The secondary schools Physics students readiness and perceived understanding of light and optic nature-based learning: a survey study

Sandra Thor Kai Ly

QR Code Link :
Type :	Final Year Project
Subject :	QC Physics
Main Author :	Sandra Thor Kai Ly
Title :	The secondary schools Physics students readiness and perceived understanding of light and optic nature-based learning: a survey study
Hits :	9

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2025
Corporate Name :	Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
PDF Guest :	Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :	You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun

This study investigates the readiness and perceived understanding of secondary school physics students in Sarikei, Sarawak, regarding the implementation of light and optics nature-based learning (NBL). The objectives were to evaluate students' readiness, their perceived understanding of light and optics, and the correlation between these two variables. A quantitative survey with Likert-scale questionnaire design was employed, targeting 100 Form 4 science stream students using cluster random sampling. The validity and reliability of the instrument were tested through a pilot study, yielding a Cronbach's alpha value above 0.8, indicating high reliability. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and Spearmen Correlation, showed that high levels of student readiness and perceived understanding, with significant correlations between students' readiness and their perceived understanding of light and optics in NBL contexts. Students acknowledged the academic and experiential benefits of NBL, highlighting its role in fostering critical thinking and enhancing engagement. The study concludes that integrating nature-based learning into the physics curriculum can improve students_ comprehension of complex topics like light and optics. The results suggest that future educators should consider adopting NBL to enrich physics education.

References

Ahad,N.A.,Yin,T. S.,Othman,A. R.,&Yaacob,C. R.(2011). Sensitivityofnormality tests to non-normal data. Sains Malaysiana, 40(6), 637-641. https://journalarticle.ukm.my/2511/

Ahmad, H., Naderi, N., & Yasin, M. (2023). Ultrafast photoresponse in ultraviolet detectors based on zinc oxide nanorods: the effect of a graphene capping layer. JournalofMaterialsScience: Materials in Electronics, 34(1), 38.

Archibald, J. D.(1989). The natureofscience. Nature, 342(6248), 338-338.

Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: Aguide to selecting appropriate researchdesign.International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches,6(5), 76-89.

Bai,J.,&Ng,S.(2005).Testsforskewness,kurtosis,and normalityfortimeseriesdata. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 23(1),49-60.

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1, pp. 141-154). EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.

Bastos, J. L., Duquia, R. P., González-Chica, D.A., Mesa, J. M., & Bonamigo, R. R. (2014). Field work I: Selecting the instrument for data collection. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 89(6), 918-923.

Beames, S., & Ross, H. (2010). "The role of outdoor learning in supporting the curriculum." Scottish Educational Review, 42(2),38-50.

Chawla, L. (2006). "Learning to love the Earth: The impact of nature-based learning experiences." Children, Youth, and Environments, 16(1),30-56.

Chala, A., Kedir, I., & Wami, S. (2020). Secondary school students’ beliefs towards learning physics and its influencing factors. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(7),37-49. https://doi.org/10.7176/rhss/10-7-05.

Collins,A., Joseph, D., &Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoreticaland methodologicalissues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15 -42.

Connelly, L. M. (2008). Pilot studies. Medsurg nursing, 17(6), 411. https://www.proquest.com/openview/553d762f3224a627486acfbf1a7320e0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=30764

Cotic, N., Plazar, J., Istenic Starcic, A., & Zuljan, D. (2020). The effect of outdoor lessons in natural sciences on students' knowledge, through tablets and experientiallearning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5),747-763.

Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D.A., &Irdianti, I. (2019). Physics educationstudents' science process skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 293-298.

Drezner, Z., &Turel, O. (2011). Normalizing variableswithtoo-frequent valuesusing aKolmogorov–Smirnovtest: Apracticalapproach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(4),1240-1244

Eysenck, H. (1985). Behaviourismand clinicalpsychiatry. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 31(3), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076408503100301

FaberTaylor,A.,Butts-Wilmsmeyer,C.,&Jordan,C. (2022). Nature-based instruction for science learning–a good fit for all: A controlled comparison of classroom versusnature. Environmental Education Research, 28(10), 1527-1546.

Falcão, T., & Costa, J. (2016). "Nature-based education: An effective tool to improve children’slearning outcomes."Environmental Education Research, 22(4),501-515.

Fernández-Gómez, E., Martín-Salvador, A., Luque-Vara, T., Sánchez-Ojeda, M. A., Navarro-Prado, S., & Enrique-Mirón, C. (2020). Content validation through expert judgement of an instrument on the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits of pregnant women. Nutrients, 12(4), 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041136

Gentles,S.J.,Charles,C.,Ploeg,J.,&McKibbon,K.A.(2015).Sampling inqualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The qualitative report, 20(11), 1772-1789.

Ghavifekr, S. (2020). Collaborative learning: a key to enhance students’ social interaction skills. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(4),9-21.

Grange, L., & Slavin, R. (2012). "Effects of cooperative learning on academic achievement in higher education." Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1244-1256.

Gunawan, I., & Muflihati, M. (2022). The relationship between self-confidence and problem-solving ability in highschoolstudents. Journal of Educational Research, 25(3),45–53.

Guzzini, S. (2000).Areconstructionofconstructivism in internationalrelations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147 -182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006002001.

Hamzah, M. I. M., Juraime, F., & Mansor, A. N. (2016). Malaysian principals’ technologyleadership practicesand curriculummanagement. Creative Education, 7(07),922.

Hatem,G.,Zeidan,J.,Goossens,M.,&Moreira,C. (2022). Normalitytesting methods and the importance of skewness and kurtosis in statistical analysis. BAU Journal-Science and Technology, 3(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.54729/KTPE9512

Hauke,J.,&Kossowski,T. (2011). ComparisonofValuesofPearson'sand Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data, 30, 87 -93. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1.

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-based nursing, 18(3), 66-67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280840011_Validity_and_reliability_i n_quantitative_research

Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in nursing & health, 31(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247

Hopkins, S., Dettori, J., & Chapman, J. (2018). Parametric and nonparametric tests in spine research: Why do they matter? Global Spine Journal, 8(6), 652 -654. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218782679.

Hughes, S.,Davis,T. E., &Imenda, S. N. (2019). Demystifying theoreticaland conceptual frameworks: A guide for students and advisors of educational research. J Soc Sci, 58(1-3), 24-35.

Indriani,K. S.,&Widiastuti,N.M.A. (2024). Students’perceptionasreview providers and receivers on writing. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 11(1),1-9.

Ioannidis, J. P. (2007). Limitationsare not properly acknowledged inthe scientific literature. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 60(4),324-329.

Johnson, K., Desmarais, S.,Tueller, S.,&Dorn, R. (2019). Methodologicallimitations in the measurement and statistical modelling of violence among adults with mental illness. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 28(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1776.

Johnstone,A., McCrorie, P., Cordovil, R., Fjørtoft, I., Iivonen, S., Jidovtseff, B., ... & Martin, A. (2022). Nature-based early childhood education and children’s physical activity, sedentary behavior, motor competence, and other physical health outcomes: a mixed-methods systematic review. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 19(6), 456-472.

Jordan,C.,Sajady, M.,&FaberTaylor,A. (2023).Nature-based instructionforscience learning: Insights and interpretive considerations for research and practice. Environmental Education Research, 29(2), 248-260.

Kadir, N. S.,&Yaacob, M. I. H.(2022,July). The development and usabilityofoptics kit as a teaching aid among physics trainee teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1), 12-40.IOPPublishing.

Kahyaoglu, M., Karakaya-Bilen, E., &Saracoglu,M. (2021). Impact ofecology-based natureeducationonthebehaviorofsecondaryschoolstudents. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(4) 364-382.https://doi.org/10.46827/EJES.V8I4.3706.

Kohlstedt,S. (2005). Nature,not books. Isis, 96(3), 324-352. https://doi.org/10.1086/447745.

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Research methodology, 1-528.

Kuo, M.,Barnes, M., &Jordan, C. (2022). Do experienceswith nature promote learning?Converging evidence ofacause-and-effect relationship. High-Quality Outdoor Learning, 47-66.

Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits ofcollaborative learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31,486–490.

Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Noncognitive factors in problem-solving performance. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(4),8–14.

Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmentalawareness: Approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environmental Education Research, 14(1),1-17.

Moleta, N. M., & Yango, A. R. (2023). Schools' readiness, teachers' proficiency, and sciencetechnologyengineering and mathematics(STEM)students'preparedness for higher education. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 44(1),145.

Moore,J. (2011). Behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 449-463.

Morris,T. (2019). Experientiallearning – a systematicreview and revisionofKolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8),1064 -1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279.

Oberle, E., Zeni, M., Munday, F., & Brussoni, M. (2021). Support factorsand barriers for outdoor learning in elementary schools: a systemic perspective. American Journal of Health Education, 52(5), 251 -265. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2021.1955232.

Ogegbo, A. (2023). Students’ perceptions about the influence of school environment on their academic performance in physics. Education and New Developments 2023, 2(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v2end140.

Onal, N. T., & Cevik, E. E. (2022). Science Education in Outdoor Learning Environments from the Perspective of Preschool Teachers: Definitions, Opportunities, Obstacles, and Possible Solutions. Malaysian online journal of educationalsciences, 10(1), 37-51.

Otto, S.,&Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmentaleducationofchildren: Environmentalknowledgeand connectednessto nature,together, arerelated to ecologicalbehaviour. Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 47, 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2017.09.009.

Palupi,M. E. (2023). Englishlearning using nature-based learning methodsto increase student motivation. JELL (Journal of English Language and Literature) STIBAIEC Jakarta, 8(02),157-166.

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity?Appraisaland recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4),459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199

Prosser, M., Walker, P., & Millar, R. (1996). Differences in students' perceptions of learning physics. Physics Education, 31(1),43.

Reid,A. (1988). Questionnaires. Medical Journal of Australia, 148(10), 543-544.

Roopa, S., & Rani, M. S. (2012). Questionnaire designing for a survey. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(4), 273-277.

Samad, R., Ibrahim, A., & Nor, M. (2008). Teaching strategy. Alqalam, 25(2), 321 342. https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v25i2.1687.

Schrodt,P.,Turman,P. D.,&Soliz,J. (2006).Perceived understanding asamediatorof perceived teacher confirmation and students’ ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 55(4),370-388.

Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate useand interpretation. Anesthesia & analgesia, 126(5),1763-1768.

Schunk, D., &DiBenedetto, M. (2023).Albert Bandura’s legacyin education. Theory Into Practice, 62(3), 205 -206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2226560.

Sebald,J.,Fliegauf, K.,Veith,J. M.,Spiecker,H.,& Bitzenbauer,P. (2022).Theworld through my eyes: Fostering students’ understanding of basic optics concepts related to visionand image formation. Physics, 4(4), 1117-1134.

Sedgwick, P. (2012). Pearson’scorrelationcoefficient. Bmj, 345.

Shire, M. (2022). Nature-based education professional development for reducing children’ssedentaryscreenlifeatthe Universityof Delaware LaboratorySchool. University of Delaware. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/nature based-education-professional-development/docview/2701078491/se-2

Sidek,M. N.,&Jamaludin,A. (2005). Modulebuilding: How to build exercisemodule and academic module. Serdang: University Putra Malaysia Publisher.

Sobel, D. (2008). Childhood and Nature: Design Principles for Educators. Stenhouse Publishers.

Sullivan, G. M. (2011).Aprimer onthe validityof assessment instruments. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 3(2), 119-120. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D11-00075.1

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11165-016-96022.pdf?pdf=button

Tal,T.,LavieAlon,N.,&Morag,O.(2014).Exemplarypracticesinfield tripstonatural environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4),430-461.

Tandy, R. (1998). Technical note: the initial stages of statistical data analysis. Journal of Athletic Training, 331,69-71.

Tho, S. W., Chan, K. W., & Yeung, Y. Y. (2015). Technology-enhanced physics programme for community-based science learning: Innovative design and programme evaluation in a theme park. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 580-594.

Tho, S. W., Lee, T. T., & Baharom, S. (2018). Scientific investigation through innovativeuseofmobiledevicesintheplayground. Teaching Science, 64(2),25– 29. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.645569313218318

Ulum, M., &Fauzi,A. (2023). Behaviorismtheoryand its implications for learning. Journal of Insan Mulia Education, 1(2),53-57. https://doi.org/10.59923/joinme.v1i2.41.

Vaniea, K. (2019). Questionnaires: Data collectionresearch methods inapplied linguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539-24.

Ward, R. B.,Sadler, P. M.,&Shapiro, I. I. (2007). Learning physicalsciencethrough astronomy activities: A comparison between constructivist and traditional approaches ingrades3-6. Astronomy Education Review, 6(2), 1.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page