A review of teaching and learning approach in implementing Project-Based Learning (PBL) with Computational Thinking (CT)

Aslina Saad

Abstract

This study delves into the integration of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Computational Thinking (CT) to enhance 21st century learning. Through a Narrative Literature Review (NLR), pivotal strategies for effective implementation are identified. These include fostering collaborative pedagogy, employing visualization tools, embracing diverse inquiry approaches, providing scaffolding, integrating local materials, and incorporating framework elements. The findings highlight the significance of comprehensive frameworks and underscore areas for further research to enrich teaching practices. By adapting the PRISMA framework and reviewing relevant articles from 2017 to 2022, this study offers valuable insights for educators aiming to integrate PBL-CT successfully into their teaching methodologies. It emphasizes the need for constructivist and collaborative approaches to learning, along with the utilization of visualization tools to aid comprehension. Moreover, diverse inquiry approaches coupled with scaffolding techniques are crucial for effective learning outcomes. Integrating local materials and embracing framework elements further enhance the integration of PBL and CT. However, the study suggests that a more comprehensive framework addressing various aspects of PBL-CT integration remains underexplored, indicating a potential avenue for future research to enrich educational practices. © 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

References

Aksela, M., & Haatainen, O. (2019). Project-Based Learning (PBL) in practise: Active teachers’ views of its’ advantages and challenges. 5th International STEM in Education Conference Proceedings: Integrated Education for the Real World.

Aldabbus, S. (2018). Project-based learning: Implementation and challenges. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 6(3), 71–79.

An, X., & Qu, C. (2020). Blending teaching mode for computer courses in the background of emerging engineering education: A case study of principle and application of database. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(12), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i12.14867.

Anuar, N. H., Mohamad, F. S., & Minoi, J. L. (2020). Contextualising computational thinking: A case study in remote rural Sarawak Borneo. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.6.

Asunda, P. A. (2022). Infusing computer science in engineering and technology education: An integrated STEM perspective. Journal of Technology Studies, 44(1), 2–12. http://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v44i1.a.1

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43.

Bertacchini, F., Scuro, C., Pantano, P., & Bilotta, E. (2022). A project based learning approach for improving students’ computational thinking skills. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 442. http://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.720448.

Bonaiuti, G., Campitiello, L., Di Tore, S., & Marras, A. (2022). Educational robotics studies in Italian scientific journals: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 63. http://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1005669

Brown, N. C., Sentence, S., Crick, T., & Humpreys, S. (2014). Restart: The resurgence of computer science in UK. ACM Transaction on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(2), 9.

Camilleri, P. (2017). Minding the gap. Proposing a teacher learning-training framework for the integration of robotics in primary schools. Informatics in Education, 16(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2017.09.

Chiazzese, G., Arrigo, M., Chifari, A., Lonati, V., & Tosto, C. (2019). Educational robotics in primary school: Measuring the development of computational thinking skills with the Bebras tasks. Informatics, 6(4), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6040043.

Chiu, C. F. (2020). Facilitating K-12 teachers in creating apps by visual programming and project-based learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 15(01), 103. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i01.11013.

Condliffe, B. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review (Working Paper). MDRC. Dean, J. (1996). Beginning teaching in the secondary school. Open University Press.

Deep, S., Salleh, B. M., & Othman, H. (2019). Improving the soft skills of engineering undergraduates in Malaysia through problem-based approaches and e-learning applications. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 9(4), 662– 676. http://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-07-2018-0072.

Denning, P. J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998438.

Devane, B., & Squire, K. (2012). Activity theory in the learning technologies. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Routledge.

Dian, M. (2020). Student’s computational thinking skill in solving a problem of convergences or divergences of series in freedom of learning program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663, 5th Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (SENATIK) 2020. 12–13 August 2020, Semarang, Indonesia.

Efstratia, D. (2014). Experiential education through project based learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152 (2014), 1256–1261.

Eidin, E., Bielik, T., Touitou, I., Bowers, J., Mcintyre, C., & Damelin, D. (2019). Characterising advantages and challenges for students engaging in computational thinking and systems thinking through model construction. ICLS, 183–190.

Falkner, K., Vivian, R., & Falkner, N. (2014). The Australian digital technologies curriculum: Challenge and opportunity. Proceeding of the Sixteenth Australian Computing Education Conference, 148, 3–12. Australian Computer Society.

Finzer, W., Busey, A., & Kochevar, R. (2018). Data-driven inquiry in the PBL classroom: Linking maps, graphs, and tables in biology. The Science Teacher, 86(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst18_086_01_28.

Fioravanti, M. L., Sena, B., Paschoal, L. N., Silva, L. R., Allian, A. P., Nakagawa, E. Y., Souza, S. R. S., Isotani, S., & Barbosa, E. F. (2018). Integrating project based learning and project management for software engineering teaching: An experience report. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 806–811. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159599.

Freina, L., Bottino, R., & Ferlino, L. (2018a). Game programming in primary schools: Guidelines for a project-based learning path. European Conference on Games Based Learning.

Freina, L., Bottino, R., & Ferlino, L. (2018b). Visuospatial abilities training with digital games in a primary school. International Journal of Serious Games, 5(3), 23–35. http://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v5i3.240.

Gallagher, E. (2015, June, 9). Questioning techniques, a skill to enhance. https://mx.unoi.com/2015/06/09/questioningtechniques-a-skill-to-enhance/.

Gary, K. (2015). Project-based learning. Computer, 48(9), 98–100. http://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2015.268 González, R., González, P., & Fernández, J. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion. validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047.