|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| This study explored the attitudes of undergraduate students at Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) toward ChatGPT and examined its relationship with cognitive motivation and problem-solving skills. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing an online survey with 161 valid responses. The study used the Technology Acceptance Model Edited to Assess ChatGPT Adoption (TAME-ChatGPT) scale, the Need for Cognition (NFC) scale, and the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI) scale to measure students' attitudes, cognitive motivation, and problem-solving abilities. The results indicated a significant positive relationship between students_ attitudes toward ChatGPT and their cognitive motivation, suggesting that higher acceptance of ChatGPT corresponds with increased cognitive engagement. However, no significant relationship was found between attitudes toward ChatGPT and problem-solving skills, indicating that while ChatGPT may encourage cognitive effort, it does not directly enhance problem-solving abilities. These findings highlight the potential of ChatGPT as a tool for fostering student engagement and cognitive motivation in educational settings. However, its role in developing problem-solving skills remains uncertain, emphasizing the need for educators to consider complementary instructional strategies. Future research should explore broader sample representations and mixed-method approaches to provide deeper insights into the role of AI in learning. |
| References |
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., Khatib, S. E., Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1983. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8
Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., Khatib, S. E., Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Factors influencing attitudes of university students towards ChatGPT and its usage: A multi-national study validating the TAME-ChatGPT survey instrument. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.1541.v1
Abdullah, S. M. (2019). Social Cognitive Theory : A Bandura Thought Review published in 1982-2012. Psikodimensia: Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi, 18(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.24167/psidim.v18i1.1708
Ajlouni, A. O., Wahba, F. A.-A., & Almahaireh, A. S. (2023). Students’ perception of using ChatGPT in counseling and mental health education: The benefits and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(20), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i20.42075
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Cognitive Theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development: Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
Bartlett, D. J. (2011). Cognitive behavioral therapy to increase adherence to continuous positive airway pressure. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 215–221) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-381522-4.00022-5
Bian, N., Han, X., Sun, L., Lin, H., Lu, Y., & He, B. (2023). ChatGPT is a knowledgeable but inexperienced solver: An investigation of commonsense problems in large language models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2303.16421
Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 475–488). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816833.029
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.42.1.116
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
Caratiquit, K., & Caratiquit, J. C. (2023). ChatGPT as an academic support tool on the academic performance among students: The mediating role of learning motivation. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 4(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v4i1.1558
Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., Refae, G. A. E., & Chabchoub, H. (2023). Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of CHATGPT — a case study. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2210461
Chan, M. M. K., Wong, I. S. F., Yau, S. Y., & Lam, V. S. F. (2023). Critical reflection on using ChatGPT in student learning: Benefits or potential risks? Nurse Educator. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001476
Chan, C., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002
Das, S.R. & Madhusudan J.V. (2024). Perceptions of higher education students towards ChatGPT usage. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.583
Darma, R. N., Syahid, A., Fatma, Lestari, A., Basahil, A., & Ningrum, R. L. (2023). The student’s perception of using ChatGPT for EFL students. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nasional, 1(3), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.59435/jipnas.v1i3.193
Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education. Sustainability, 15(4), 2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042940
Dohrenwend, B. S., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1978). Some Issues in Research on Stressful Life Events. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 166(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-197801000-00003
Duarte, F. (2024, March 1). Number of ChatGPT users (Mar 2024). Exploding Topics. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0203_3
Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(11), 2599–2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181
Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66
Heppner, P. P., Baumgardner, A., & Jackson, J. (1985). Problem-solving self-appraisal, depression, and attributional style: Are they related? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01178754
Heppner, P. P., & Baker, C. E. (1997). Applications of the problem-solving inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29(4), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.1997.12068907
Heppner, P. P., Lee, D.-G., & Tian, L. (2009). Problem-solving appraisal and psychological adjustment. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0032
Hevey, D., Thomas, K., Pertl, M., Maher, L., Craig, A., & Ní Chuinneagain, S.(2012). Method Effects and the Need for Cognition Scale.
Jeevita, J., & Liew, S. (2024, March 17). An eye on AI. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2024/03/17/an-eye-on-ai
Kim, J. Y., Choi, D. S., Sung, C.-S., & Park, J. Y. (2018). The role of problem-solving ability on innovative behavior and opportunity recognition in university students. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(1). Springeropen. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0085-4
Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of CHATGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410.
Mail, M. (2023, June 13). ChatGPT usage in Malaysia must adhere to set guidelines, says the higher education minister. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/06/13/chatgpt-usage-in-malaysia-must-adhere-to-set-guidelines-says-higher-education-minister/73997
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of Generative AI for higher Education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Mills, J. G. (2022, October 18). Demographics | Everything you need to know with examples | SuperSurvey. https://rb.gy/9ecp1t.
Mosaiyebzadeh, F., Pouriyeh, S., Parizi, R. M., Dehbozorgi, N., Dorodchi, M., & Batista, D. M. (2023). Exploring the role of ChatGPT in education: Applications and challenges. SIGITE ’23: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585059.3611445
Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370
Nayak, M. S. D. P. N., & Narayan, K. A. (2019). Strengths and weaknesses of online surveys. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IOSR-JHSS), 24(5), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2405053138
Olufemi, T. (2012). In: Psychology of attitudes theories of attitudes. https://www.novapublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/978-1-62081-194-8_ch3.pdf
Pallivathukal, R. G., Soe, H. H. K., Donald, P. M., Samson, R. S., & Ismail, A. R. H. (2024). ChatGPT for academic purposes: Survey among undergraduate healthcare students in Malaysia. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53032
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
Rahman, M. (2019). 21st century skill “problem solving”: Defining the concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917
Sallam, M. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research and practice: Systematic review on the future perspectives and potential limitations. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.23286155
Sallam, M., Salim, N. A., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Validation of a technology acceptance model-based scale TAME-ChatGPT on health students attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan (Preprint). https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.48254
Sánchez-Reina, J. R., Theophilou, E., Hernández-Leo, D., & Ognibene, D. (2024). Exploring undergraduates’ attitudes towards ChatGPT: Is AI resistance constraining the acceptance of chatbot technology? TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.171173454.45591400/v1
Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 13–27). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0002
Sun, D., Azzeddine Boudouaia, Zhu, C., & Li, Y. (2024). Would ChatGPT-facilitated programming mode impact college students’ programming behaviors, performances, and perceptions? An empirical study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00446-5
Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2023). What have people discussed about ChatGPT in Malaysian education? A qualitative content analysis of news articles. European Conference on e-Learning, 22(1), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.22.1.1557
Tepfenhart, W. M. (1994). Attitudes: Keys to problem identification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58328-9_9
Thomas, J. (2023, March 17). Higher education ministry working on guidelines for ChatGPT. Free Malaysia Today. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2023/03/17/higher-education-ministry-working-on-guidelines-for-chatgpt/
Urban, M., Filip Dechterenko, Jirí Lukavský, Hrabalová, V., Filip Svacha, Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031
Vuovic, D. (2024). Generative AI: Riding the new general purpose technology storm. Ekonomika Preduzec´a, 72(1-2), 125–136.https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopre2402125vj
Wang, Y., & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem-solving. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(1), 81–92.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.003
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest, 158(1S), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020 .0 3.012
Zhou, L., & Li, J. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: A study based on self-determination theory. Education Science and Management, 1(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.56578/esm010103
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |