| 
               
              UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)               
              
             | 
            
               | 
          
                        
  | 
                    
                        
  | 
                    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris | 
| Classroom-based assessment (CBA) is applied in the education system in Malaysia. It substitutes the public examination system at primary school level and holistically gives prominence to summative and formative assessment. This case study examined the intended objectives of CBA in relation to its actual impact on bottom 40 (B40) income group pre-school and primary school students, identifying the effectiveness and challenges of CBA implementation and highlighting the barriers that hinder its success in achieving educational goals. In-depth interviews were conducted with 13 participants selected from a quota sample to gather data. The interview findings were analyzed to form themes and were confirmed by experts through a Cohen Kappa index of 0.803. The findings regarding the effectiveness of CBA showed that CBA is a holistic assessment for B40 students, especially students who are weak in learning, as it encompasses a comprehensive learning and continuous assessment. CBA is also beneficial for B40 students as they are given the opportunity to achieve the desired mastery level; thus, the gap between B40 students and non-B40 students can be minimized. In addition, this study also highlighted the achievement of B40 students through their mastery of subjects at school. Challenges in the implementation of CBA for B40 pre-school and primary school students encompass three aspects, namely challenges in knowledge, achievement, and implementation. This study explored critical discussion and understanding to improve the learning system and further realized the benefits of implementing CBA, especially for B40 pre-school and primary school students. ©Authors. | 
| References | 
Arumugham, K. S. (2020). Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah [Curriculum, teaching and assessment in the perspective of classroom assessment]. Asian People Journal (APJ), 3(1), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.1.175. Brandmo, C., Panadero, E., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). Bridging classroom assessment and self-regulated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2020.1803589. Campbell, C. (2013). Research on teacher competency in Classroom Based Assessment. In J. H.McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on Classroom Based Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Christoforidou, M., & Kyriakides, L. (2021). Developing teacher assessment skills: The impact of the dynamic approach to teacher professional development. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article 101051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101051. Climie, E., & Henley, L. (2016). A renewed focus on strengths‐based assessment in schools. British Journal of Special Education, 43(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12131. Curriculum Development Division [Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia]. (2019). Panduan perlaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah [Classroom-based assessment implementation guideline (2nd ed.)]. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/storage/files/shares/pentaksiran-berasaskan-sekolah/Panduan%20Pelaksanaan%20Pentaksiran%20Bilik%20Darjah%20Edisi%202%20-%202019.pdf. Devisakti, A., Muftahu, M., & Xiaoling, H. (2023). Digital divide among B40 students in Malaysian higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1857–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11847-w. Hock, T. T., Ayub, A. F. M., Shah, M. M., & Ahamed, A. B. (2022). Implementation of Classroom-Based Assessment in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i4/14621. Hopfenbeck, T. N (2020). The need for actionable feedback in assessment literacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(3), 249–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1771665. Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768. Lewkowicz, J., & Leung, C. (2021). Classroom-based assessment. Language Teaching, 54(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444820000506. Lokman, H. F., Abdullah, N., Che Mustafa, M., Sembak, S., & Baskaran, V. L. (2023). Metasynthesis of classroom-based assessment implementation: Impact and issues. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(4), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.4.18. Mahamod, Z., Mazlan, R., Amin, N., & Abd. Rahman, M. Z. (2021). Tahap penguasaan kemahiran membaca dan menulis murid-murid B40 dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu [The level of proficiency in reading and writing by B40 students in Malay language]. PENDETA: Journal of Malay Language, Education and Literature, 12(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.37134/pendeta.vol12.1.4.2021. Mazlan, R., Amin, N., Abd Rahman, M. Z., & Mahamod, Z. (2020). Tahap penguasaan membaca dan menulis murid B40 dari perspektif guru bahasa Melayu [Reading and writing mastery level of B40 students from the perspective of Malay language teachers]. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 10(2), 54–73. https://journalarticle.ukm.my/16196/. Mohamed Nafuri, A. F., Sani, N. S., Zainudin, N. F. A., Rahman, A. H. A., & Aliff, M. (2022). Clustering analysis for classifying student academic performance in higher education. Applied Sciences, 12(19), Article 9467. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199467.  | 
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.  |