UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :Article
Subject :L Education (General)
ISBN :0216-1370
Main Author :Nor Hasnida Che Md Ghazali
Additional Authors :
  • Zahari Suppian
  • Hishamuddin Ahmad
  • Syaza Hazwani Zaini
  • Tajul Rosli Shuib
Title :E-learning, assessment competency, and academic performance: A structural equation modeling approach
Hits :226
Place of Production :Tanjung Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2024
Notes :Cakrawala Pendidikan
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link : Click to view web link
PDF Full Text :You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
E-learning practices and the competency in assessment should facilitate one_s academic performance. The main purpose of this study is to explore the degree of influence of e-learning practices and competency in assessment on academic achievement of students. This study is a quantitative approach using survey method involving the process of data collection through the administration of constructed instruments. The population of the study involves student teachers from the three selected universities in Selangor and Perak. Sample selection is drawn using random sampling technique. A total of 460 student teachers are selected. The questionnaire for e-learning practices is adapted from OLES (Renee, 2011) and the competency in assessment comes from Zahari (2018). The structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis is used to test the hypothesized relationship. The results show that e-learning practices, knowledge in assessment, skills in assessing, and attitude in assessment significantly influence students_ academic achievement. E-learning practices emerge as the strongest predictor of student achievement, with a significant standardized regression coefficient of 0.39. This is followed by skills in assessing (0.27), knowledge in assessment (0.09), and lastly attitude in assessment (0.08). The core findings of the study have some implications for higher education and practice, measurement and theory development, and future research. _ 2024, author.

References

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended   two-step   approach.Psychological   Bulletin, 103(3),   411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

Boyatzis,  R.  E.  (2006).  Intentional  change  theory  from  a  complexity  perspective.Journal  of Management Development,25(7), 607-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610678445.

Byrne,  B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS:Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Earlbum.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th ed. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.

Hara, N. & Kling, R. (2000). Students' distress with a web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants' experiences. Information, Communication and Society,3(4), 557-579. DOI:10.1080/13691180010002297.

Ismail, N. A. (2011). Understanding the gap in Mathematics achievement of Malaysian students. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 389-394. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.5.389-394.

Kalpana,  V.  (2010). Future trends  in e-learning. IEEE  2010  4th  International  Conference  on Distance Learning and Education (ICDLE). 10.1109/ICDLE.2010.5606011.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of SEM. Guilford Press. Koohang, A. & Harman, K. (2005). Open source: A metaphor for e-learning. Informing Science Journal,8, 24-34.https://doi.org/10.28945/2867.

Krejcie,  R.V.  &  Morgan,  D.W.  (1970). Determining  sample  size  for  research  activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.

Kumar, J. (2010). Aplikasi e-learning dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran  di sekolah-sekolah Malaysia,  cadangan  pelaksanaan  pada  senario  masa  kini.Kementerian  Pendidikan Malaysia.

Masrom,  M.  (2007). Technology  acceptance  model  and  e-learning.  In:  12th  International Conference  on   Education,   21-24   May   2007,  Sultan   Hassanal   Bolkiah   Institute   of Education,    Universiti    Brunei    Darussalam.    Retrieved    March    27,    2015    from http://eprints.utm.my/5482/1/MaslinMasrom2006_Techn.pdf.

Nordin, M. S. (2008). Pengujian dan penaksiran di bilik Darjah. International Islamic University Malaysia Press. Parry, S. B. (1996). The quest for competencies. Training, 33(7), 48-56. 

Renee, C. S. Y. (2011). Perceptions of online learning in an Australian university. PhD Thesis. Queensland University of Technology. 

Rohmadi,   M.,   Sudaryanto,   M.,   Prayitno,   H.,   &   Zainnuri,   H.   (2023).   Technology-based pragmagogy  competency  assessment  to  measure  teachers'  ability  in  classroom management. Cakrawala   Pendidikan:   Jurnal   Ilmiah   Pendidikan,   42(3),   652-665, https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.52599.

Smart,  K.  L.,  &  Cappel,  J.  J.  (2006). Students' perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal     of     Information     Technology     Education, 5,retrieved     from http://jite.org/documents/Vol5/v5p201219Smart54.pdf.

Stockley,  D. (2003). E-learning definition and explanation (E-learning, online training, online learning). Retrieved from http://derekstockley.com.au/elearning-definition.html.

Suah,  S.  L.  (2012). Analisis  model  literasi  dan  amalan  pentaksiran  guru  sekolah  serta  kajian tentang  jurang  antara  keduanya  (Analysis  of  literacy  model  and  assessment  practices  of teachers  and  study  of  the  culture  gap).Unpublished  Ph.D.,dissertation.  School  of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Suah, S. L., Ong, S.L., & Shuki, O. (2010). Pentaksiran pembelajaran pelajar: Amalan guru-guru di Malaysia. Malaysian Education Deans' Council Journal,5, 68-83.

Susilana,  R.,  Dewi,  L.,  Rullyana,  G.,  Hadiapurwa,  A.,  &  Khaerunnisa,  N.  (2022).  Canmicrolearning strategy assist students'  online  learning? Cakrawala  Pendidikan:  Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 41(2), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.43387.

Volante,  L.  &  Beckett,  D.  (2011). Formative  assessment  and  the  contemporary  classroom: Synergies and tensions between research and practice. Canadian Journal of Education,2, 239-255. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ936752.

Wahyu,  I.  &  Yahya,  B.  (2007). Aplikasi  e-learning  dalam  pengajaran  dan  pembelajaran  di sekolah-sekolah  Malaysia:  Isu  dan  cadangan  perlaksanaannya. Universiti  Teknologi Malaysia Skudai. 

Zahari, S. (2018). Pembinaan instrumen kompetensi guru pelatih dalam PBD. Unpublished Ph.D.Thesis, UKM, Bangi.

Zanaton, I.,Mohd-Nor, S. N. A., Mahmud, S. N., & Zakaria, E. (2014). Applying the principle of LessonStudy in teaching science. Asian Social Science, 10(4),108-113.http://dx.doi.org10.5539 /ass.v10n4p108.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.