Effects of digital game-based learning on product innovation skills development: Comparative analysis between applied arts and applied science undergraduate students

Ahmad Zamzuri Mohamad Ali

QR Code Link :
Type :	Article
Subject :	H Social Sciences (General)
ISBN :	1675-8110
Main Author :	Ahmad Zamzuri Mohamad Ali
Title :	Effects of digital game-based learning on product innovation skills development: Comparative analysis between applied arts and applied science undergraduate students
Hits :	49

Place of Production :	Tanjung Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Seni, Kelestarian & Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :	2024
Notes :	Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link :	Click to view web link
PDF Full Text :	You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Purpose This study investigates how Digital Game-based Learning (DGBL) impacts the development of product innovation skills among undergraduate students, comparing the performance of students across different disciplines—Applied Arts (AA) and Applied Sciences (AS). Methodology The study involved 80 undergraduate students: 40 students pursuing an AA degree and 40 pursuing an AS degree. The design of the innovation game incorporated cognitivist learning strategies based on Bloom’s taxonomy. Innovation skills were evaluated through an open-ended achievement test. Findings The study revealed that DGBL effectively enhances product innovation skills by integrating cognitive strategies, and Bloom’s Taxonomy into guided answers, and open-ended achievement tests. AS students excelled in problem identification and idea creation, while AA students emphasised psychological, emotional factors and visualisation representation. Significance The findings suggest promoting interdisciplinary collaboration among educators and policymakers to integrate aesthetics and technological knowledge. This approach enables students from diverse disciplines to leverage their strengths for holistic innovation. For practical applications, game designers and educators can model product innovation steps, offer guided answers, track progress and award virtual badges. The open-ended achievement test is a valuable tool for assessing innovation skills across diverse student backgrounds. Future studies should focus on integrating cognitivism and constructivism in collaborative learning, using generative AI-assisted assessment, and bridging virtual idea generation with real-world product idea pitching using voice-input technologies. In conclusion, this study provides practical guidelines for implementing DGBL in product innovation, influencing education, policy-making, and design practices. © (2024), (Universiti Utara Malaysia Press). All rights reserved.

References

Alsawaier, R. S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.

Barr, M. (2018). Student attitudes to games-based skills development: Learning from video games in higher education. Computers in Human Behaviour, 80(283-294). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.030.

Bawa, P. (2019). Game On! Investigating digital game-based versus gamified learning in higher education. International Journal of GBL, 10(31), 16-46. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2020070102.

Bereitschaft, B. (2021). Commercial city building games as pedagogical tools: What have we learned? Journal of Geography in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.2007524.

Blanco-Herrera, J., Gentile, D., & Rokkum, J. (2019). Video Games can increase creativity, but with caveats. Creativity Research Journal, 31(2), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1594524.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Cognitive Domain. (1), pp (20-24). McKay, New York.

Broekhoven, K. V., Cropley, D., & Seegers, P. (2020). Differences in creativity across art and STEM students: We are more alike than unalike. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100707.

Bunduchi, R., Mitra, C. C., Salanta, I. I. & Crisan, E. L. (2022). Digital product innovation approaches in entrepreneurial firms – the role of entrepreneurs’ cognitive frames. Te c h n o l o g i c a l Forecasting & Social Change, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121343.

Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2021). Active learning. In Cambridge Assessment International Education. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/271174-active-learning.pdf.

Chang, C. Y., Kao, C. H., Hwang, G. J., & Lin, F. H. (2020). From experiencing to critical thinking: A contextual GBL approach to improving nursing students’ performance in electrocardiogram training. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 68, 1225-1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09723-x.

CONVAI-Conversational AI for Virtual Worlds. (2024). Embodied AI characters for virtual worlds. https://convai.com/Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

Creswell, J., & Clark, V. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London, United Kingdom: Sage.

Cristina, P., Thais, G. T., Juan-Jose, N. S. (2021). Boosting entrepreneurial intention of university students: Is a serious business game the key? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100506.

Eggers, F., Lovelace, K., & Kraft, F. (2017). Fostering creativity through critical thinking: The case of business start-up simulations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(3), 266-276.https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12225.

Esteban, F., Torralbo, J., Casas, D., & García, M. (2020). Web gamification with problem simulators for teaching engineering. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(1), 135-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09221-2.

Fleury, S., Blanchard, P., & Richir, S. (2021). A study of the effects of a natural virtual environment on creativity during a product design activity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100828.

Flick, U. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Collection. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.

Gampell, A. V., Gaillard, J., Parsons, M., Dé, L. L., & Hinchliffe, G. (2024). Participatory minecraft mapping: Fostering students participation in disaster awareness. Entertainment Computing, 48, 100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100605.

Holmström, J., & Carroll, N. (2024). How organizations can innovate with generative AI. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.02.010.

Horng, J. S., Hsiao, H. L., Liu, C. H., Chou, S. F., & Chung, Y. C. (2021). Learning innovative entrepreneurship: Developing an influential curriculum for undergraduate hospitality students. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports & Tourism Education, 100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100289.

Huang, Y.-M., Silitonga, L. M., & Wu, T.-T. (2022). Applying a business simulation game in a flipped classroom to enhance engagement, learning achievement, and higher-order thinking skills. Computers & Education, 183, 104494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104494.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page