UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

Benefits and challenges of using panel discussion as a teaching strategy to teach MUET CEFR-aligned English speaking skills

AVAILABLE Thesis 359 Views
Back to search
Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files
Guest Preview PDF
Public preview document
Preview PDF
Full Text PDF
Complete document publication
View PDF File
General Information Cached
Title
Benefits and challenges of using panel discussion as a teaching strategy to teach MUET CEFR-aligned English speaking skills
Type
Thesis
Main Author
Premlathadevi Marimuthu
Subject
LB Theory and practice of education
Language Code
eng
Bibliographic Details
Place of Production
Tanjong Malim
Publisher
Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of publication
2024
Degree Type
Masters
Corporate Name
Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to investigate how panel discussion is used as a teaching strategy and to identify the benefits and challenges of using panel discussion as a teaching strategy by MUET teachers to teach MUET CEFR-aligned English speaking skills. The qualitative research design was selected to answer three research questions. The research employed three research instruments. The three research instruments are observation checklist, semi-structured interview and document analysis. Two MUET teachers were chosen by using purposive sampling. The research employed thematic and content data analysis investigating the teaching procedures and identifying the benefits and challenges of using panel discussion as a teaching strategy. The findings show three main themes and six sub-themes on how panel discussion was used as a teaching strategy. The three main themes are Pre-event Session, While-event Session and Post-event Session. The six sub-themes are Introduction to panel discussion, Selection of topics, Preparation, Presentation, Q&A session, and Closing remarks. The benefits indicated that panel discussions provide a comfortable learning environment and authentic learning environment for students. Panel discussions promote 21st century teaching and learning skills, enhances communication skills and creates contextualized learning environment. In addition, panel discussion is a holistic teaching strategy, and promotes independent learning. The challenges of using panel discussion as a teaching strategy are panel discussions can be time-consuming, the issue of spontaneity and success rate of panel discussion depends on students_ proficiency. The implication of this study suggested that panel discussion could be an alternative and effective teaching strategy._

References

Abdul Rahman, N.A.& Maarof, N. (2018). The effects of role-play and simulation approach on enhancing ESL oral communication skills. International journal of research in English education. (IJREE) 3.3 

Agarwal, M., Agarwal, S., & Parashar, Y. (2020). FAD (Formative Assessment using panel Discussion) -A useful tool for medical undergraduate students. Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 10(06). 

Anwar, K. (2016). Panel Discussion and the Development of Students' Self Confidence. English Language Teaching, 9(4), 224-229. 

Bans-Akutey, A. & Tiimub, B.M. (2001). Identifying Research Gaps in Schorlarly Work –A Review. Academia Letters, Article 3237. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3237 

Berk, L. & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood learning. Washington, D.C: National Association for Education of Young Children 

Blake, B & Pope, T. (2008). Journal of cross disciplinary perspective in education, Volume 1, no.1, p 59-67 

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597 

Brown University. Retrieved from brown.edu/sheridan/teaching-learning­resources/teaching-resources/classroom-practices-learning-contexts/ discussions/ checklist 

Brown, H.D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents 

Burns, A. & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research 

Chiau, L.G. (2019). Action research: The efficiency of adopting voice note recording for MUET speaking activity. Innovative teaching and learning journal, 3 (1), p 17-27 

Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage 

Cook, D.A. & Beckman, T.J. (2006). Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119, 166. 2006 

Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, Companion Volume with New Descriptors, Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe. cited in Malaysian Examinations Council, (2019). MUET regulations and test specification 

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and quantitative research. Pearson Education 

Creswell, J.W. (2016). 30 Essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage 

Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313-321 

Education First (EPI). (2019). EF English proficiency index: A ranking of 100 countries and regions by English skills. Malaysian journal of social sciences and humanities (MJSSH), Volume 6, issue 5, p 165-176. 2021  

Gusti, Pinatih. A.D.P. (2021). Improving Students’ Speaking Skill through Role-play Technique in 21st Century. Journal of Educational Study. Volume 1, Issue 1, 2021 

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson Education: Longman 

Hsieh, H.F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15 (9), 1277-1288 

Iraj, M & Mazyar, S. (2020). The Effect of Implementing Panel Discussion on Speaking Skill of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol.10, No. 4, pp. 445-452, April 2020     

Issac, J.C. (2010). Methods and strategies of teaching: an overview. Pondicherry University Press       

Kashinathan, S., & Aziz, A.A. (2021). ESL Learners’ Challenges in Speaking Malaysian Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2). p 888-991    

Khan, M.A., Aziz, A.A., & Yunus, M.M. (2021). Teachers’ role in teaching speaking against incongruencies between curriculum and curriculum implementation. Malaysian journal of social sciences and humanities (MJSSH), Volume 6, issue 5, 2021 

Kondracki, N.L., & Wellman, N.S. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviour, 34, 224-230 

Krishnan, S. & Abdullah, A. (2014). All for one: Using panel discussion to improve proficiency through group work. Social and behavioural science, Volume 123, p 225-231  

Kummin, S., Surat, S., Amir, R., Mohamad, M., & Yunus, M. M. (2020). The effects of meta-discussion strategies toward low english proficiency students in oral english performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 35(1), 75-91. 

Leh, S.K. & Melincavage, S.M. (2012). Panel discussion: creating a spirit of inquiry in the classroom. Journal of College Teaching & Learning –Second quarter, 2012, Volume 9. Number 2 

Leong, L. M. & Ahmadi, S.M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English speaking skills. International journal of research in English education. 2 (1), p 34-41 

Malaysian Examinations Council. (2019). Malaysian University English Test (MUET): regulations and test specifications. Selangor: Malaysian Examinations Council 

Mangaleswaran, S. & Aziz, A.A. (2019). The impact of the implementation of CLT on students' speaking skills. International journal of scientific and research publications (IJSRP), 9 (4)  

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (2), Retrieved March 10, 2005, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs­texte/2-00/02-00mayring-e.htm 

McLeod, S.A. (2019). What’s the Zoneof Proximal Development? Simply Psychology. Retrieved  from  www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal­Development.html  

Merriam-webster  Dictionary.  Skills.  Retrieved  from  https://www.merriam­webster.com/dictionary/skills 

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 

Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. 

Ministry of Education. (2015). English language education reform in Malaysia: The Roadmap 2015-2025 

Misbah, N.H., Mohamad, M., Yunus, M.M. & Yaacob, A. (2017). Identifying the factors contributing to students’ difficulties in the English language learning.Creative Education 

Mohajan, H. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: validity and relialibity. Annals of Spiru Haret University, 17 (3): p 58-82  

Morgan, D.L. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 112-121 (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 

Morse, J.M. & Field, P.A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals. 

Naaim, N. A. B., & Hashim, H. B. (2019). The importance of social learning strategies in enhancing students’ speaking skills in MUET. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 9(7), 68-81. 

Nawawi, N. M., Zuhaimi, N., Sabu, K., Mahamud, N. S. R., & Nasir, N. A. M. (2021). CEFR for languages and its effective implementation in secondary schools in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 63-72. 

Noble, N. & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research with examples. BMJ Journals, 22(3). Retrived Aug 22, 2020 from https://ebn.bmj.com/content/22/3/67     

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 

Radzi, H. A. B. M., Othman, A. B., & Radzi, A. H. B. M. (2020). Gallery walk activities in ESL classrooms. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1-17. 

Rao, P.S. (2019). The importance of speaking skills in English classroom. Alford Council of International English & Literature Journal (ACIELJ), Vol 2, issue 2, 2019, VS Publications 

Roslee, N. B., Hoon, T. A., Ishak, N. A. P. B. M., & Yeun, Y. C. F. (2019). Enhancing students’ speaking performance: Role of feedback and blended-learning. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 13(1), 144-152. 

Safitri, N.S. & Khoiriyah, I, (2017). Students’ perception on the use of English vlog (video blog) to enhance speaking skills. English Education Department. Universitas Islam Indonesia. Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 

Said, N. & Moi, K.S. (2020). Leveraging on ted talk videos in developing students’speaking Skills. 10th MELTA International Conference in English Language Education. Nov 2020 

Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press 

Samat, N. A. A., Muthu, S., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). DUBSLINGUISTIC enhancing English communication skills among Malaysian primary school pupils. Creative Education, 10(01), 48. 

Singh, C. K. S., Ramachandran, A., Singh, T. S. M., Tek, O. E., Yunus, M. M., & Mulyadi, D. (2020). The use of think pair share of cooperative learning to improveweakstudents’ speaking ability. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(05). 

Singh, C.K.S., Singh, T.S.M., Jaafar, H., Hoe, T.W., Subramaniam, G.I. & Abdullah,M.S.H.B. (2019). Developing a prototype speaking game for engineering students at polytechnic in Malaysia. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Special Issues on JCEES 2018, June 2019, p 9-17, School of Engineering, Taylor University 

Social Sciences Research Laboratories SSRL (2018, June 6) Using Triangulation to Improve Credibility and Validity (Video) 

St. Teressa of Avila. (2017). Retrieved from saintt.com/document/2017/9/ LessonPlanReflection Assessment.pdf 

Studlib. Instructor Observation Checklist. retrieved from studylib.net/ doc/7501547/ instructor- observation-checklist 

Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer 

Tuckett, A. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19, 75-87 

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development in higher psychological processes Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cited in McLeod, S.A. (2019). What’s The Zone of Proximal Development? Simply Psychology. Retrieved from www.Simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal­Development.html 

Werdiningsih, I. (2022). Panel discussion: skilled communication and knowledge construction to develop EFL learners’ speaking performance. Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember. 

Writing classroom observations English 4/6233: Composition Pedagogy. Retrieved from https://bullygoodteachers.wordpress.com/assignments/ 

Yukhymenko, M.A., Brown, S.W., Lawless, K.A., Brodowinska, K., & Mullin, G. (2014). Thematic analysis of teacher instructional practices and student responses in middle school classrooms with problem-based learning environment. Global Education Review, 1 (3), 93-109 

 

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.
Back to search
Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.