Government direction on the vocational school’s performance evaluation in Indonesia and Malaysia: Some notes from Islamic education’s perspective

Irdayanti Mat Nashir

Government direction on the vocational school’s performance evaluation in Indonesia and Malaysia: Some notes from Islamic education’s perspective

AVAILABLE Article 367 Views

Back to search

Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files

General Information Cached

Title

Government direction on the vocational school’s performance evaluation in Indonesia and Malaysia: Some notes from Islamic education’s perspective

Type

Article

Main Author

Irdayanti Mat Nashir

Subject

BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc

ISBN

1412-0992

Language Code

eng

Bibliographic Details

Place of Production

Tanjung Malim

Publisher

Fakulti Teknikal & Vokasional

Year of publication

2024

Notes

Millah: Journal of Religious Studies

Dissertation Note

Other

Degree Type

Others

Corporate Name

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

HTTP Link

Access Web Resource

Abstract

The vocational high school principal is a determining factor for the progress or failure of a school. Therefore, the principal's performance evaluation must be optimal. This study explores the government direction on this performance evaluation in two neighboring countries: Indonesia and Malaysia. The research method uses a qualitative approach, by interviewing both school supervisors and principals, and analyzing documents. The steps are 1) collection of resources through multi techniques; 2) reducing data with the aim of simplifying and categorizing data; 3) presenting data in the form of qualitative descriptions; 4) drawing conclusions and 5) compiling research reports and formulate comparative research findings. For Indonesia, once a year, the School Supervisor and a team from the Education Office in Indonesia are responsible for carrying out the review of the performance of the principals of vocational schools. The current evaluation of the principal of a vocational high school in Malaysia is a component of the overall review of the school's performance. Standard of Educational Quality in Malaysia is the name given to this evaluation, and it has been in effect since 2017. Standard 1 Kepemimpin is the most important benchmark to consider in relation to principal performance (Leadership). The performance evaluation in Indonesia seems still separated from school performance evaluation or accreditation. Although each evaluation scheme has its own format and purposes, the implementation could be made in such a concurrent time. Meanwhile in Malaysia, the principal performance is likely one of the evaluated aspects in the school performance evaluation (SKPM), especially Standard 1 Kepemimpinan (leadership) and Standard 2 Pengurusan Organisasi (organization management). © 2024, Program Studi Ilmu Agama Islam Program Magister, Universitas Islam Indonesia. All rights reserved.

References

Ahmad, S. (2021). Implementasi supervisi manajerial pengawas dalam meningkatkan kinerja guru PAI di MIN 4 Aceh Tenggara era Covid-19 [Implementation of supervisory managerial supervision in improving the performance of Islamic religious education teachers at MIN 4 Southeast Aceh in the Covid-19 era]. Mudabbir Journal Reserch and Education Studies, 1(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.56832/mudabbir.v1i1.3 .

Alwayi, Z. M., Embong, R., & Hashim, H. A. (2021). Perancangan Pengajaran Guru dalam Pembelajaran dan Pemudahcaraan: Satu Kajian Rintis [Teacher Teaching Planning in Learning and Facilitating: A Pilot Study]. Asian Journal of Civilizational Studies (AJOCS), 3(1), 11-18. http://ajocs.com/index.php/ajocs/article/view/61.

Andrea, D. L. (2022). Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Daerah Bidang Pendidikan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah [Implementation of Regional Autonomy in the Education Sector Based on Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government]. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 1(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v1i2.128.

Anwar, S., & Marlina, M. (2019). Kebijakan pemerintah terhadap pendidikan Islam di Indonesia (Zaman Orde Baru dan Reformasi) [Government policy towards Islamic education in Indonesia (New Order and Reform Era)]. Al-I’tibar: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.30599/jpia.v6i2.643.

Armstrong, M. (2016). Armstrong’s handbook of management and leadership for HR: Developing effective people skills for better leadership and management. Kogan Page.

Ayob, A. (2012). Education administrators’ professional standards: The Malaysian perspective. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 2(1), 60-74. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JRPPTTE/article/view/146.

Bakar, A. (2011). Supervisi pendidikan agama Islam (Pembinaan guru agama madrasah / sekolah) [Supervision of Islamic religious education (Development of madrasa / school religious teachers)]. Sosial Budaya, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24014/sb.v8i1.344.

Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross‐national analysis of the “Heyneman‐Loxley effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/341159.

Balikçi, A., & Aypay, A. (2018). An investigation of school principalship in the context of bureaucracy. Turkish Studies (Elektronik), 13(11), 1535–1560. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpBd05UQXhNUT09/an-investigation-of-school-principalship-in-the-context-of-bureaucracy.

Banathy, B. H. (1992). A systems view of education: Concepts and principles for effective practice. Educational Technology Publ.

Chan, Y. F., & Kaur, S. G. (2009). Leadership characteristics of an excellent principal in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 2(4), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n4p106.

Cheng, L. M., & Nasri, N. M. (2022). Cabaran Guru Sekolah Rendah Pedalaman Terhadap Penggunaan Standard 4 (PdPC) SKPMg2 Dalam Menilai PdPR. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(4), 364–373. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/16748.

Chmielewski, A. K. (2019). The Global Increase in the Socioeconomic Achievement Gap, 1964 to 2015. American Sociological Review, 84(3), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419847165.

Chudzaifah, I. (2019). Supervisi pendidikan Islam: Telaah model pengawasan madrasah di Kota Sorong [Islamic education supervision: Examining the madrasa supervision model in Sorong City]. Al-Fikr: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.32489/alfikr.v5i2.23.

Davies, I., Grammes, T., & Kuno, H. (2017). Citizenship education and character education “character is the continuously defined way of how man relates to the world” (Herbart 1919, p. 524). Journal of Social Science Education, 16(3), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v16-i3-1716.

Davies, S., Lorello, G. R., Downey, K., & Friedman, Z. (2017). Effective learning environments & the process of creating and maintaining an online continuing education tool. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 8, 447–452. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S136348.