UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| The aim of the paper is to review the trends in discussions related to the design process, design cognition, and design concepts. The method employed to identify these trends involved a thematic literature review of top journals in the Scopus database within the field of architecture and design cognition in 2023. After extensive filtering of journals and articles, the paper narrowed down its focus to one journal that met the criteria, namely Design Studies. Articles were limited to those dated from 2018 to 2023, resulting in a review of 34 articles. Three themes were identified in the articles reviewed, namely (i) Data-Informed Design Process; (ii) Sustainable, Inclusivity, and User Reflection; and (iii) Collaborative Ideation.
Keywords: Design process; Design cognitive; Design concept; Design Studies |
| References |
Baek, J. S., Kim, S., Pahk, Y., & Manzini, E. (2018). A sociotechnical framework for the design of collaborative services. Design Studies, 55, 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.01.001 Bianchin, M., & Heylighen, A. (2018). Just design. Design Studies, 54, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.001 Bresciani, S. (2019). Visual design thinking: A collaborative dimensions framework to profile visualisations. Design Studies, 63, 92–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.001 Chandrasegaran, S., Salah, A. A., & Lloyd, P. (2023). Constructing design activity in words: Exploring linguistic methods to analyse the design process. Design Studies, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101182 Comi, A., Jaradat, S., & Whyte, J. (2019). Constructing shared professional vision in design work: The role of visual objects and their material mediation. Design Studies, 64, 90–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.06.003 Daalhuizen, J., & Cash, P. (2021). Method content theory: Towards a new understanding of methods in design. Design Studies, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101018 Dyer, L., Power, J., Steen, A., Wallis, L., & Davison, A. (2021). Uncertainty and disciplinary difference: Mapping attitudes towards uncertainty across discipline boundaries. Design Studies, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101055 Goddard, Y. L., Ammirante, L., & Jin, N. (2023). A thematic review of current literature examining evidence-based practices and inclusion. Education Sciences, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010038 Gonçalves, M., & Cash, P. (2021). The life cycle of creative ideas: Towards a dual-process theory of ideation. Design Studies, 72, 100988. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100988 Hanrahan, B. V, Yuan, C. W., Rosson, M. B., Beck, J., & Carroll, J. M. (2019). Materializing interactions with paper prototyping: A case study of designing social, collaborative systems with older adults. Design Studies, 64, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.06.002 Kempenaar, A., & Van den Brink, A. (2018). Regional designing: A strategic design approach in landscape architecture. Design Studies, 54, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.006 Krishnakumar, S., Berdanier, C., Lauff, C., McComb, C., & Menold, J. (2022). The story novice designers tell: How rhetorical structures and prototyping shape communication with external audiences. Design Studies, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101133 Laing, S., & Apperley, M. (2020). The relevance of virtual reality to communication design. Design Studies, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100965 Lee, J. H., & Ostwald, M. J. (2022). The relationship between divergent thinking and ideation in the conceptual design process. Design Studies, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101089 Lloyd, P. (2019). You make it and you try it out: Seeds of design discipline futures. Design Studies, 65, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.008 Lloyd, P., & Oak, A. (2018). Cracking open co-creation: Categories, stories, and value tension in a collaborative design process. Design Studies, 57, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.003 Luck, R. (2018a). Inclusive design and making in practice: Bringing bodily experience into closer contact with making. Design Studies, 54, 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.11.003 Luck, R. (2018b). Participatory design in architectural practice: Changing practices in future making in uncertain times. Design Studies, 59, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.003 Lundmark, S. (2018). Design project failures: Outcomes and gains of participation in design. Design Studies, 59, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.07.002 Milovanovic, J., Hu, M., Shealy, T., & Gero, J. (2021). Characterization of concept generation for engineering design through temporal brain network analysis. Design Studies, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101044 Monache, S. D., Misdariis, N., & Özcan, E. (2022). Semantic models of sound-driven design: Designing with listening in mind. Design Studies, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101134 Nisha, B. (2022). Lost in imagined space: A psychoanalysis of participatory design. Design Studies, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101108 Oygür, I. (2018). The machineries of user knowledge production. Design Studies, 54, 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.002 Palmieri, T., Huybrechts, L., & Devisch, O. (2021). Co-producing, curating and reconfiguring dwelling patterns: A design anthropological approach for sustainable dwelling futures in residential suburbs. Design Studies, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101011 Stals, A., Jancart, S., & Elsen, C. (2021). Parametric modeling tools in small architectural offices: Towards an adapted design process model. Design Studies, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.100978 Tessier, V. (2022). Expansive learning for collaborative design. Design Studies, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101135 Töre Yargın, G., Moroşanu Firth, R., & Crilly, N. (2018). User requirements for analogical design support tools: Learning from practitioners of bio-inspired design. Design Studies, 58, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.11.006 Umney, D., & Lloyd, P. (2018). Designing frames: The use of precedents in parliamentary debate. Design Studies, 54, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.008 |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |