020). The effect of dynamic geometry software geometer's sketchpad on students' achievement in topic circle among form two students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 58-68.

Henson, R. K. (2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3703_1.

Hosmer, D. W., Hosmer, T., Le Cessie, S., & Lemeshow, S. (1997). A comparison of goodness‐of‐fit tests for the logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine, 16(9), 965-980. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970515)16:9%3C965::aidsim509%3E3.0.co;2-o.

Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers’ perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 2653-2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z.

Jain, V., & Jain, P. (2022). From industry 4.0 to education 4.0: Acceptance and use of videoconferencing applications in higher education of Oman. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 1079-1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-10-2020-0378.

Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., Perbowo, K. S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). A meta-analysis of Geogebra software decade of assisted mathematics learning: What to learn and where to go? Heliyon, 7(5), e06953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953.

Kim, J., & Lee, K. S.-S. (2022). Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers’ adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: Using the UTAUT model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 699-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1776213.

Krueger, M. W., Gionfriddo, T., & Hinrichsen, K. (1985). VIDEOPLACE—an artificial reality. Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Kundu, A., Bej, T., & Dey, K. N. (2021). Investigating effects of self-efficacy and infrastructure on teachers' ICT use, an extension of UTAUT. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 16(6), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.20211101.oa10.

Laborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Strässer, R. (2006). Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future. In (1st ed., pp. 275-304). Rotterdam: Brill.

Mailizar, M., & Johar, R. (2021). Exploring the potential use of GeoGebra augmented reality in a project-based learning environment: The case of geometry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1882(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012045.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025. Malaysian Government. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/dasar/1207-malaysia-education-blueprint-2013-2025/file.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2019). TIMSS 2019 national report. Malaysian Government. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/rujukan-akademik/3918-buku-laporan-timss2019/file.

Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192.

Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.

Nadzeri, M. B. (2022). Analysis of weaknesses among second-grade primary school pupils on learning geometry topic. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 7(2), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.30880/ojtp.2022.07.02.006.

Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691-692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page