AACTE Committee Innovation and Technology (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educator.  New York: Routledge. 

Abd Fattah,  T., Yahya, F. H., Siraj, S., Kurniawan, H., & Mat Zain, R. (2021). Need Analysis for Development of Pedagogical Model Integration of Visualization Technology to Enhance Performance in Geometry. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(2), 110–121. 

Abdul Halim Abdullah & Effandi Zakaria. (2013).   The Effects of Van Hiele‘s Phases of Learning Geometry on Students' Degree of Acquisition of Van Hiele Levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(IFEE 2012), 251–266.  

Abdul Halim Abdullah, Hayati Nazirwan, Kumaresan Pumalai & Nor’ Hidayah Mohd. Amir, (2020). Pentaksiran PISA: Di Mana Kedudukan Malaysia Untuk Literasi Matematik Dalam Kalangan Negara Asia Tenggara?. UTM.  https://www.majalahsains.com/pentaksiran-pisa-di-mana-kedudukan-malaysia-untuk-literasi-matematik-dalam-kalangan-negara-asia-tenggara/ 

Abdul Hanid, M., Mohamad Said, M., Yahaya, N. et al. (2022). Effects of augmented reality application integration with computational thinking in geometry topics. Educ Inf Technol, 27, 9485–9521. 

Abdul Muqsith Ahmad (2018). Pembangunan model ENi berasaskan aktiviti inkuiri bagi program latihan kemahiran kejuruteraan institut latihan kemahiran malaysia. Unpublished Theses: UM. 

Abdul Razaq Ahmad, Mohd Mahzan Awang & Jamil Ahmad (2017). Aspirasi Terhadap Kepimpinan Politik Negara. Malaysian Journal of Youth Studies, 16,19-47. 

Abdullah, A. & Zakaria, E. (2013). The effects of van hiele's phases of learning geometry on students’ degree of acquisition of van hiele levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 251-266. 

Abdullah, A.H. (2013). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan fasa-fasa pembelajaran geometri van hiele dengan strategi pembelajaran pembentukan konjektur dalam persekitaran perisian Geometer’s SketchPad. Unpublished Theses: UKM. 

Adler, M., & Ziglio, E (1996). Gazing Into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its application to social policy and public health. London Jessica Kingsley Publisher. 

Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 

Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D. & Vines, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2):217-235. 

Anderson-Inman, L. & Ditson, L. (1999). Computer-based concept mapping: a tool for negotiating meaning. Learning & Leading Technology, 26, 6-13. 

Anis Syuhada Shaharom & Mohd Hishamuddin Abdul Rahman (2021). Keberkesanan Aplikasi Mudah Alih ‘Algoritma bersama Algo’ bagi Pembelajaran Topik Algoritma dalam Subjek Asas Sains Komputer. Journal of Engineering, Technology & Applied Science, 3(2), 66-81. 

Anne, M. H. (1999). Young Children‘s Developing Understanding of Geometric Shapes. Teaching Children Mathematics 5: 353-570. 

Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 215-241. 

Arifanti, D. R. (2020). Mathematical reasoning in problem-solving in three dimensions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1). 

Armah, R. B., and Kissi, P. S. (2019). Use of the van Hiele Theory in Investigating Teaching Strategies used by College of Education Geometry Tutors. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(4). 

Arufe-Giráldez, V., Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, A., Ramos-Álvarez, O., & Navarro-Patón, R. (2023). News of the pedagogical models in physical Education—A quick review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2586.  

Atnafu, M., & Zergaw, D. (2020). Availability of resources, mathematics teachers' knowledge, and attitude towards mathematics visualization as predictors of the development of students' visualization in mathematics. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 14(2), 382-416. 

Baartmans, Beverly, Gimmestad and Sheryl Sorby. (1996). Making Connections: Spatial  Skills  and  Engineering  Drawings.  The  Mathematics  Teacher  89 (April 1996): 348-353. 

Basaran, M., Özalp, G., Kalender, I., and Alacaci, C. (2015). Mathematical knowledge and skills expected by higher education in engineering and the social sciences: Implications for high school mathematics curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 405–420. 

Berliner, D. C. (2004). Expert teachers: Their characteristics, development and accomplishments. In R. Batllori i Obiols, A. E Gomez Martinez, M. Oller i Freixa & J. Pages i. Blanch (eds.), De la teoria….a l’aula: Formacio del professorat ensenyament de las ciències socials (pp. 13-28). Barcelona, Spain: Departament de Didàctica de la Llengua de la Literatura I de les Ciències Socials, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. 

Bidaibekov, Y., Grinshkun, V., Bostanov, B., Umbetbayev, K., Myrsydykov, Y.(2020). Al-Farabi's mathematical legacy and algorithmic approach to resolving problems regarding geometrical constructions in geogebra environment. Periodico Tche Quimica,17(34), 599-620. 

Billings, D.M., Kowalski, K. and Smith, C.M. (2013). The flipped classroom for professional development: Part II. Making podcasts and videos. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(11), 486-487. 

Boaler, J. (2000). Exploring situated insights into research and learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 113-119. 

Boferding, L &  Aqazade, M. (2022). “Where does the square go?”: reinterpreting shapes when solving a tangram puzzle. Educational Studies in Mathematics 112, 25–47. 

Carroll, L. S. L. (2017). A comprehensive definition of technology from an ethological perspective. Soc. Sci. 6 (126): 1-20. 

Chambers, P. (2008). Teaching mathematics. London: Sage Press. 

Chang,  K. E.,  Sung, Y. T.,  &  Lin,  S. Y.  (2007). Developing geometry thinking through multimedia learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5). 

Chew, C. M., & Lim, C. S. (2013). Enhancing primary pupils‘ Geometric thinking through  phase-based  instruction  using  the  Geometer’s  SketchPad.  Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 28, 33-51. 

Chua Yan Piaw. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Asas Statistik penyelidikan buku 2. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill. 

Cifuentes, L. & Hsieh, Y.J. (2003). Visualization for construction of meaning during study time: a quantitative analysis. Int. J. Instruct. Media, 30(3), 263–273. 

Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In: D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan. 

Clements, D., Battista, M. (1990). The effects of Logo on children's conceptualizations   of   angle   and   polygons.   Journal   for   Research   in Mathematics Education, 21, 356-371. 

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE. 

Crompton, H., Grant, M. R., & Shraim, K. Y. H. (2018). Technologies to enhance and extend children’s understanding of geometry: a configurative thematic synthesis of the literature. Educational Technology & Society, 21 (1), 59–69. 

Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Learning and teaching geometry, K-12, 1-16. 

Dick, W, Carey, L & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Jil. 6. New York: Pearson. 

Disbudak, O. & Akyuz, D. (2019). The comparative effects of concrete manipulatives and dynamic software on the geometry achievement of fifth-grade students. International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 26 (1), 3-21. 

Drijvers, P. (2012). Teachers transforming resources into orchestrations. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to “lived” resources: mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 265–281). New York: Springer. 

Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M. A., Ainley, J., Andresen, M., Chan, Y. C., Dana-Picard, T., Gueudet, G., Kidron, I., Leung, A., & Meagher, M. (2010b). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: Rethinking the terrain. 13 (pp. 89–132). Lisbon: Springer Science + Business Media. 

Driscoll, M.P. (2002). Psychological foundations of instructional design. Dlm Reiser, R. A.& Dempsey, J. V. 2002.  Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, pp 57-69. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. 

Fitriyani H and Khasanah U 2017 Student’s rigorous mathematical thinking based on cognitive style Journal of Physics: Conference Series 943 p.012055 

Fogarty, R. (2002). How to integrate the curricula. (2nd Eds). USA : Pearson. 

Fraenkel, J.R. and Wallen, N.E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education.(2nd. Eds). New York: McGraw Hill. 

Fraser, V., & Garofalo, J. (2015). Novice mathematics teachers’ use of technology to enhance student engagement, questioning, generalization, and conceptual understanding. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 29–51. 

Gagn., R. M ,Wager, W.W, Colas, K. C. & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of  instructional design. 5th Eds. New York: Thomson Wadsworth. 

Gani, M. F. R. (2018). Keberkesanan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi pelajar dalam matematik melalui kaedah pembelajaran luar bilik darjah. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 10(1), 80-90. 

Gardner, R. B., & Kamran, N. (1993). Characteristics and the geometry of hyperbolic equations in the plane. Journal of Differential Equations, 104(1), 60-116. 

Goos, M., Soury-Lavergne, S., Assude, T., Brown, J., Kong, C. M., Glover, D., Grugeon, B., Laborde, C., Lavicza, Z., Miller, D., & Sinclair, M. (2010). Teachers and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Digital technologies and mathematics teaching and learning: Rethinking the terrain (Mathematics education and technology— rethinking the terrain: new ICMI 

study series) (Vol. 13, pp. 311–328). Lisbon: Springer Science and Business Media. 

Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2017), 105–123.  

Gün, E. T., and Atasoy, B. (2017). The effects of augmented reality on elementary school students’ spatial ability and academic achievement. Egitim Ve Bilim, 42(191), 31-51. 

Gürbüz, M. C.; Agsu, M. & Güler, H. K. (2018). Investigating Geometric Habits of Mind by Using Paper Folding. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(3-4), 157-174. 

Gurevich, I., & Gorev, D. (2012). Examining the impact of an integrative method of using technology on students’ achievement, efficiency of computer usage and pedagogic procedure in geometry. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 19(3), 95–104. 

Hair, J.F., Babin, B., Money, A.H., & Samouel, P. (2003). Essentials of Business Research Method. USA: John Wiley & Sons. 

Halimah Badioze Zaman (1996). Malaysian perspective on literacy and biliteracy research. Proceedings of the International Development in Asia Committee Reading Research Conference, pp. 12-23. 

Hanafi, H. F., Said, C. S., Wahab, M. H., and Samsuddin, K. (2017). Improving students’ motivation in learning ICT course with the use of a mobile augmented reality learning environment. Bristol, United Kingdom: IOP Publishing. 

Harsalinda,  R.  (2018).  Visualisasi  Sebagai  Upaya  untuk  Memahami  Materi  Teoritis  di  Dalam  Perkuliahan. Journal Deutsch als Fremdsprache in Indonesian, 2(1), 1-14. 

Hartono, S. (2020). Effectiveness of Geometer's Sketchpad Learning in Two Dimensional Shapes. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(3), 84-93. 

Hassan, M.N., Abdullah, A.H. & Ismail, N. (2023). Rethinking strategy on developing students’ levels of geometric thinking in Sokoto state, Nigeria. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education,12(1), 444-450. 

Healy, L., & de Carvalho, C. C. S. (2014). Evidence-based, theoretically informed design as a means to investigate and transform proof practices in school mathematics. Teaching mathematics and its Applications, 33(3), 150–165. 

Hsieh, Y.C.J. & Cifuentes, L. (2003). The Effect of the Use of Student-Generated Visualization as a Study Strategy for Middle School Science Concept Learning. In C. Crawford, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2003--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education 

International Conference (pp. 2998-3005). Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).  

Huang, Y., J.E. Hickman, and S. Wu, 2018: Impacts of enhanced fertilizer applications on tropospheric ozone and crop damage over sub-Saharan Africa. Atmos.Environ., 180,117-125. 

Hunt, S.D., Sparkman, R. D., & Wilcox, J. B (1982). The pretest in survey research: Issues and preliminary findings. Journal of Marketing Research 19, 269-273. 

Hylad, K. (2005). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Idris, H., Md Nor, M., & Abdul Rahman, M. N. (2022). Sustainability of Quality Education: Development of a Pattern Learning Module for Early Mathematics Based on Flipped Classroom with Augmented Reality. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak Kebangsaan, 11(1), 80-90. 

Irsal, I.L., Jupri, A, & Prabawanto, S. (2017). Junior high school students’ understanding and problem solving skills on the topics of line and angles. Journal of Physics, 895 1 1-7. 

Isaac S. & Michael, W.B. (1984). Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego: San Deigo Publishers. 

Iuliana, M. (2012). Preservice primary school teachers’ elementary geometry knowledge, Acta Didactica Nipocentisa 5 (2), 33-40. 

Jamalludin Harun (2004). Pembinaan dan penilaian keberkesanan sistem pembelajaran berasaskan masalah menerusi web bagi program perguruan. Tesis Dr. Falsafah. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 

Jonassen, D.H.(1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Dlm. Reigeluth, C. M. (pnyt.) Instructional design theories & models. a new paradigm of instructional theory,  pp. 215 -239. New Jersey: LEA Publisher. 

Jones, H., & Twiss, B. L (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. New York: Macmillan. 

Jonsson,U., Eek, M.N., Sunnerhagen, K.S., Himmelmann, K. (2019).  Cerebral palsy prevalence, subtypes, and associated impairments: a population-based comparison study of adults and children, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 61, 10, 1162-1167. 

Joshi, D. R. (2017). Influence of ICT in mathematics teaching. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(1), 7–11. 

Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (1986). Models of teaching, 499. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 

Juariah, J., Syaf, A. H., Rohimah, I., Sugilar, H., & Kariadinata, R. (2018). MathDroid application development on three-dimensional geometry materials. IOP Conference Series.Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1). 

Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1998). Fuzzy Mathematical Model in Engineering and Management Science. New York: Elseivier Science Inc. 

Kaware, S. S., & Sain, S. K. (2015). ICT application in education: an overview. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 2, 25-32. 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (PPPM) 2013 – 2025. Putrajaya: Pengarang. 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah. Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 1 hingga Tingkatan 5. Putrajaya: Pengarang. 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah. Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 1 hingga Tingkatan 5. Putrajaya: Pengarang. 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Pencapaian Malaysia dalam PISA 2018. Putrajaya : Pengarang. 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020). Laporan kebangsaan TIMSS 2019, Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Putrajaya : Pengarang. 

Kieran, C., & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Research on the role of technological environments in algebra learning and teaching. In The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra The 12thICMI Study (pp. 97–152). Springer, Dordrecht 

Kim, J. (2020). Learning and Teaching Online During Covid-19: Experiences of Student Teachers in an Early Childhood Education Practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(2), 145–158.  

Konyalioglu, A. C., Aksu, Z., & Senel, E. Ö. (2012). The preference of visualization in teaching    and    learning    absolute    value. International    Journal    of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 613-626. 

Kurniasih, A. W., Wiyanti, D. T., & Zahid, M. Z. (2018, February). Visualisasi konsep matematika dalam pembelajaran menggunakan geogebra. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 796-799. 

Kwon, H. (2017). Effects of 3D printing and design software on students' overall performance. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(4), 37-42.  

Lala, G. (2014). The emergence and development of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Marketing from information to decision, (7), 149-160. 

Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of  Management Journal, 53(6), 1305-1335. 

Makki, M.H.,Khalick, Abd-El-F. & Bou Joude, S. (2003). Lebanese secondary school student environmental knowledge and attitude. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 21-23. 

Manual Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Rumah Versi 2. (2021). https://www.moe.gov.my/pekeliling/4081-manual-pengajaran-dan-pembelajaran-versi-2-2-feb-2021-1/file 

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 

Mason, J., Graham, A. & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2005). Developing Thinking in Algelbra. Illustrated 

Mayer, R.H.(1999). Designing instruction for constructive learning. Dlm. Reigeluth, C. M. (pnyt.) Instructional design theories & models. a new paradigm of instructional theory, pp. 141 -160. New Jersey: LEA Publisher. 

McGee, M. G.(1979). Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormon and neurological influences.Psychological Bulletin,  86(5), 889-918. 

McKillip, J. (1987). Need Analysis: tools for the human services and education. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 

McKim, R. H. (1980). Experiences in Visual Thinking (2 ed.). Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole. 

Meng, C. C., & Idris, N. (2012). Enhancing students' geometric thinking and achievement in solid geometry. Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 15-25. 

Michelsen, C. (2006): Functions: a modelling tool in mathematics and science. Z. Didaktik Mathematik (ZDM), 38, 269-280 

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054. 

Mohd Khairul Nuzul Hassan (2020). Reka bentuk dan pembangunan model pengajaran “e-TVET” bagi program mekanikal dan pembuatan di kolej vokasional zon utara. Unpublished Theses: UM. 

Mohd Norakmar Omar et al. (2020). Karakter kepimpinan teknologi pengetua dalam pengintegrasian ict di sekolah menengah. Jurnal kepimpinan pendidikan, 7(1) . 

Mohd Paris Saleh (2016). Model pengajaran m-pembelajaran berasaskan kaedah inkuiri mata pelajaran sejarah peringkat menengah. Unpublished Theses: UM. 

Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, Saedah Siraj, Zaharah Hussin, Nurulrabihah & Ahmad Arifin Sapar. (2014). Pengenalan asas kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam penyelidikan reka bentuk dan pemabangunan. Bangi: Minda Intelek. 

Mohd Safarin Nordin. Kesan penggunaan pemodelan bongkah 3-dimensi dalam pengajaran ke atas kemahiran visualisasi pelajar aliran teknikal sekolah menengah teknik. (2009).Thesis PhD UTM: Unpublished. 

Mohd Salleh. A, & Zaid Zainal.  (2013). Improving the levels of geometric thinking of secondary school students using geometry learning video based on Van Hiele theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 2(1), 16-22. 

Mohd Salleh. A, Mohamed  Bilal, A., & Tong, T. (2012). Assisting Primary School Children to Progress through Their van Hiele ‘ s Levels of Geometry Thinking Using Google SketchUp. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 75–87. 

Muhammad Nidzam Yaakob (2017). Pembangunan model kurikulum m-pembelajaran kursus teknologi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran di institut pendidikan guru. Unpublished Theses: UM. 

Nadarajan K., Abdullah, A. H., Ahmad Alhassora, N.S., Ibrahim, N.S., Surif, J.,  Ali, D. F., Mohd Zaid, N. Z. &  Hamzah, M. H. (2023). The Effectiveness of a Technology-Based Isometrical Transformation Flipped Classroom Learning Strategy in Improving Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. IEEE Access, 11, 4155-4172. 

Najihah Mustaffa (2017). Integrating algebric thinking in problem-based learning amng secondary school students. Unpublished Theses: UTM. 

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrived from https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/ 

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM 

Newby, J.T, Stepich, D.A., Lehman, J.D. & Russell, J.D.(2006). Educational technology for teaching and learning, Ed. ke-3. New Jersey : Pearson Education, Inc. 

Ng, OL., Shi, L. & Ting, F. Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: dynamic geometry and 3D printing. IJ STEM Ed 7, 50 (2020). 

Ngirishi, H. & Bansilal, S. (2019). An exploration of high school learners’ understanding of Geometric concepts. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(1), 82-98. 

Nilson, L.B. & Goodson, L.A. (2021). Online teaching as its best: merging instructional design with tecahing and learning research. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Josey-Bass. 

Noraini Idris, & Tay, B. L. (2004). Teaching and Learning of Geometry: Problem and Prospects. Masalah Pendidikan, 27, 165-178. 

Noraini Idris. (2005). Pedagogy in Mathematics Education. Second Edition. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication Sdn. Bhd. 

Noraini Idris. (2009). The impact of using geometers' sketchpad on malaysian students' achievement and van hiele geometric thinking. journal of mathematics education, 2 (2), 94 -107 . 

Novita, R., Putra, M., Rosayanti, E. & Fitriati, F. (2018). Design learning in mathematics education: Engaging early childhood students in geometrical activities to enhance geometry and spatial reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1088 (2018) 012016. 

Nuggent,G.,Soh,L.,&Samal,A.(2006). Design,development,and validation of learning objects. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(3), 271–281. 

Nunnally, J. C. & I. H. Bernstein. (1994). Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 

Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psyochometric theory (2nd. Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York. 

Nurwijayanti A., Budiyono & Fitriana, L. (2018). The geometry ability of junior high school students in karanganyar based on the hoffer’s theory. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 983, 012085. 

Onyancha, R., and Kinsey, B. (2007). The effect of engineering major on spatial ability improvements over the course of undergraduate studies. In 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports (pp. T1H-20). IEEE. 

Ozdemir, G. (2010). Exploring visuospatial thinking in learning about mineralogy:spatial orientation ability and spatial visualization ability. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 737–759. 

Padilla, L. M. , Creem-Regehr, S.H., Hegarty, M. &  Stefanucci. J. K. (2018). Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(29), 1-25. 

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS Program (6th ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education. 

Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L.M. Given (Ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2.Sage: Los Angeles, pp. 697-8. 

Pangestu, A. & Setyaningrum, W. (2020). Instructional media for space geometry based on augmented reality to improve students' spatial reasoning, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. (1581), 1-6. 

Patahuddin, S.M., Lowrie, T. & Dalgarno, B. (2016). Analysing Mathematics Teachers’ TPACK Through Observation of Practice. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 25(5–6):863–872.  

Perrotta, C. (2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? A critical analysis of teachers’ perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314–327. 

Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers’ intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299–317. 

Pisapa, J.(1994). In Williams, D.M. (2000). Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning. Singapore: Prentice Hall. 

Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C. E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow's teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 863–870.  

Rahayu, S. & Jupri, A. (2021). Geometrical thinking of junior high school students on the topic of lines and angles according to van hiele theory. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE) 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1806, 012089. 

Ramlah Mustapha (2017). Reka bentuk model integriti akademik berasaskan penghayatan rohani. Unpublished Theses: UM. 

Ramlie, M. K., Tahir, H. M., & Shuib, A. S. M. (2018). Kepentingan imaginasi dan persepsi dalam merekabentuk imej 3D. Idealogy Journal, 3(2), 215-222. 

Raphael, D. & Wahlstrom, M. (1989). The influence of instructional aids on mathematics achievement. J. Res. Math. Educ., 20(2), 173-190. 

Razak, N. A., Jalil, H. A., & Ismail, I. A. (2019). Challenges in ict integration among malaysian public primary education teachers: the roles of leaders and stakeholders. International of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(24), 184–205.  

Reid,  M.,  &  Reid,  S.  (2017).  Learning  to  be  a  math  teacher:  What  knowledge  is  essential? International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(4), 851–872. 

Riastuti, N., Mardiyana & Pramudya, I. (2017). Analysis of student’s geometry skills viewed from spatial intelligence. AIP Conference Proceedings 1913, 020024 (2017), 1-5. 

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research: Methods,Strategies and Issues. London: Erlbaum. 

Rio Sumarni Shariffudin (2007). Innovative design of instructional materials for teaching and learning purpose using technology. Simposium Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran UTM 2007 (SPPUTM 07). November 2007.  

Robert Scott Liggett. (2017). the impact of use of manipulatives on the math scores of grade 2 student. Brock Education Journal, 26(2). 

Ross, Elinor P. (1998). Pathways to thinking: Strategies for developing independent learners k-8. Norwood: Christoper-Gordon Publishers, Inc. 

Ruthven, K. (2018). Instructional activity and student interaction with digital resources. In Research on Mathematics Textbooks and Teachers’ Resources (pp. 261–275). Springer, Cham 

Ruthven, K., & Lavicza, Z. (2011). Didactical conceptualization of dynamic mathematical approaches: Example analysis from the InnoMathEd program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 89–110. 

Saedah Siraj, Muhammad Ridhuan Tony Lim Abdullah & Rozaini Muhamad Rozkee (2020). Pendekatan penyelidikan rekabentuk dan pembangunan: aplikasi kepada penyelidikan pendidikan. Tanjong Maliam: Penerbit UPSI. 

Saedah Siraj. (2004). M-pembelajaran untuk kuriklum masa depan. Masalah Pendidikan, 27, 115-129. 

Salleh, F., & Md Salleh, S. (2021). Pembangunan Aplikasi Pembelajaran 3D Maths Untuk Topik Bentuk Geometri 3 Dimensi Berasaskan Android (Development of 3D Maths Learning Application for Android-Based 3-Dimensional Geometry Topics). Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 3(2). 

Sarkar, P., Kadam, K. & Pillai, J.S. (2020). Learners' approaches, motivation and patterns of problem-solving on lines and angles in geometry using augmented reality. Smart Learning Environments, 7(17), 1-23.  

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of'well-taught'mathematics   courses. Educational   psychologist, 23(2),   145-166. 

Selkirk, K. (2019). Seeing and Believing: Examining The Role Of Visualization Technology In Decision-Making About The Future. Dissertation for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy. Arizona State University. 

Sharifah Alwiah Al Sagoff. (1983). Ilmu pendidikan pedagogi. Kuala lumpur,  

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. 

Sivarajan, K. (2018). Educational Technology. Bengaluru: University Science Press. 

Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L. & Russell, J. D. (2012). Intructional technology and media for learning. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson. 

Smith, S., & Talley, K. (2018). ‘‘Lend a hand’’ project helps students: Improved spatial visualization skills through engaging in hands-on 3-D printed prosthetics project during a 9th grade engineering course. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 8(1). 

Sopamena, P., Lifumangau, A., Kaliky, S., Juhaevah, F., Sehuwaky, N., Sopamena, N. (2021). Application of the Assure Learning Model on Geometry. Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 31-42. 

Stein, H. (2020). Education and Information Technologies. 25:141–161.  

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam & T.Kellaghan (Eds.), The international handbook of educational evaluation (Chapter 2). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, & applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 

Su Y-S, Cheng H-W and Lai C-F (2022). Study of Virtual Reality Immersive Technology Enhanced Mathematics Geometry Learning. Front. Psychol. 13:760418. 

Tan Tong Hock. (2016). Effects Of Van Hiele's Phases of Learning And Theory of Geometry Thinking on Geometry Learning of Malaysian Year Five Students. Tesis PhD UPM: Tidak diterbitkan. 

Tay, B. L. (2003). A van Hiele-based instruction and its impact on the geometry achievement of Form One students. M Ed. diss., University of Malaya. 

Turgut, M., and Urgan, C. (2015). Designing Spatial Visualisation Tasks for Middle School Students with a 3D Modelling Software: An Instrumental Approach. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 22(1), 45–51. 

Uden, L & Beaumont, C. (2006). Technology and problem-based learning. London: Information Science Publishing. 

Usiskin, Z. (2002). Teachers need a special type of content knowledge. ENC Focus, 9 (3), 14-15. 

Usiskin, Z. and Chicago Univ., I. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry. CDASSG Project. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Van+Hiele+Levels+and+Achievement+in+Secondary+School+Geometry.+CDASSG+Project&id=ED220288. 

Uswatun Hasanah , Lia Indriani , Tia Nurhidayah, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (SNPM) III, 2021  Tema: Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Berbantuan Media Digital di Era New Normal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Univeristas Swadaya Gunung Jati (UGJ), Cirebon 

Uygan, C , Kurtulus, A . (2016). Effects of Teaching Activities via Google Sketchup and Concrete Models on Spatial Skills of Preservice Mathematics Teachers . Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 7 (3) , 510-535. 

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., and Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3). 

Van de Walle, J., Karp, K, & Williams, J. M. B, (2010). Elementary & Middle School Mathematics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon 

van Hiele, (1956). The Child’s Thought And Geometry, trans. by R. Tischler. Bulletin de l‘association des professeurs de mathematique de l‘enseignment public, 38e annee N0 198, pp. 1-10. 

van Hiele-Geldof, D. (1959/1984). Last article written by Dina van Hiele-Geldof entitled: Didactics of geometry as learning process for adults. In D. Fuys, D. Geddes and R. Tischler (eds.). School of Education, Brooklyn, NY: School of Education, Brooklyn College, 215–233. 

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. 

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. MA: Harvard University Press. 

Wahab, R A, Abdullah, A. H., Abu, M. S., Atan, N. A., Mokhtar, M., & Hamzah, M. H. (2018). A learning 3d geometry through sketchup make (Sppd) enhance visual spatial skills and the level of geometric a learning 3d geometry through sketchup make. J Fundam Appl Sci, 10(6S), 1005–1039. 

Wahab, R. A., Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Atan, N. A. & Abu, M. S. (2016). A Case Study on Visual Spatial Skills and Level of Geometric Thinking in Learning 3D Geometry. Man In India, 96 (2016), 489-499. 

Wardhani, I. S. (2020). Geometri dan Permasalahannya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah (Suatu Penelitian Meta Analisis). In Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai-Nilai Islami), 3 (1), 124-129. 

Warmi, A. (2018). Penggunaan software Cabri 3D dalam pembelajaran matematika upaya meningkatkan kemampuan visualisasi spasial matematis siswa. Jurnal Silogisme: Kajian Ilmu Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, 3(1), 28-35. 

Wilder, J.S. & Mason, J. (2005). Developing Thinking in Geometry. London: Paul Chapman Educational Publishing. 

Witkin, B.R. (1997). Needs assessment kits, model and tools. Educational Technology, 17(11), 5-18. 

Wong, S. L., Wong, S. L. & Ayub, M. A. F (2020). Application of geometer’s sketchpad in malaysian schools: A literature review, ASM Sc. J., 13, Special Issue 3, 2020 for CIIDT2018, 24-31. 

Wulandari, R., Suwarto, & Novaliyosi. (2021). Upaya Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Geometri Ruang pada Pembelajaran Daring dengan Model Discovery learning. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 197-206. 

Yahya, F. H, Adenan, N.H, Murtafiah, W. & Shamsuddin, N.R. (2022). Integration of video tutorial screencast sketchup make (VTS-SUM) to enhance students’ visual spatial skills, Central asia and The Caucausus,23 (1),1876-1883. 

Yahya, F. H., Wahab, R. A., Atan, N. A., & Ibrahim, A. B. (2019). The effects of video tutorial screencast sketchup make (VTS-SUM) in learning 3D geometry for low achievers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10 D), 19–23. 

Yanuarto, W.N. (2016). Students’ awareness on example and non-example learning in geometry class. Int. Electronic J. Math. Educ., 11, 3511-3519. 

Yusuf Hashim & Razmah Man (2006). Teknologi instruksional teori dan aplikasi. Tanjong Malim: Syarikat Perintis Tanjong Malim. 

Zaranis, N. & Synodi, E. (2017). A comparative study on the effectiveness of the computer assisted method and the interactionist approach to teaching geometry shapes to young children. Educ Inf Technol, 22, 1377–1393.