UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
![]() |
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Given the limited empirical evidence on conceptualizing authenticity in food, this study explored the dimensionality of perceived authenticity in food within a state fair setting. By using a rigorous scale development procedure through a mixed method, this study developed and validated a set of scales to measure authenticity in food and confirmed four underlying factors of food authenticity: unique, original, local, and traditional. The findings provide a foundation for scale development along with theoretical insights on authentic food with the four dimensions identified. Practically, this study provides managerial guidelines for state fair organizers to better evaluate food authenticity concerning the four dimensions, plan strategic marketing tools that could attract more consumers, and improve their offerings to visitors’ authentic experiences. © 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. |
References |
Aaker, J., & Drolet, A. (1996). To thine own self be true: The meaning of” sincerity” in brands and its impact on consumer evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 392. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411. Ballantyne, R., Warren, A., & Nobbs, K. (2006). The evolution of brand choice. Journal of Brand Management, 13(4–5), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540276. Berger, P. L. (1973, Spring). Sincerity and authenticity in modern society. The Public Interest, 31, 81. https://www.proquest.com/magazines/sincerity-authenticity-modern-society/docview/1298113425/se-2. Bessière, J. (1998). Local development and heritage: Traditional food and cuisine as tourist attractions in rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00061. Björk, P., & Kauppinen-Räisänen, H. (2016). Exploring the multi-dimensionality of travellers’ culinary-gastronomic experiences. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(12), 1260–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.868412. Bruhn, M., Schoenmüller, V., Schäfer, D., & Heinrich, D. (2012). Brand authenticity: Towards a deeper understanding of its conceptualization and measurement. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 567–576. Buchmann, A., Moore, K., & Fisher, D. (2010). Experiencing film tourism: Authenticity & fellowship. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(1), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.09.005. Buhalis, D., & Costa, C. (2006). Tourism business frontiers: Consumers, products and industry. Butterworth Heinemann. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980. Camus, S. (2004). Proposition d'échelle de mesure de l'authenticité perçue d'un produit alimentaire. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing (French Edition), 19(4), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/076737010401900407. Castéran, H., & Roederer, C. (2013). Does authenticity really affect behavior? The case of the Strasbourg Christmas market. Tourism Management, 36, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.11.012. Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110. Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90028-X. Cohen, E. (2007). The” postmodernization” of a mythical event: Naga fireballs on the Mekong river. Tourism Culture & Communication, 7(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830407782212493. Crang, M. (1996). Living history: Magic kingdoms or a quixotic quest for authenticity?. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00070-4. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |