UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
![]() |
|
|
Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
Coaching is the term for team leadership in sports, and it is essential to achieving and maintaining high levels of athletic success and athlete satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to determine the athletes' preferences for their coaches' coaching leadership style as well as the athletes' satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between coaching leadership styles and athletes’ satisfaction in the University Sport Carnival. 164 athletes involved in the university sport carnival known as KARISMA 2022 from UiTM Perlis were selected to participate in this study. The questionnaires entitled Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS) and Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ) have been used for this study. The Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) version 27 software was used to analyze the data that had been collected. Descriptive statistic was used to identify the leadership styles preferred by the KARISMA 2022 athletes from UiTM Perlis. Meanwhile, Pearson's Correlation Coefficient was used to analyse the relationship between coach leadership styles and athlete satisfaction among the KARISMA 2022 athletes of UiTM Perlis. Based on the result, the KARISMA 2022 athletes from UiTM Perlis preferred the "positive feedback" leadership style with the highest mean score (M = 4.45)). The study findings showed a positive significant and moderate relationship between training and instruction (r = 0.657, p |
References |
Alfermann, D., Lee, M. J., & Wuerth, S. (2005). Perceived leadership behaviour and motivational climate as antecedents of adolescent athletes skill development. The Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(2), 14–36. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:35236869 Belleza, S. (2021). Coaching behavior as predictor of athlete satisfaction. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(15), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.a111 Chang, C.-M., Huang, H.-C., Huang, F.-M., & Hsieh, H.-H. (2019). A Multilevel Analysis of Coaches’ Paternalistic Leadership on Burnout in Taiwanese Athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126(2), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512518819937 Chelladurai, P., & Riemer, H. A. (1997). A classification of facets of athlete satisfaction. Journal of Sport Management, 11(2), 133–159. Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(1), 34–45. Horn, T. S. (1992). Leadership effectiveness in the sport domain. In Advances in sport psychology. (pp. 181–199). Human Kinetics Publishers. Ipinmoroti, O. A. (2002). Type of sport and gender as predictors of coach leadership behaviour patterns in Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of the International Council for Health Physical Education, Recreation Sport and Dance, 38, 31–35. Jacob, R. L. (2006). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and win-loss success in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I men and women’s basketball coaches. State University of New York. Kim, H.-D., & Cruz, A. B. (2016). The influence of coaches’ leadership styles on athletes’ satisfaction and team cohesion: A meta-analytic approach. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11(6), 900–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954116676117 Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (2002). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Routledge. Loughead, T. M., Hardy, J., & Eys, M. A. (2006). The nature of athlete leadership. Journal of Sport Behavior, 29(2), 142–158. Mashuri, S. N., Mokhtar, U. K. M., Rahman, M. W. A., & Bakri, N. H. S. (2022). Relationship between Coach Leadership Styles and Athletes’ Satisfaction at UITM Seremban. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(7), 1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i7/13905 McClain, N. M. (2005). Unique aspects of team cohesion with female athletes. Alliant international university, San Francisco Bay. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications. Ongalo, E. A., & Tari, J. (2015). Effect of employee motivation strategies on organizational performance: A Case of Electricity Generating and Distribution Firms in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 55–65. Peng, H. (1997). Comparison of preferred coaching leadership behaviors of basketball player sat the NCAA Division III level. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse. Pilus, A. H. M., & Saadan, R. (2009). Coaching leadership styles and athlete satisfactions among hockey team. Journal of Human Capital Development, 2(1), 77–87. Ramzaninezhad, R., & Keshtan, M. H. (2009). The relationship between coach’s leadership styles and team cohesion in Iran football clubs professional league. Brazilian Journal of Biomotricity, 3(2), 111–120. Rasyid, N. M., Aziz, S. A., & Tengah, R. Y. (2020). Goal orientation and preferred coaching styles of Malaysian Sport School’s athletes. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(2), 3938–3951. Schliesman, E. S. (1987). Relationship between the congruence of preferred and actual leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction with leadership. Journal of Sport Behavior, 10(3), 157. Sherman, C. A., Fuller, R., & Speed, H. D. (2000). Gender comparisons of preferred coaching behaviors in Australian sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23(4), 389. Smith, R. E., & Smoll, F. L. (1997). Coaching the coaches: Youth sports as a scientific and applied behavioral setting. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(1), 16–21. Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (2023). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Human kinetics. Wilson, M. (2007). Relation of present-day magmatism to global tectonic processes. In Igneous Petrogenesis (pp. 3–12). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9388-0_1
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |