|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| The research reveals the impact of the course on English and English for mathematics conversations, highlighting improvements and identifying challenges in expressing mathematical ideas. Overall, it aims to analyze code-switching types and reasons in the English for Mathematics course context. Method: This qualitative case study explores code-switching in English for Mathematics courses, unveiling the nuanced types employed by lecturers and students during classroom interactions. From tag-switching to intrasentential and inter-sentential code-switching, the classroom becomes a dynamic linguistic canvas. The study investigates motivations behind this interplay, including internal factors like language proficiency and fear of linguistic missteps, and external influences like participant dynamics and contextual nuances. Research Findings and Discussions: Although this course is due in English, the use of the Indonesian language also happens for both lecturers and students. The occurrences of code-switching itself are on the type of tag switching, intra-sentential, and inter-sentential switching. Internal and external factors influence code-switching in classroom interactions. Internal factors, such as language ability and preferences, impact students' comfort with using specific languages. External factors, including participants, context, and lesson topics, also shape code-switching occurrences in educational settings. Research Implications: The research implied to improve students' English proficiency in mathematics, emphasizing understanding mathematical terms and delivering presentations in English. By implementing the code switching. Originality/Value: This research offers lecturers and students point of views related to the types of code switching used by both of them in the process of teaching and learning as well as it is also reasons for using code switching where it contributes for both of them to understand and master the English for Mathematics Course. Then, this exploration offers insights into the symbiotic relationship between language and subject matter within the English for Mathematics classroom, revealing the vibrant tapestry of this linguistic and educational dynamic. |
| References |
Amalia, I. (2016). Bilingualism.Loquen, 5(1), 1689–1699. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rce/article/download/1659/1508%0Ahttp://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/qre/article/view/1348%5Cnhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500799708666915%5Cnhttps://mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Educa. Anastassiou, F., & Andreou, G. (2017). Factors associated with the code mixing and code switching of multilingual children: An overview. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (LLC), 4(3), 13–26. Ciesielska, M., & Jemielniak, D. (2017). Qualitative methodologies in organization studies. Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies, 2(December), 1–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches(3rd ed.). sage Publications, Inc. 10.24071/ijhs.2019.020205. Dharin, A., & Nurwangid, M. (2024). Developing of Multiple Intelligences-Based Elementary School Learning Kits To Improve Student Creativity. RGSA –Revista de Gestão Social E Ambienta, 18(7), 1–27. Dwika Herdiawan, R. (2017). The Contributive Roles of Bilingualism in English Language Teaching. Journal of English Language Learning, 1(1), 57–61. Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs,H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. SAGE Open, 4(1), 215824401452263. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633. Engliana. (2015). An Overview of English Language in Indonesian Advertising in Printed Media. Journal of English Language and Culture, 5(2), 123–132. Fanani, A., & Ma’u, J. A. R. Z. (2018). Code switching and code mixing in English learning process. LingTera, 5(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v5i1.14438. Fathimah, D. N. (2016). Why Is There Code Switching in Efl Classroom? : a Case Study in a Vocational School in Cimahi West-Java. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v16i1.3063. Fither, Ammade, S., & Amaluddin. (2023). Bilingualism Effect in Learning English Process (Study At Sma 3 Tana-Toraja). JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program, 4(02), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.47435/jle.v4i02.2321. Grant, A. (2008). Defining bilingualism. Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy Development, January 2008, 1–7. http://www.literacyencyclopedia.ca/pdfs/topic.php?topId=236. Hamid, S. M. (2016). Code-Switching Between the Teachers and the Students of the Conversation. Exposure : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 5(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.26618/ejpbi.v5i2.846. Hilmi, M. (2020). Alih Kode Dan Campur Kode Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Kelas Balet ( Ballet Class ).Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942. Jamshidi, A., & Navehebrahim, M. (2013). Learners Use of Code Switching in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom 1. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 186–190. Kartika, D., Rahardi, R. K., Aziz, M., & Rahmat, W. (2023). Depicting reflections of power on illocutionary acts of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe ’ s speeches on Covid -19. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i2.63078. Kemal, E., Rahmat, W., & Damayanti, M. (2020). Conflict of Parents On Social Media Towards Their Children Online School Assignments During The Covid 19 Pandemic. Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(3), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2020.v5i3.5424. Khatimah, H., & Anwar Korompot, C. (2023). Code Switching and Code Mixing in the Efl Teaching Learning Processes (a Sociolinguistic Analysis). PERFORMANCE: Journal of English Education and Literature, 2(1), 110–121. Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. Guilford Publications. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |