UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :Article
Subject :L Education (General)
ISBN :2405-8440
Main Author :Nor Shahida Azali
Title :A systematic literature review of brownfield sustainability: Dimensions, indicators, and stakeholders
Hits :123
Place of Production :Tanjung Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains Kemanusiaan
Year of Publication :2024
Notes :Heliyon
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link : Click to view web link
PDF Full Text :You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
In recent years, the necessity of brownfield redevelopment has garnered increasing attention in academic literature. This paper employs a systematic review methodology to analyse current perspectives on brownfield sustainability, with a focus on dimensions, indicators, and stakeholders. Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology, this study systematically reviews 40 articles from the WoS and Scopus databases. The findings highlight a shift towards prioritising ecological resilience and cultural preservation, alongside traditional economic, environmental, and social dimensions. The complexity of sustainability indicators is discussed, emphasising their crucial role in assessing redevelopment success. The review also identifies key stakeholders, including governments, developers, and community groups, who prioritise these dimensions due to their impact on sustainable urban development and community well-being. Future research should further explore cultural, ecological, and governance aspects, and refine sustainability indicators to more accurately capture the multidimensional performance of redevelopment projects. This analysis offers valuable insights for both academia and practice, advocating for policies that emphasise inclusive stakeholder engagement and comprehensive sustainability assessments to optimise brownfield reuse. © 2024 The Authors

References

J. Palmer, Environmental Education in the 21st Century: Theory, Practice, Progress and Promise, Routledge, 2002.

G.C. Wedding, D. Crawford-Brown, Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building, J. Environ. Manag. 85 (2) (2007) 483–495.

J. Elkington, I.H. Rowlands, Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business, Altern. J. 25 (4) (1999) 42.

United Nations General Assembly, Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, vol. 1, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, 2015, p. 41.

N. Ahmad, Y. Zhu, Z. Ullah, M. Iqbal, K. Hussain, R.I. Ahmed, Sustainable solutions to facilitate brownfield redevelopment projects in emerging countries – Pakistani Scenario, Land Use Pol. 109 (2021).

H. Ibrahim, K. Al-Hagla, D. Nassar, Towards a sustainable city: brownfields as a potential for urban development, J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 67 (8) (2020) 1903–1922.

M.N. Fatemi, T. Rahman, Regeneration of the Hazaribagh urban brownfield: an imperative for Dhaka’s sustainable urban development, Urbani Izziv 26 (2) (2015) 132–145.

A. Mehdipour, H.R. Nia, The role of brownfield development in sustainable urban regeneration, Journal of Sustainable Development Studies 4 (2) (2013).

P. Tedd, J. Charles, R. Driscoll, Sustainable brownfield re-development—risk management, Eng. Geol. 60 (1–4) (2001) 333–339.

K.R. Yount, What are brownfields? Finding a conceptual definition, Environ. Pract. 5 (1) (2003) 25–33.

N. Ahmad, Y. Zhu, L. Hongli, J. Karamat, M. Waqas, S.M.T. Mumtaz, Mapping the obstacles to brownfield redevelopment adoption in developing economies: Pakistani perspective, Land Use Pol. 91 (2020) 104374.

C.A. De Sousa, Urban brownfields redevelopment in Canada: the role of local government, The Canadian Geographer/Le G´eographe canadien 50 (3) (2006) 392–407.

S. Bartke, S. Martinat, ´ P. Klusa´ˇcek, L. Pizzol, F. Alexandrescu, B. Frant´ al, A. Critto, A. Zabeo, Targeted selection of brownfields from portfolios for sustainable regeneration: user experiences from five cases testing the timbre brownfield prioritization tool, J. Environ. Manag. 184 (2016) 94–107.

C.A. De Sousa, Measuring the public costs and benefits of brownfield versus greenfield development in the Greater Toronto area, Environ. Plann. Plann. Des. 29 (2) (2002) 251–280.

S. Tiesdell, Brownfields Redevelopment and the Quest for Sustainability, Emerald Group Publishing, 2008.

A. Cundy, R. Bardos, M. Puschenreiter, M. Mench, V. Bert, W. Friesl-Hanl, I. Müller, X. Li, N. Weyens, N. Witters, Brownfields to green fields: realising wider benefits from practical contaminant phytomanagement strategies, J. Environ. Manag. 184 (2016) 67–77.

L. Loures, E. Vaz, Exploring expert perception towards brownfield redevelopment benefits according to their typology, Habitat Int. 72 (2018) 66–76.

Y. Song, N. Kirkwood, C. ˇ Maksimovi´c, X. Zheng, D. O’Connor, Y. Jin, D. Hou, Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities: a review, Sci. Total Environ. 663 (2019) 568–579.

S.L. Coffin, A. Shepherd, Barriers to brownfield redevelopment: lessons learned from two great Lakes States, Publ. Works Manag. Pol. 2 (3) (1998) 258–266.

A. Fernandes, J. Figueira de Sousa, J.P. Costa, B. Neves, Mapping stakeholder perception on the challenges of brownfield sites’ redevelopment in Waterfronts: the Tagus Estuary, Eur. Plann. Stud. 28 (12) (2020) 2447–2464.

J. Hollander, N. Kirkwood, J. Gold, Principles of Brownfield Regeneration: Cleanup, Design, and Reuse of Derelict Land, Island Press, 2010.

B. Vanheusden, Recent developments in European policy regarding brownfield remediation, Environ. Pract. 11 (4) (2009) 256–262.

I. Linkov, A. Varghese, S. Jamil, T.P. Seager, G. Kiker, T. Bridges, Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: a Framework for Structuring Remedial Decisions at Contaminated Sites, Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making, Springer, 2004, pp. 15–54.

T. Dixon, M. Raco, P. Catney, D.N. Lerner, Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: Liveable Places from Problem Spaces, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

C. De Sousa, Sustainable Brownfield Development: Building a Sustainable Future on Sites of Our Polluting Past, Routledge, 2021.

U. Ferber, D. Grimski, K. Millar, P. Nathanail, Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report, University of Nottingham: L & Quality Management Group, 2006.

E. Paull, The Environmental and Economic Impacts of Brownfields Redevelopment, 2008. Northeast Midwest.

M. Howland, Employment effects of brownfield redevelopment: what do we know from the literature? J. Plann. Lit. 22 (2) (2007) 91–107.

H. Pavolov´a, T. Bakal´ ar, A. Tokarˇcík, Ľ. Kozakov ´ a, ´ T. Pastyrˇcak, ´ An economic analysis of brownfield and greenfield industrial parks investment projects: a case study of Eastern Slovakia, Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 18 (7) (2021) 3472.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.