UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) represents a significant threat to maternal health, particularly in developing countries, where it remains a leading cause of maternal mortality. Unfortunately, only 60% of pregnant women at high risk for PPH are identified, leaving 40% undetected until they experience PPH. To address this critical issue and ensure timely intervention, leveraging rapidly advancing technology with machine learning (ML) methodologies for maternal health prediction is imperative. This review synthesizes findings from 43 selected research articles, highlighting the predominant ML techniques employed in PPH prediction. Among these, logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) emerge as the most frequently utilized methods. By harnessing the power of ML, we aim to foster technological advancements in the healthcare sector, with a particular focus on maternal health and ultimately contribute to the reduction of maternal mortality rates worldwide. © 2024 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. |
| References |
WHO, WHO recommendations: Uterotonics for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/277276/9789241550420-eng.pdf. E. J. Watkins and K. Stem, “Postpartum hemorrhage,” Jornal of the American Academy Physician Associates, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 29–33, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000657164.11635.93. H. B. Ende et al., “Risk factors for atonic postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 305–323, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004228. Z.-M. Pubu et al., “Factors affecting the risk of postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women in Tibet health facilities,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 27, pp. 1–9, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.12659/MSM.928568. T. Amanuel, A. Dache, and A. Dona, “Postpartum hemorrhage and its associated factors among women who gave birth at Yirgalem General Hospital, Sidama Regional State, Ethiopia,” Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology, vol. 8, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/23333928211062777. W. R. Sheldon, J. Blum, J. P. Vogel, J. P. Souza, A. M. Gülmezoglu, and B. Winikoff, “Postpartum haemorrhage management, risks, and maternal outcomes: findings from the World Health Organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 121, no. s1, pp. 5–13, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12636. G. Carroli, C. Cuesta, E. Abalos, and A. M. Gulmezoglu, “Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 999–1012, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.08.004. G. Makuei, M. Abdollahian, and K. Marion, “Optimal profile limits for maternal mortality rates (MMR) influenced by haemorrhage and unsafe abortion in South Sudan,” Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2020, pp. 1–13, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/2793960. Kementerian RI, Profil kesehatan Indonesia 2020. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2020. Kemenkes RI., Profil Kesehatan Indonesia. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2021. B. L. Carr, M. Jahangirifar, A. E. Nicholson, W. Li, B. W. Mol, and S. Licqurish, “Predicting postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review of prognostic models,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 813–825, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1111/ajo.13599. A. Samera, “Association of postpartum hemorrhage complications with its risk factors and surgical treatment,” Meddocs, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1037–1041, 2022. M. N. Islam, S. N. Mustafina, T. Mahmud, and N. I. Khan, “Machine learning to predict pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 348, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04594-2. B. Mahesh, “Machine learning algorithms -a review,” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 381–386, 2020, doi: 10.21275/ART20203995. A. Bertini, R. Salas, S. Chabert, L. Sobrevia, and F. Pardo, “Using machine learning to predict complications in pregnancy: a systematic review,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 9, pp. 1–16, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.780389. A. Smiti, “When machine learning meets medical world: current status and future challenges,” Computer Science Review, vol. 37, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100280. G. Biagetti, P. Crippa, L. Falaschetti, G. Tanoni, and C. Turchetti, “A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for physiological signal classification,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 126, pp. 1977–1984, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procS.2018.07.255. Z. Man, “Comparative study of machine learning models to predict PPH,” Thesis, University of North Carolina, 2019. S. Lee, N. Mohr, N. Street, and P. Nadkarni, “Machine learning in relation to emergency medicine clinical and operational Scenarios: An overview,” Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 219–227, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.1.41244. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |