UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :Final Year Project
Subject :BF Psychology
Main Author :Nurhuda Dini Mohd Nasir
Title :Examining the relationship between attitude toward ChatGpt, cognitive motivation and problem-solving skills among undergraduate students in Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Hits :2
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2024
Corporate Name :Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
This study explored the attitudes of undergraduate students at Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) toward ChatGPT and examined its relationship with cognitive motivation and problem-solving skills. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing an online survey with 161 valid responses. The study used the Technology Acceptance Model Edited to Assess ChatGPT Adoption (TAME-ChatGPT) scale, the Need for Cognition (NFC) scale, and the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI) scale to measure students' attitudes, cognitive motivation, and problem-solving abilities. The results indicated a significant positive relationship between students_ attitudes toward ChatGPT and their cognitive motivation, suggesting that higher acceptance of ChatGPT corresponds with increased cognitive engagement. However, no significant relationship was found between attitudes toward ChatGPT and problem-solving skills, indicating that while ChatGPT may encourage cognitive effort, it does not directly enhance problem-solving abilities. These findings highlight the potential of ChatGPT as a tool for fostering student engagement and cognitive motivation in educational settings. However, its role in developing problem-solving skills remains uncertain, emphasizing the need for educators to consider complementary instructional strategies. Future research should explore broader sample representations and mixed-method approaches to provide deeper insights into the role of AI in learning.

References

Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7 

 

Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., Khatib, S. E., Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1983. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8 

 

Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., Khatib, S. E., Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Factors influencing attitudes of university students towards ChatGPT and its usage: A multi-national study validating the TAME-ChatGPT survey instrument. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.1541.v1 

 

Abdullah, S. M. (2019). Social Cognitive Theory : A Bandura Thought Review published in 1982-2012. Psikodimensia: Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi, 18(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.24167/psidim.v18i1.1708 

 

Ajlouni, A. O., Wahba, F. A.-A., & Almahaireh, A. S. (2023). Students’ perception of using ChatGPT in counseling and mental health education: The benefits and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(20), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i20.42075 

 

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Cognitive Theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development: Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 

 

Bartlett, D. J. (2011). Cognitive behavioral therapy to increase adherence to continuous positive airway pressure. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 215–221) https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-381522-4.00022-5 

 

Bian, N., Han, X., Sun, L., Lin, H., Lu, Y., & He, B. (2023). ChatGPT is a knowledgeable but inexperienced solver: An investigation of commonsense problems in large language models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2303.16421 

 

Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 475–488). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816833.029 

 

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.42.1.116 

 

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 

 

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 

 

Caratiquit, K., & Caratiquit, J. C. (2023). ChatGPT as an academic support tool on the academic performance among students: The mediating role of learning motivation. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 4(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v4i1.1558 

 

Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., Refae, G. A. E., & Chabchoub, H. (2023). Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of CHATGPT — a case study. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2210461 

 

Chan, M. M. K., Wong, I. S. F., Yau, S. Y., & Lam, V. S. F. (2023). Critical reflection on using ChatGPT in student learning: Benefits or potential risks? Nurse Educator. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001476 

 

Chan, C., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 

 

Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074 

 

Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002 

 

Das, S.R. & Madhusudan J.V. (2024). Perceptions of higher education students towards ChatGPT usage. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.583 

 

Darma, R. N., Syahid, A., Fatma, Lestari, A., Basahil, A., & Ningrum, R. L. (2023). The student’s perception of using ChatGPT for EFL students. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nasional, 1(3), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.59435/jipnas.v1i3.193 

 

Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education. Sustainability, 15(4), 2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042940 

 

Dohrenwend, B. S., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1978). Some Issues in Research on Stressful Life Events. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 166(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-197801000-00003 

 

Duarte, F. (2024, March 1). Number of ChatGPT users (Mar 2024). Exploding Topics. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users 

 

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692 

 

Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0203_3 

 

Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(11), 2599–2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181 

 

Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66 

 

Heppner, P. P., Baumgardner, A., & Jackson, J. (1985). Problem-solving self-appraisal, depression, and attributional style: Are they related? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01178754 

 

Heppner, P. P., & Baker, C. E. (1997). Applications of the problem-solving inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29(4), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.1997.12068907 

 

Heppner, P. P., Lee, D.-G., & Tian, L. (2009). Problem-solving appraisal and psychological adjustment. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0032 

 

Hevey, D., Thomas, K., Pertl, M., Maher, L., Craig, A., & Ní Chuinneagain, S.(2012). Method Effects and the Need for Cognition Scale. 

 

Jeevita, J., & Liew, S. (2024, March 17). An eye on AI. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2024/03/17/an-eye-on-ai 

 

Kim, J. Y., Choi, D. S., Sung, C.-S., & Park, J. Y. (2018). The role of problem-solving ability on innovative behavior and opportunity recognition in university students. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(1). Springeropen. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0085-4 

 

Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4 

 

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of CHATGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410. 

 

Mail, M. (2023, June 13). ChatGPT usage in Malaysia must adhere to set guidelines, says the higher education minister. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/06/13/chatgpt-usage-in-malaysia-must-adhere-to-set-guidelines-says-higher-education-minister/73997 

 

Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of Generative AI for higher Education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856 

 

Mills, J. G. (2022, October 18). Demographics | Everything you need to know with examples | SuperSurvey. https://rb.gy/9ecp1t. 

 

Mosaiyebzadeh, F., Pouriyeh, S., Parizi, R. M., Dehbozorgi, N., Dorodchi, M., & Batista, D. M. (2023). Exploring the role of ChatGPT in education: Applications and challenges. SIGITE ’23: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585059.3611445 

 

Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370 

 

Nayak, M. S. D. P. N., & Narayan, K. A. (2019). Strengths and weaknesses of online surveys. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IOSR-JHSS), 24(5), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2405053138 

 

Olufemi, T. (2012). In: Psychology of attitudes theories of attitudes. https://www.novapublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/978-1-62081-194-8_ch3.pdf 

 

Pallivathukal, R. G., Soe, H. H. K., Donald, P. M., Samson, R. S., & Ismail, A. R. H. (2024). ChatGPT for academic purposes: Survey among undergraduate healthcare students in Malaysia. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53032 

 

Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783 

 

Rahman, M. (2019). 21st century skill “problem solving”: Defining the concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917 

 

Sallam, M. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research and practice: Systematic review on the future perspectives and potential limitations. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.23286155 

 

Sallam, M., Salim, N. A., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Validation of a technology acceptance model-based scale TAME-ChatGPT on health students attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan (Preprint). https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.48254 

 

Sánchez-Reina, J. R., Theophilou, E., Hernández-Leo, D., & Ognibene, D. (2024). Exploring undergraduates’ attitudes towards ChatGPT: Is AI resistance constraining the acceptance of chatbot technology? TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.171173454.45591400/v1 

 

Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 13–27). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0002 

 

Sun, D., Azzeddine Boudouaia, Zhu, C., & Li, Y. (2024). Would ChatGPT-facilitated programming mode impact college students’ programming behaviors, performances, and perceptions? An empirical study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00446-5 

 

Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2023). What have people discussed about ChatGPT in Malaysian education? A qualitative content analysis of news articles. European Conference on e-Learning, 22(1), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.22.1.1557 

 

Tepfenhart, W. M. (1994). Attitudes: Keys to problem identification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58328-9_9 

 

Thomas, J. (2023, March 17). Higher education ministry working on guidelines for ChatGPT. Free Malaysia Today. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2023/03/17/higher-education-ministry-working-on-guidelines-for-chatgpt/ 

 

Urban, M., Filip Dechterenko, Jirí Lukavský, Hrabalová, V., Filip Svacha, Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031 

 

Vuovic, D. (2024). Generative AI: Riding the new general purpose technology storm. Ekonomika Preduzec´a, 72(1-2), 125–136.https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopre2402125vj 

 

Wang, Y., & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem-solving. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(1), 81–92.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.003 

 

Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest, 158(1S), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020 .0 3.012 

 

Zhou, L., & Li, J. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: A study based on self-determination theory. Education Science and Management, 1(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.56578/esm010103 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.