UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| ABSTRACT Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) is an important agenda in schools towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to achieve UNESCO's 2030 Agenda. Both conceptual frameworks, ESD-SDGs are implemented in pedagogic activities and important to the achievement of the SDGs. The purpose of this study is to measure ESD-SDG concept in teaching, among Geography teachers. A quantitative study was conducted involving 252 samples from 350 Geography teachers in Penang through a survey method. The findings based on mean score showed as “often”carried out by Geography teachers in term of “experiential-learning (active) approach” (M=3.95, SD=0.809), “real-world learning approach” (M=3.40, SD=1.065) and “critical-problem solving learning approach” (M=3.53, SD=1.011). Geography teachers implemented the “experiential-learning (active) approach” in teaching by “Emphasis on sustainable living”, “Cultivate the value of appreciating all life and nature” and “Spread the ideals of harmony, peace, and respect for one another". Furthermore, teachers choose “sometime” in implementing the global citizenship project based on the “Real-world learning approach”. As a worldwide need to teach and promote students about sustainable development (SD) in line with SDG4.7, the findings of the study show that the pedagogical approach to sustainable development towards the implementation of the ESD-SDGs concept is insufficient and needs to be improved especially students-centered learning (SCL) in the teaching approach.
Keywords: Education for Sustainable Development, Pedagogy for Sustainable Development, Sustainable Development Goals, Student-Centered Learning (SCL) |
| References |
Amin Al-Haadi. S., Zuria, M., Salleh, A., Amla, S., Kamaruzaman, J., & Mizan Adiliah, A.I. (2011). Reliability Andvalidity of Peer Aggression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale. World Applied Sciences Journal, 34, 1685-1691 Aye, S., Win, Y. M. & Maw, S. S. (2019). In-Service Teachers’ Perception towards Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in Myanmar. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1280(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032043 Brundiers K, Wiek A. (2011). Educating students in real- world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innov High Educ, 36(2), 107–124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9161-9 Cotton, D.R. 2006. Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educ. Res. 48, 223–241. https://doi.org/0.1080/00131880600732306 Grabovska, R., & Grabowski, J. (2009). Implementing the United Nations decade on education for sustainable development in latvian higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 11(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/ 10.2478/v10099-009-0029-y Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Öhman, M. C., Shyamsundar, P., ... & Noble, I. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495(7441), 305-307. Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev. 16(3), 235–266. Mohd Zaki, S., & Mohammad Zohir, S. (2021). Geography Teachers’ Knowledge of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Journal of Contemporary Social Science and Education Studies (JOCSSES), 1(2), 129-139. Nguyen, T. P., Leder, S., & Schruefer, G. (2021). Recontextualising education for sustainable development in pedagogic practice in Vietnam: Linking Bernsteinian and constructivist perspectives. Environmental Education Research, 27(3), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1879732 Oulton, C.; Day, V.; Dillon, J.; Grace, M. 2004. Controversial issues-teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 30, 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973 Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). Earth ’ s Future A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal ( SDG ) Interactions Earth ’s Future. Interactions, Earth’s Future, 5, 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632 Redman, E. (2013). Advancing educational pedagogy for sustainability: developing and implementing programs to transform behaviors. Int J Environ Sci Educ, 8(1), 1–34. Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206–2211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0 Scott, W.; Gough, S. 2003. Oral Evidence to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee’s Enquiry into Sustainable Development; University of Bath: Bath, UK https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464625 Segalàs, J., Ferrer-Balas, D., & Mulder, K.F. (2010). What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach. J Clean Prod 18(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.012 Schee, J. V. D. (2016). Sustainability and Geography Education. Jornal of Research and Didactics in Geography (J-READIN), (11-18). Stibbe, A. (2007). Words and worlds: New directions for sustainability literacy. Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problems, promises and good practice, 5, 283. Taimur, S. (2020). Pedagogical training for sustainability education. Quality Education, 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69902-8_51-1 UNESCO. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development: Agenda 21. UNESCO: Switzerland. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21.htm. UNESCO. (1992). Education for Sustainable Development Lens: A Policy and Practice Review Tool. UNESCO: Switzerland. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=922&menu=35 UNESCO. (2005). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development ( Education for Sustainable Development Lens: A Policy and Practice Review Tool www.unesco.org/education/desd UNESCO. (2015). Global Citizenship Education: Topics and learning objectives. http:// unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002329/232993e.pdf UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives; UNESCO: Paris, France. In International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 2(1). Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an Instrument for Measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of caring sciences, 4(2), 165. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |