UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
![]() |
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Self-efficacy in English language learning is directly correlated with the success of the students in learning English, the models they follow at each level, the encouragement and suggestions received by their groups, and the evaluations their teachers provide them. As an innovation for the traditional teaching method, the flipped classroom teaching model can affect the formation of self-efficacy in English language learning from the above four aspects. It has a theoretically positive promotion of self-efficacy. The study employed a quasi-experimental approach and semi-structured interviews to investigate whether the flipped classroom teaching model has a positive impact on self-efficacy in English language learning of the students of Chinese higher vocational colleges. The results showed that flipped classroom had a significant positive impact on students’ self-efficacy in English language learning. © The Author(s) 2024. |
References |
Nguyen DT, Kieuthi TC. New trends in technology application in education and capacities of universities lecturers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev. 2020;10(3):1709–14. Ministry of Education of China. Guidelines on further promoting the development of informatisation in vocational education. 2017.https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-09/12/content_5224526.htm?eqid=ac16b76400000a3300000006645a22cf. Accessed 30 Jan 2024. Lu L. The application of “one main and three auxiliaries” piston teaching in paper clothing design. Educ Res Rev Classr Obs. 2011;3:49–52. Chen X. Middle school English teaching strategies based on the development of students’ independent learning ability. Tianjin Educ. 2023;14:61–3. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012. Hwang GJ, Lai CL, Wang SY. Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. J Comput Educ. 2015;2(4):449–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0. Hsia L, Lin Y, Hwang G. A creative problem solving-based flipped learning strategy for promoting students’ performing creativity, skills and tendencies of creative thinking and collaboration. Br J Edu Technol. 2021;52(4):1771–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13073. Wang G. On the application of cooperative learning in college English teaching. Int Educ Stud. 2020;13(6):62–6. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n6p62. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997. Bandura A. Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. Schunk DH, DiBenedetto MK. Academic self-efficacy. In: Allen KA, Furlong MJ, Vella-Brodrick D, Suldo SM, editors. Handbook of positive psychology in schools. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2022. p. 268–82. Wang Y. The effects of self-efficacy, motivation, perceptions and strategies on English language performance. J Xi’ Int Stud Univ. 2006;14(3):51–3. Algarni B, Lortie-Forgues H. An evaluation of the impact of flipped-classroom teaching on mathematics proficiency and self-efficacy in Saudi Arabia. Br J Edu Technol. 2023;54(1):414–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13250. Yang M, She D, Xu Q, Zhang W, Qu C, Hu X. Inefficiencies of augmented reality for different sexes and grades in Chinese vocational education. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):21290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48727-9. Lin X, Hu Y, Chen C, Zhu Y. The influence of social support on higher vocational students’ learning motivation: the mediating role of belief in a just world and the moderating role of gender. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;26(16):1471–83. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S402643. Sulindra E, Hartani T, Cendra AN. Psychological-related challenges in speaking: experience of vocational students. J Educ Res Eval. 2023;7(3):370–9. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i3.66587. Kelly S, Price H. Vocational education: a clean slate for disengaged students? Soc Sci Res. 2009;38:810–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.05.002. Mazur E. Peer instruction: a user’s manual. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1997. Lage MJ, Platt GJ, Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J Econ Educ. 2000;31(1):30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759. Strayer JF. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learn Environ Res. 2012;15(2):171–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4. Ekmekci E. The flipped writing classroom in Turkish EFL context: a comparative study on a new model. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2017;18(2):151–67. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.306566. Mok HN. 2014 Teaching tip: the flipped classroom. J Inform Syst Educ. 2014;25(1):7–11. Lo CK, Hew KF. A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017;12(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2. Davies RS, Dean DL, Ball N. Flipped the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ Tech Res Dev. 2013;61(4):563–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |