Patterns in assignment submission times: Analysis of factors contributing to undergraduate students’ commitment to core-curriculum related course

Siti Musliha Mat Rasid

Patterns in assignment submission times: Analysis of factors contributing to undergraduate students’ commitment to core-curriculum related course

AVAILABLE Article 262 Views

Back to search

Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files

General Information Cached

Title

Patterns in assignment submission times: Analysis of factors contributing to undergraduate students’ commitment to core-curriculum related course

Type

Article

Main Author

Siti Musliha Mat Rasid

Subject

GV Recreation Leisure

ISBN

2405-8440

Language Code

eng

Bibliographic Details

Place of Production

Tanjung Malim

Publisher

Fakulti Sains Sukan & Kejurulatihan

Year of publication

2024

Notes

Heliyon

Dissertation Note

Other

Degree Type

Others

Corporate Name

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

HTTP Link

Access Web Resource

Abstract

Co-curricular activities equip students with essential skills and knowledge for personal and professional growth. Despite their importance, many students exert minimal effort to complete the assigned tasks. Instructors perceive that the lack of emphasis on final exams in co-curricular subjects reduces student effort and commitment. Moreover, poor time management and lack of effort in completing tasks have increased across various subjects in recent years. Therefore, it is important to investigate the factors that contribute to student commitment towards co-curricular subjects. In this study, the submission status of 339 tasks was retrieved from the student learning system to measure student commitment based on whether tasks were submitted on time, delayed, or not submitted. A chi-square test f was used to investigate the relationship between students’ demographic characteristics and their commitment. The findings revealed a significant association between student commitment and the type of task given (p < 0.001). Students were more likely to submit presentations on time compared to written assignments. Projects were more likely to be delayed, while written assignments had a high frequency of no submission. Age was a significant predictor of commitment (p < 0.05), with students over 20 more likely to submit on time and students under 20 more likely to ignore submission. Gender was also a significant predictor of commitment (p < 0.001), with female students having a higher percentage and frequency of on-time submissions while male students having a higher number of no submissions. However, no significant association was found between the study year and commitment (p > 0.05), indicating that the year of the study could not determine the level of commitment to the course. Overall, these findings could be used to guide the preparation of tasks and assignments in co-curricular subjects to enhance student commitment and holistic development. © 2024 The Authors

References

T. Maraseni, G. Cockfield, Analysis of ‘on-time’ and ‘late’ assignment submitter students, Int. J. Bus. Manag. Educ. 14 (2006) 14–25.

M.M. Tamada, R. Giusti, JF. de M. Netto, Predicting students at risk of dropout in technical course using LMS logs, Electronics 11 (2022) 468.

J. Mohammadi Bytamar, O. Saed, S. Khakpoor, Emotion regulation difficulties and academic procrastination, Front. Psychol. 11 (2020) 524588.

A.R. Pravita, P. Kuswandono, Writing anxiety and academic procrastination on undergraduate thesis writing: the role of self-regulation, JEELS 9 (2022) 1–25.

S. Rahimi, N.C. Hall, T.A. Pychyl, Attributions of responsibility and blame for procrastination behavior, Front. Psychol. 7 (2016) 1179.

R.M. Klassen, L.L. Krawchuk, S. Rajani, Academic procrastination of undergraduates: low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination, Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 33 (2008) 915–931.

K. Gregory, S. Moron-García, ´ Assignment submission, student behaviour and experience, Engl. Educ. 4 (2009) 16–28.

O. Chabaya, C. Chiome, R.A. Chabaya, Students’ failure to submit research projects on time: a case study from Masvingo Regional Centre at Zimbabwe Open University, Open Learn. J. Open, Distance e-Learn. 24 (2009) 211–221.

Rozental A, Forsstrom ¨ D, Hussoon A, et al. Procrastination among university students: differentiating severe cases in need of support from less severe cases. Front. Psychol.; 13.

U. Akpur, Predictive and explanatory relationship model between procrastination, motivation, anxiety and academic achievement, Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 17 (2017) 221.

I. Aznar-Díaz, J.-M. Romero-Rodríguez, A. García-Gonz´alez, et al., Mexican and Spanish university students’ Internet addiction and academic procrastination: correlation and potential factors, PLoS One 15 (2020) e0233655.

M. Balkis, E. Duru, Procrastination, self-regulation failure, academic life satisfaction, and affective well-being: underregulation or misregulation form, Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 31 (2016) 439–459.

C. Cavusoglu, H. Karatas, Academic procrastination of undergraduates: self-determination theory and academic motivation, Anthropology 20 (2015) 735–743.

B.-B. Chen, Academic procrastination and bedtime among Chinese undergraduates: the indirect and moderating effects of sensation seeking and goal disengagement, Curr. Psychol. 38 (2019) 187–193.

X. Tao, H. Hanif, H.H. Ahmed, et al., Bibliometric analysis and visualization of academic procrastination, Front. Psychol. (2021) 4391.

M. Haque, N.A.A. Rahman, M.A.A. Majumder, et al., Assessment of academic/non-academic factors and extracurricular activities influencing performance of medical students of faculty of medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia, Adv. Hum. Biol. 8 (2018) 3.

The NCES Fast Facts Tool Provides Quick Answers to Many Education Questions, National Center for Education Statistics, 2011. http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80. accessed 6 April 2023.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Home Page, Part of the, U.S. Department of Education, 2009. http://nces.ed.gov/. accessed 6 April 2023.

K. Nordby, K.B. Klingsieck, F. Svartdal, Do procrastination-friendly environments make students delay unnecessarily? Soc. Psychol. Educ. 20 (2017) 491–512.

T.N. Maraseni, G. Cockfield, Analysis of’on-time’and’late’assignment submitter students, Int. J. Bus. Manag. Educ. 14 (2006) 14–25.

V. Eswaramoorthi, G. Kuan, M.R. Abdullah, et al., Design and validation of a virtual physical education and sport science–related course: a learner’s engagement approach, Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 19 (2022) 7636.

I. Hassan, R.M. Musa, M.N. Latiff Azmi, et al., Analysis of climate change disinformation across types, agents and media platforms, Inf. Dev. (2023) 02666669221148693.

Musa RM, Hassan I, Abdullah MR, et al. A longitudinal analysis of injury characteristics among elite and amateur tennis players at different tournaments from electronic newspaper reports. Front. Public Health; 10.

A.B. Simmons, A.F. Heckler, Grades, grade component weighting, and demographic disparities in introductory physics, Phys Rev Phys Educ Res 16 (2020) 20125.

S. Salehi, S. Cotner, S.M. Azarin, et al., Gender performance gaps across different assessment methods and the underlying mechanisms: the case of incoming preparation and test anxiety, in: Frontiers in Education, Frontiers Media SA, 2019, p. 107.

H.N. Keiser, P.R. Sackett, N.R. Kuncel, et al., Why women perform better in college than admission scores would predict: exploring the roles of conscientiousness and course-taking patterns, J. Appl. Psychol. 101 (2016) 569.

R. Henderson, D. Hewagallage, J. Follmer, et al., Mediating role of personality in the relation of gender to self-efficacy in physics and mathematics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18 (2022) 10143.

C. Nunes, T. Oliveira, F. de O. Santini, et al., A weight and meta-analysis on the academic achievement of high school students, Educ. Sci. 12 (2022) 287.

E. Albert, T.A. Petrie, G. Moore Ew, Achievement motivation and grit’s perseverance of effort among collegiate athletes, Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. (2023) 1–16.

S. Hassel, N. Ridout, An investigation of first-year students’ and lecturers’ expectations of university education, Front. Psychol. 8 (2018) 2218.

R.M. Musa, J.A.P. Kannan, U.K.W. Nek, et al., Appraisal of wellness-lifestyle status among Malaysian undergraduate students: a cross-sectional and gender-based wellness survey, J. Appl. Pharmaceut. Sci. 10 (2020) 82–87.

R.M. Musa, M.Z. Suhaimi, A. Musa, et al., Predicting students academic performance from wellness status markers using machine learning techniques, Indian J. Sci. Technol. 13 (2020) 2047–2055.

H.S. Rad, S. Samadi, F.M. Sirois, et al., Mindfulness intervention for academic procrastination: a randomized control trial, Learn. Indiv Differ 101 (2023) 102244.

F. Di Nocera, R. De Piano, M. Rullo, et al., A lack of focus, not task avoidance, makes the difference: work routines in procrastinators and non-procrastinators, Behav. Sci. 13 (2023) 333.

M. Gilani, H.N. Ismail, A.P. Gilakjani, Impacts of learning reading strategy on students’ reading comprehension proficiency, Int. J. Lang. Learn. Appl. Ling. World 1 (2012) 72–87.

J. Chen Hsieh, J.S. Lee, Digital storytelling outcomes, emotions, grit, and perceptions among EFL middle school learners: robot-assisted versus PowerPointassisted presentations, Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 36 (2023) 1088–1115.

H. Ho, L. Nguyen, N. Dang, et al., Understanding student attitudes toward delivering English oral presentations, Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 22 (2023) 256–277.