UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Classroom assessment is essential for tracking students’ progress and improving teaching and learning in the classroom. However, the lack of clear documentation to guide teachers in assessing student mastery often hinders effective communication between teachers and stakeholders about the students’ progress. This study aimed to develop and test the digital classroom assessment document (CA-Do) for form one mathematics to improve classroom assessment practices. Design research and development method, based on ADDIE model, was used to create the digital CA-Do, and 55 mathematics teachers from 55 schools were sampled using stratified sampling. The data collected was then analyzed using SPSS version 27. The digital CA-Do received a satisfactory expert validity score of content validity index (1.00), and found all four tested sub-constructs (i.e., usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction of use) to be of high level. There were significant differences in teachers’ knowledge post-familiarization with the digital CA-Do. The study concludes that the digital CA-Do can aid teachers in recording the intervention and impact of teaching and learning information and consistently assessing pupils’ mastery level. This research provides guidance to educators on how to modify their classroom assessment strategies to enhance teaching outcomes and classroom assessment methods, particularly formative assessment. © 2024 by Author/s and Licensed by Modestum. |
| References |
Akayuure, P. (2021). Classroom assessment literacy levels of mathematics teachers in Ghanaian senior high schools. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 2(2), Article ep21013. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/11286. Arumugham, K. S. (2020). Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah. [Curriculum, teaching, and assessment from the perspective of classroom assessment implementation]. Asian People Journal, 3(1), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.1.175. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2019). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Baidoo-Anu, D., Rasooli, A., DeLuca, C., & Cheng, L. (2023). Conceptions of classroom assessment and approaches to grading: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Education Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2244136. Balbi, A., Bonilla, M. Otamendi, M. A., Curione, K., & Beltrán-Pellicer, P. (2020). Formative assessment and mathematics education: The perspective of in-service mathematics teachers. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 236-269. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7043. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408600105. Boström, E., & Palm, T. (2023). The effect of a formative assessment practice on student achievement in mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1101192. Brandmo, C., Panadero, E., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). Bridging classroom assessment and self-regulated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2020.1803589. Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan [Research method]. McGraw Hill. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539. Fauziah, D., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2018). Mathematics authentic assessment on statistics learning: The case for student mini projects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012123. Fjørtoft, H. (2020). Multimodal digital classroom assessments. Computers & Education, 152, Article 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103892. Foster, C. (2022). Implementing confidence assessment in low-stakes, formative mathematics assessments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1411-1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10207-9. Gezer, T., Wang, C., Polly, A., Martin, C., Pugalee, D., & Lambert, R. (2021). The relationship between formative assessment and summative assessment in primary grade mathematics classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5), 673-685. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.220. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |