|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan e-modul pembelajaran interaktif _GetBijak_ bagi meningkatkan pemahaman konsep Get Logik dan menilai tahap penerimaannya dalam kalangan mahasiswa Fizik Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). Kajian menggunakan reka bentuk pembangunan berdasarkan model instruksional ADDIE yang terdiri daripada lima fasa: analisis, reka bentuk, pembangunan, pelaksanaan, dan penilaian. Seramai 45 orang mahasiswa Fizik UPSI Semester 7 dipilih sebagai sampel kajian menggunakan teknik pensampelan rawak mudah. Instrumen kajian terdiri daripada borang kesahan pakar dan soal selidik tahap penerimaan modul. Data kajian yang dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif untuk mendapatkan nilai peratus persetujuan pakar, min (M) dan sisihan piawai (SP). Analisis kesahan menunjukkan e-modul yang dibangunkan mempunyai nilai kesahan muka dan kandungan yang sangat tinggi iaitu 93.75% dan 93.30%. Analisis tahap penerimaan modul pula menunjukkan mahasiswa fizik mempunyai tahap penerimaan yang tinggi terhadap e-modul yang dibangunkan: tanggapan kebergunaan (M = 3.87; SP = 0.266), tanggapan kemudahan penggunaan (M = 3.80; SP = 0.331), sikap terhadap penggunaan (M = 3.84;SP = 0.292), dan keinginan bertingkah laku (M = 3.80; SP = 0.428). Secara keseluruhannya, e-modul _GetBijak_ mempunyai tahap penerimaan yang tinggi dalam kalangan mahasiswa fizik UPSI (M = 3.83; SP = 0.329). Implikasi kajian ini ialah, e-modul _GetBijak_ boleh digunakan sebagai bahan bantu belajar untuk meningkatkan tahap kefahaman pelajar terhadap konsep Get Logik bagi kursus Asas Elektronik pada peringkat Ijazah Sarjana Muda. |
| References |
Akçayir, M., & Akçayir, G. (2017). The use of augmented reality in education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.003 Ali, K. Mohd. (2023, August 20). Penurunan penyertaan pelajar dalam jurusan STEM boleh menjejaskan kemampuan Malaysia untuk bersaing di peringkat global. Kosmo. Retrieved from https://www.kosmo.com.my/2023/08/20/penurunan-minat-golongan-muda-terhadap-stem-membimbangkan/ Alvarez, S. (2023). Enhancing student learning through interactive e-modules: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1037/edg0000715 Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Graf, S., & Usart, M. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-146. Bolarinwa, O. A. (2015). Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 22(4), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-1936.173959 Brennan, R. (2018). Misconceptions in Boolean logic: Addressing the gap between theory and practice. Journal of Computer Science Education, 22(2), 155-170. Brown, A., & Smith, R. (2021). Hands-on learning for complex topics: The role of practical exercises in education. Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 44-58. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DeMara, R. (2007). Integrating practical applications of Boolean logic into the curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00928.x DeMara, R. F. (2007). Teaching logic gate fundamentals using interactive techniques. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(2), 125-131. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Pearson. Fauzi Hussin, Jamal Ali & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor. (2014). Reka Bentuk Kajian [Research Design]. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley. Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.Gay, Ghavifekr, S., & Wong, K. T. (2022). The role of ICT in enhancing teaching and learning in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 44(3), 456-478. Ghavifekr, S., Afshari, M., & Ismail, H. N. (2022). Technology integration in education: A systematic review of the factors influencing the adoption of ICT in schools. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10683-x Harian Metro (2024, January 30). Kini PdP lebih menyeronokkan Berita Harian. Retrieved from https://www.hmetro.com.my/rencana/2024/01/1055590/kini-pdp-lebih-menyeronokkan Herdiana, H. (2021). The role of e-modules in enhancing students' interest and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 234-250. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2007). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3 Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 47(2), 16-22. Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D. G., & Newman, T. B. (2013). Designing clinical research (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Jamaludin Ahmad. (2004). Pendidikan: Satu pengenalan. PTS Publications. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Constructivist learning environments on the web: Engaging students in meaningful learning. Educational Technology Publications. Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2001). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Wadsworth. Kim, J. (2019). User acceptance of mobile learning systems: A study on the role of mobile user experience. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(1), 68-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518824261 Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 Mills, G. E., Airasian, P., & L. R. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson.Lasala, C. (2023). Self-directed learning through e-modules: Motivating and engaging students. Journal of Online Learning Research, 9(1), 77-95. Lee, C. H. (2020). Effectiveness of instructional materials in teaching logical gates. Asian Journal of Education, 12(1), 78-89. Lee, J. (2020). The effects of educational technology on learning outcomes: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edut.2020.02.003 Liu, X., Chung, J., & Wang, L. (2020). Systematic development of instructional materials: The ADDIE model in practice. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(3), 361-377. Mackenzie, N., & Jansen, M. (1998). Multimedia learning: What can we learn from it? Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021329904453 Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819 Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Mohd Zaliman, M., & Manjit Singh, S. (2001). The role of multimedia in education: A review. Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 45–56. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. Nur Diyana, M., Siti Nurbaya, M. A., & Ahmad, H. (2021). Penggunaan Augmented Reality (AR) dalam pembelajaran konsep Get Logik semasa pandemik COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edut.2021.06.005 Nurul Liyana, M. Z. (2023). The lack of appropriate teaching aids for demonstrating logical gate operations. Journal of Physics Education Research, 15(3), 123-135. Pedaste, M. (2015). Involvement of students in science learning through inquiry-based methods. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1724-1741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1059027 Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623-1640. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x Riduwan. (2012). Belajar mudah penelitian untuk guru-karyawan dan peneliti pemula. Alfabeta. Rosen, Y., & Stewart, R. (2017). Problem-based learning in physics education: A review. Physics Education, 52(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aa76d0 Russo, A., & Hopkins, P. (2015). Understanding the effects of input combinations on logic gate outputs. Journal of Electronics Education, 23(3), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jed.ele.2015.02.007 Sajith, A., & Kuriakose, J. (2016). Expanding the understanding of Boolean logic beyond binary values. International Journal of Computer Applications, 141(5), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016910541 Sajith, B., & Kuriakose, S. (2016). Misconceptions in Boolean logic among high school students. International Journal of Computer Science Education, 17(2), 178-190. Schneider, E. F. (2014). Using simulations in education: The evolution of a pedagogy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(3), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9349-2 Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Kajian tindakan: Prinsip dan aplikasi. McGraw-Hill. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2019). Instructional design. Wiley. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Taherdoost, H. (2018). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040 Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ASCD. Venkatesh, V. (2016). Technology acceptance model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 95-110). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n15 Venkatesh, V. (2016). User acceptance of technology: A critical review. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.28 Wakerly, J. F. (2018). Digital design: Principles and practices. Pearson. Wang, M., Chen, Y., & Liu, Z. (2020). The role of logic gates in the development of intelligent systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.03.001 Watson, C. E. (2009). Bridging the gap: Enhancing students' understanding of logic gates through practical application. Journal of Engineering and Technology Education, 20(1), 22-34. Watson, G. (2009). Teaching problem-solving skills: A focus on Boolean logic. Journal of Engineering Education, 15(4), 103-110. Watson, R. (2009). Bridging the gap between theory and practice in logic gate education. Journal of Educational Practice, 12(2), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.01.003 Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |