Exploring the integration of multi criteria decision analysis in the clean energy biodiesels applications: A systematic review and gap analysis

Garfan, Salem Abdullah Salem

QR Code Link :
Type :	Article
Subject :	T Technology (General)
ISBN :	0952-1976
Main Author :	Garfan, Salem Abdullah Salem
Title :	Exploring the integration of multi criteria decision analysis in the clean energy biodiesels applications: A systematic review and gap analysis
Hits :	64

Place of Production :	Tanjung Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Komputeran & Meta-Teknologi
Year of Publication :	2024
Notes :	Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link :	Click to view web link
PDF Full Text :	You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Biodiesel has gained tremendous attention from researchers due to its environmentally friendly and renewable fuel manufactured domestically from vegetable oils or animal fats. Multiple factors, including emission and fuel efficiency, measure the performance of biodiesel. These characteristics make the process of evaluation and benchmarking a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This research attempts to survey the literature for multi-criteria decision-making applications on biodiesel. This systematic review was carried out on four scientific databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore, and WoS. The collected articles were summarized and mapped into a coherent taxonomy, while the main challenges, motivations, and recommendations were collected and categorized for better understanding and finding out essential characteristics. The final set of included articles was 33, and they were categorized into six different categories. Most articles (n=15/33) investigated the evaluation and selection of biodiesel alternatives using MCDM. Furthermore, a state-of-art bibliometric analysis is provided. The analysis demonstrates several challenges in this area, such as source selection, optimum fuel blending, and uncertainty. This article is expected to assist future researchers in addressing the current gaps and contribute to advancing this area. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd

References

A.O. Abdulrahman et al. (2018) The role of biomass as a cleaner energy source in Egypt's energy mix. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, pp. 3918-3930. Cited 50 times. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.049.

O. Albahri et al. (2023) Multi-perspective evaluation of integrated active cooling systems using fuzzy decision making model Energy Pol. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 37, art. no. 100627. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/sustainable-energy-technologies-and-assessments doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100627.

P. Alvira et al. (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review Bioresour. Technol. Bioresource Technology, 101 (13), pp. 4851-4861. Cited 3386 times.doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093.

A.M.P. Anahas et al. (2015) Isolation and screening of heterocystous cyanobacterial strains for biodiesel production by evaluating the fuel properties from fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles Bioresour. Technol. Bioresource Technology, 184, pp. 9-17. Cited 68 times. www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.003.

M. Anwar (2021) Biodiesel feedstocks selection strategies based on economic, technical, and sustainable aspects Fuel. Fuel, 283, art. no. 119204. Cited 98 times. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/fuel/ doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119204.

M. Aria et al. (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis Journal of informetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (4), pp. 959-975. Cited 8240 times. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-informetrics/ doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

K.B. Aviso et al. (2015) Risk assessment of the economic impacts of climate change on the implementation of mandatory biodiesel blending programs: a fuzzy inoperability input–output modeling (IIM) approach Biomass Bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 83, pp. 436-447. Cited 17 times. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/biomass-and-bioenergy/ doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.011.

R. Babazadeh et al. (2019) A benders-local branching algorithm for second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design under epistemic uncertainty Comput. Chem. Eng. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 124, pp. 364-380. Cited 40 times. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/computers-and-chemical-engineering doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.01.013

R. Babazadeh et al. (2016) Sustainable cultivation location optimization of the Jatropha curcas L. under uncertainty: a unified fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach Measurement. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 89, pp. 252-260. Cited 31 times. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.03.063

P. Baranitharan et al. (2019) Measurement of performance and emission distinctiveness of Aegle marmelos seed cake pyrolysis oil/diesel/TBHQ opus powered in a DI diesel engine using ANN and RSM Measurement. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 144, pp. 366-380. Cited 69 times. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.037.

P. Baranitharan et al. (2019) Multi-attribute decision-making approach for Aegle marmelos pyrolysis process using TOPSIS and Grey Relational Analysis: assessment of engine emissions through novel Infrared thermography. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, pp. 315-328. Cited 62 times. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-cleaner-production doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.188.

J. Bergmann et al. (2013) Biodiesel production in Brazil and alternative biomass feedstocks Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, pp. 411-420. Cited 192 times. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.058.

S. Bhowmik et al. (2020) Performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with diesel-kerosene-ethanol: a multi-objective optimization study Energy. Energy, 211, art. no. 118305. Cited 27 times. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118305.

N. Bordoloi et al. (2016) Characterization of bio-oil and its sub-fractions from pyrolysis of Scenedesmus dimorphus Renew. Energy. Renewable Energy, 98, pp. 245-253. Cited 119 times. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews/ doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.081.

C. Boutesteijn et al. (2017) The interaction between EU biofuel policy and first-and second-generation biodiesel production Ind. Crop. Prod. Industrial Crops and Products, 106, pp. 124-129. Cited 35 times. www.elsevier.com/inca/publications/store/5/2/2/8/2/5 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.067.

Ú. Cárdenas-Mamani et al. (2022) District-level analysis for household-related energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions: a case study in Lima, Peru Sustain. Cities Soc. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, art. no. 103572. Cited 34 times. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/724360/description#description doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103572.

A. Chanthawong et al. (2016) Stakeholders' perceptions on challenges and opportunities for biodiesel and bioethanol policy development in Thailand Energy Pol. Energy Policy, 91, pp. 189-206. Cited 55 times. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-policy/ doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.008.

D. Darshini et al. (2013) Capturing stakeholders views on oil palm-based biofuel and biomass utilisation in Malaysia Energy Pol. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1 (1), pp. 39-49. Cited 49 times.

L.M. de Souza et al. (2020) Oleaginous feedstocks for hydro-processed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) biojet production in southeastern Brazil: a multi-criteria decision analysis Renew. Energy Renewable Energy, 149, pp. 1339-1351. Cited 32 times. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews/ doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.125.

B. Debbarma et al. (2017) Exploration of PROMETHEE II and VIKOR methodology in a MCDM approach for ascertaining the optimal performance-emission trade-off vantage in a hydrogen-biohol dual fuel endeavour Fuel. Fuel, 210, pp. 922-935. Cited 39 times. http://www.journals.elsevier.com/fuel/ doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.016.

M. Deveci et al. (2022) Rough sets based Ordinal Priority Approach to evaluate sustainable development goals (SDGs) for sustainable mining Resour. Pol. Resources Policy, 79, art. no. 103049. Cited 53 times. www.elsevier.com/inca/publications/store/3/0/4/6/7/ doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103049.

A.R. Domingues et al. (2015) Applying multi-criteria decision analysis to the life-cycle assessment of vehicles J. Clean. Prod. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, pp. 749-759. Cited 65 times. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-cleaner-production doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.086.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page