UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Augmented Reality (AR)is a technology that augments reality with two‑ or three‑dimensional computer‑generated imagery (CGI), objects, or information, and allows users to interact efficiently. The aim ofthis study was to measure the effectiveness ofAugmented Reality (AR) application in teachingHuman Body anatomy and determine the attention and confidence level which contributes to learning motivation among sports school students before and after using a particular AR application online, hybrid and face to face teaching. This pre‑post experimental study conducted among 32 sports school students in BukitJalil Sports School who registered for human anatomy subject. A written testwas conducted on the topic of human body anatomy after teaching using the traditional method. Then the same group of pupils learned human body anatomy using Augmented Reality application. Apost‑testwas conducted to evaluate the understanding and achievement. The pair sample t‑testwas used to determine the effectiveness between both methods. The subjects also answered a five scale Likert questionnaire to determine the attention, confidence and motivation level in learning through AR application. The paired sample t‑test showed significant differences between pre‑ and post‑test, with t(31) = −7.44, p = 0.00 (p < 0.05). This showed thatlearning through theAugmented Reality application is much easier and more efficient compared to the traditional method using textbooks, pictures, and diagrams. The descriptive analysis showed the mean score of attention (4.31), confidence (3.98) and motivation (4.13) are high. Results demonstrated positive significant correlation between the mean score of attention (r = 0.75), and confidence (r = 0.73)toward motivation (r = 0.84)(p < 0.001). These findings showed high levels of attention, self‑confidence, and motivation among sports school studentswhile learning using augmented reality compared to learning through the traditional method.In conclusion this study proved that AR application can increase motivation in the learning process and enhance academic performance inHuman Anatomy and also other subjects. |
| References |
Kurniawan, Y. I., & Kusuma, A. F. S. (2021). Aplikasi Augmented Reality Untuk Pembelajaran Salat Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput, 8(1), 7. Jamali, S. S., Shiratuddin, M. F., Wong, K. W., & Oskam, C. L. (2015). Utilising mobileaugmented reality for learning human anatomy. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 659668. Preim, B., Saalfeld, P., Hansen, C. (2021). Virtual and Augmented Reality for Educational Anatomy. In: Uhl, JF., Jorge, J., Lopes, D.S., Campos, P.F. (eds) Digital Anatomy. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783030619053_16. Sirakaya M. and Sirakaya, D. A. (2018),“Trends in educational AR studies: a systematic review,” Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 60–74. Billinghurst, M. Clark, A. & G. Lee, (2015), “A survey of AR,” Foundations and Trends in HumanComputer Interaction, 8, 73–272. Holzinger, A., Nischelwitzer, A., & Meisenberger, M. (2005). Lifelonglearning support by mlearning: example scenarios. eLearn, 2005(11), 2.doi: 10.1145/1125280.1125284 Norman, H., Din, R., & Nordin, N. (2011). A preliminary study of an authentic ubiquitous learning environment for higher education. learning, 3(4), 8994. Nuanmeesri, S., Kadmateekarun, P., & Poomhiran, L. (2019). Augmented Reality to Teach Human Heart Anatomy and Blood Flow. Turkish Online Journal of Educational TechnologyTOJET, 18(1), 1524. Jain, N., Youngblood, P., Hasel, M., & Srivastava, S. (2017). An augmented reality tool for learning spatial anatomy on mobile devices. Clinical Anatomy, 30(6), 736741. Henssen, D. J., van den Heuvel, L., De Jong, G., Vorstenbosch, M. A., van Cappellen van Walsum, A. M., Van den Hurk, M. M.,... & Bartels, R. H. (2020). Neuroanatomy learning: Augmented reality vs. cross sections. Anatomical sciences education, 13(3), 353365. Loorbach, N. Peters, O. Karreman, J. and Steehouder, M. (2015), “Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a selfdirected instructional setting aimed at working with technology,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 204–218. Malik, S. “Effectiveness of arcs model of motivational design to overcome non completion rate of students in distance education, (2014), ” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 194–200. Budiman, R. D. A. (2016), “Developing learning media based on AR (AR) to improve learning motivation,” Journal of Education,1(2), 89–94. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |