Nosacq-50 penilaian iklim keselamatan dalam kalangan pekerja pengurusan dan barisan hadapan di pejabat kesihatan di Negeri Terengganu, Malaysia

Mohd Azwan bin Ali

Nosacq-50 penilaian iklim keselamatan dalam kalangan pekerja pengurusan dan barisan hadapan di pejabat kesihatan di Negeri Terengganu, Malaysia

AVAILABLE Article 434 Views

Back to search

Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files

General Information

Title

Nosacq-50 penilaian iklim keselamatan dalam kalangan pekerja pengurusan dan barisan hadapan di pejabat kesihatan di Negeri Terengganu, Malaysia

Type

Article

Main Author

Mohd Azwan bin Ali

Additional Authors

Zaman Awang Sulaiman
Mohd Roslan Rahmat
Intan Suraya Noor Arzahan

Subject

RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine

Language Code

zsm

Bibliographic Details

Place of Production

Tanjong Malim

Publisher

Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi

Year of publication

2024

Degree Type

Not related

Corporate Name

Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun

Abstract

Pelbagai aspek perlu diambil kira bagi memastikan tempat kerja mempunyai budaya keselamatan yang positif. Oleh itu, kajian ini mengkaji perbezaan iklim keselamatan dalam kalangan pekerja pengurusan dan barisan hadapan yang bekerja di Pejabat Kesihatan daerah (PKD) di Terengganu, Malaysia. Persekitaran kerja yang selamat akan mengelakkan kemalangan di tempat kerja serta meningkatkan budaya keselamatan di tempat kerja. Di Malaysia, masih berlaku kemalangan di tempat kerja yang menyebabkan kehilangan nyawa pekerja. Oleh itu, kita perlu mengkaji iklim keselamatan dan meningkatkan budaya keselamatan di tempat kerja di Malaysia. Kajian ini melibatkan dua Pejabat Kesihatan Daerah iaitu Pejabat Kesihatan Daerah Kuala Nerus dan Kuala Terengganu. Seramai 50 orang responden terdiri daripada kakitangan yang bertugas di Unit Vektor di setiap Pejabat Kesihatan Daerah terlibat. Setiap data responden diperoleh dengan menggunakan Borang Iklim Keselamatan NOSACQ-50 (Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire) telah diedarkan kepada responden untuk mendapatkan maklumat demografi dan menjawab soalan Iklim Keselamatan. Hasil daripada dapatan kajian, iklim keselamatan keseluruhan di kedua-dua PKD berada pada tahap yang agak rendah. Penilaian menunjukkan Dimensi 5 iaitu Keutamaan keselamatan dan risiko tidak diterima oleh pekerja berada pada tahap yang paling rendah (2.15) dan memerlukan peningkatan yang besar untuk pembaikan. Manakala bagi lima dimensi yang lain iaitu Dimensi 1, 2, 3, 4, dan 7 (Keutamaan komitmen dan kecekapan keselamatan pengurusan, Pemerkasaan aspek keselamatan oleh pihak pengurusan, Keselamatan pengurusan keadilan, Komitmen keselamatan pekerja dan Kepercayaan pekerja terhadap keberkesanan sistem keselamatan) berada pada tahap yang agak rendah dan memerlukan peningkatan penambahbaikan tertentu. Akhir sekali, Dimensi 6 iaitu komunikasi, pembelajaran dan kepercayaan terhadap kompetensi rakan sekerja berada pada tahap yang agak baik. Oleh itu, pihak pengurusan perlu meningkatkan lagi kualiti pengurusan keselamatan pekerjaan supaya iklim keselamatan berada pada tahap yang optimum dan menjamin budaya keselamatan yang positif terutamanya di fasiliti kesihatan umumnya. Keywords: Budaya keselamatan, Iklim keselamatan, Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire, pengurusan

References

Amirah, N. A., Amin, A., Muda, S., Talaat, W. I. W., & Rashid, N. M. N. N. M. (2017). Relationship Between Behavioral Aspects and Safety Culture in the Peninsular Malaysia Manufacturing Industry. World Applied Sciences Journal, 35(9), 1880–1884. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2017.1880.1884

Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x

Cooper Ph.D., M. D. (2002). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00035-7

F.W. Guldenmund. (2000). The nature of safety culture : a review of theory and research. Safety Science, 34, 215–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X

Flin, R., Mearns, K., Connor, P. O., & Bryden, R. (2000). Measuring safety climate : identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34(July 1998).

Glendon, A. I., & Litherland, D. K. (2001). Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behaviour in road. Safety Science, 39(3).

Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347

Juhari, M. L., & Arifin, K. (2020). Pembentukan model faktor bahan dan peralatan sebagai penyebab kemalangan dalam industri pembinaan Mass Rapid Transit. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 16(2), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2020-1602-10

Kines, P., Lappalainen, J., Mikkelsen, K. L., Olsen, E., Pousette, A., Tharaldsen, J., Tómasson, K., & Törner, M. (2011). Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(6), 634–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.004

Molenaar, K. R., Park, J. Il, & Washington, S. (2009). Framework for measuring corporate safety culture and its impact on construction safety performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:6(488)

Neal, A., & Griffin, M. (2004). Safety climate and safety at work. In: Barling, J., Frone, M. R. (Eds.), The Psychology of Workplace Safety. Psychological Association, United States.

Noor Arzahan, I. S., Ismail, Z., & Yasin, S. M. (2022a). Safety culture, safety climate, and safety performance in healthcare facilities: A systematic review. Safety Science, 147, 105624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105624

Noor Arzahan, I. S., Ismail, Z., & Yasin, S. M. (2022b). Safety Performance Model in Malaysian Paramedic Training Institute in Malaysia. Injury Prevention, 28(Suppl 2). https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2022-safety2022.41

Rahman, F. A., Arifin, K., Abas, A., Mahfudz, M., Basir Cyio, M., Khairil, M., Ali, M. N., Lampe, I., & Samad, M. A. (2022). Sustainable Safety Management: A Safety Competencies Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 14(11), 6885. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116885

Siti Fatimah Bahari. (2011). An Investigation of Safety Training , Safety Climate and Safety Outcomes : A Longitudinal Study in a Malaysian Manufacturing Plant.

Srinivasan, S. (2012). the Impact of 5S on the Safety Climate of Manufacturing Workers. Manufacturing System, 1(December), 1–58.

Wachter, J. K., & Yorio, P. L. (2014). A system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents: An empirical and theoretical investigation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 68, 117–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.029

Wu, T.-C., Chen, C.-H., & Li, C.-C. (2008). A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.11.001

Yu-Jung, L., Jin-Luh, C., Shyh-Yueh, C., Ming-Tsai, H., & Chen-Hua, W. (2013). Evaluation of Safety Performance in Process Industries. Process Safety Progress, 25(4), 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs

Yule, S., Flin, R., & Murdy, A. (2007). The role of management and safety climate in preventing risk-taking at work. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 7(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011727

Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96