|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| Minat pelajar terhadap mata pembelajaran Sains dan Matematik semakin merosot lalu mengakibatkan pelajar menolak tawaran untuk memasuki aliran sains semasa berada di sekolah menengah. Sehubungan dengan itu, kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap sikap dan motivasi berterusan pelajar tingkatan 4 terhadap STEM serta hubungan antaranya. Reka bentuk kajian adalah berbentuk kajian korelasi dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Kajian ini melibatkan 135 pelajar daripada 5 kelas di SMK Seri Samudera sebagai sampel kajian dengan menggunakan teknik persampelan kluster. Instrumen kajian adalah soal selidik yang diadaptasi dari dua instrumen kajian lain. Soal selidik ini mempunyai tiga bahagian dan menggunakan skala Likert 5-mata. Analisis data dijalankan menggunakan statistik deskriptif seperti min dan sisihan piawai serta statistik inferensi, iaitu ujian korelasi Spearman. Kesahan instrumen dilakukan oleh tiga orang pakar dengan nilai kesahan muka adalah 93.33% dan kesahan kandungan adalah 97.96%. Tahap kebolehpercayaan bagi setiap konstruk dalam instrumen kajian ini masing-masing melebihi 0.70 dan boleh digunakan untuk kajian sebenar. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan sikap pelajar terhadap STEM berada pada tahap sederhana tinggi (M=3.87, SD=0.533) dan motivasi berterusan pelajar terhadap STEM turut berapa pada tahap sederhana rendah (M=3.48, SD=0.638). Hubungan antara sikap dan motivasi berterusan pelajar terhadap STEM mempunyai hubungan yang kuat dan signifikan (r=0.582, p |
| References |
Adam, N. A., & Halim, L. (2019). Cabaran pengintegrasian pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum Malaysia. Seuntai Kata, 252. Adelson, J. L., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the mathematical attitudes of elementary students: The effects of a 4-point or 5-point Likert-type scale. Educational and Psychological measurement, 70(5), 796-807. Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239-1258. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 27-58. Akhtar, S., Shah, S. W. A., Rafiq, M., & Khan, A. (2016). Research design and statistical methods in Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (PJMS). Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 32(1), 151. Allen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem-based learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2011(128), 21-29. Altakhyneh, B. H., & Abumusa, M. (2020). Attitudes of University Students towards STEM Approach. International Journal of Technology in Education, 3(1), 39-48. Altunina, V. V., Mychko, E. I., & Pankina, I. Y. (2022). Social attitudes of today’s youth towards receiving engineering education. ........... ..... . ........... Perspectives of Science and Education, 55(1), 492. Ammenwerth, E. (2019). Technology acceptance models in health informatics: TAM and UTAUT. In Applied Interdisciplinary Theory in Health Informatics (pp. 64-71). IOS Press. Andrade, C. (2020). Sample size and its importance in research. Indian journal of psychological medicine, 42(1), 102-103. Ansari, M. M., & Khan, S. (2023). An In-Depth Examination of Validity Assessment: Exploring Diverse Methodologies and Dimensions of Validity in Social Research Studies. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 41(10), 772-782. Astin, A. W. (2014). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. In College student development and academic life (pp. 251-262). Routledge. Attard, C., Berger, N., & Mackenzie, E. (2021, August). The positive influence of inquiry-based learning teacher professional learning and industry partnerships on student engagement with STEM. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 693221). Frontiers Media SA. Aybek, E. C., & Toraman, C. (2022). How many response categories are sufficient for Likert type scales? An empirical study based on the Item Response Theory. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 534-547. Ayuso, A., Merayo, N., Ruiz, I., & Fernández, P. (2022). Challenges of STEM vocations in secondary education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(4), 713-724. Bagozzi, R. P. (1985). Expectancy-value attitude models: An analysis of critical theoretical issues. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2(1), 43-60. Bailey, J. (2004). The validation of a scale to measure school principals' attitudes toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools. Australian Psychologist, 39(1), 76-87. Baldacchino, L., Briguglio, M., & Mangion, M. (2023). Are STEM Students Creative Thinkers?. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), 106-106. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. Baran, E., BILICI, S., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2016). Moving STEM beyond schools: Students' perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 4(1). Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical education, 20(6), 481-486. Benek, I., & Akcay, B. (2019). Development of STEM Attitude Scale for Secondary School Students: Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(1), 32-52. Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224-226. Betz, N. E. (2000). Self-efficacy theory as a basis for career assessment. Journal of career Assessment, 8(3), 205-222. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York: Routledge. Boon Ng, S. (2019). Exploring STEM competences for the 21st century. Boone Jr, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. The Journal of extension, 50(2), 48. Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. Bmj, 328(7451), 1312-1315. Bybee, R. W. (2013). Translating the NGSS for classroom instruction. NSTA Press, National Science Teachers Association. Çakici, S. K., Kol, Ö., & Yaman, S. (2021). The effects of STEM education on students’ academic achievement in science courses: A meta-analysis. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(2), 264-290. Campbell, M. (2004). Two-tailed tests and a statistical significance at 0.05: what do they mean?. Midwifery, 20(2), 142-143. Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical education, 42(12), 1150-1152. Che Lah, F. (2018, Oktober 8). Pendidikan STEM. Harian Metro. https://www.hmetro.com.my/bestari/2018/10/384491/pendidikan-stem Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71-81. Choi, S. W., & Wong, G. T. C. (2016). It's just a standard deviation!. Anaesthesia, 71(8), 969-971. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Christmann, A., & Van Aelst, S. (2006). Robust estimation of Cronbach's alpha. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 97(7), 1660-1674. Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. The American journal of medicine, 119(2), 166-e7. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. Dancey C, & Reidy J. (2004). Statistics Without Maths for Psychology: Using SPSS for Windows. London: Prentice Hall. Darling, H. S. (2022). Do you have a standard way of interpreting the standard deviation? A narrative review. Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment, 5(4), 728-733. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. Demir, C. G., Önal, N. T., & Önal, N. (2021). Investigation of Middle School Students' Attitudes towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education and Determination of the Predictors. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 101-112. Dhall, P. (2019). Quantitative data analysis. In Methodological issues in management research: Advances, challenges, and the way ahead (pp. 109-125). Emerald Publishing Limited. Dhamodharavadhani, S., & Rathipriya, R. (2023). Enhanced regression model using cluster based sampling techniques. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 44(2), 3059-3069. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and instruction, 13(5), 533-568. Dönmez, I., Idin, S., & Gürbüz, S. (2022). Determining Lower-Secondary Students' STEM Motivation: A Profile from Turkey. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(1), 38-51. Du, R. Y. (2010). Research reliability and validity. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. Ealangov, S. (2023). Cabaran dan Strategi Menghadapi Perubahan Kurikulum dalam Kalangan Pensyarah Bidang Agroteknologi Kolej Komuniti: Challenges and Strategies in Curriculum Change among Agrotechnology Lecturers in Community College. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 8(2), 23-36. Emerson, R. W. (2017). Likert scales. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(5), 488-488. Falloon, G., Stevenson, M., Beswick, K., Fraser, S., & Geiger, V. (2021). Building STEM in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 110-122. Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2021). A framework for implementing an engineering-focused STEM curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8), 1523-1541. Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2013). Peranan teknologi maklumat terhadap peningkatan motivasi pembelajaran di kalangan pelajar universiti. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689-1699. Frongillo, E. A., Baranowski, T., Subar, A. F., Tooze, J. A., & Kirkpatrick, S. I. (2019). Establishing validity and cross-context equivalence of measures and indicators. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 119(11), 1817-1830. Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 82(3), 300-329. Gaddis, G. M., & Gaddis, M. L. (1990). Introduction to biostatistics: Part 2, descriptive statistics. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 19(3), 309-315. Gafurova, N. V., Osipova, S. I., Shubkina, O. Y., Kublitskaya, Y. G., & Arnautova, E. A. (2020). Collective subject in implementation of STEM technologies in engineering education. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 79, p. 02006). EDP Sciences. Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195-200. Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Harmon, R. J. (2000). Introduction to inferential statistics and hypothesis testing. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(12), 1568-1570. Hameed, N. M. S. (2023). Pikat pelajar dalami STEM. Pusat Kokurikulum Dan Pembangunan Pelajar UPM. Harbison, L., & Simmons, K. (2024). Fundamentals of Descriptive Statistics. Journal of Dental Hygiene: JDH, 98 (5), 51-54. Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of business research, 57(2), 98-107. Hatisaru, V., Falloon, G., Seen, A., Fraser, S., Powling, M., & Beswick, K. (2023). Educational leaders’ perceptions of STEM education revealed by their drawings and texts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(8), 1437-1457. Hazra, A., & Gogtay, N. (2016). Biostatistics series module 6: correlation and linear regression. Indian journal of dermatology, 61(6), 593-601. Hazzi, O., & Maldaon, I. (2015). A pilot study: Vital methodological issues. Business: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 53-62. Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-based nursing, 18(3), 66-67. Heng, L. K. (2021, March). A STEM Program Designed, Developed and Delivered for Upper Primary School Pupils in Singapore. In 2021 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2019). Student-question-based inquiry in science education. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 1-36. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16, 235-266. Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports medicine, 30, 1-15. Hoque, M., Mohamed, Y., Salaeh, A., & Kadir, K. A. (2020). Students’ attitudes towards educational technology. Mesbahul Hoque, Yuslina Mohamed, Abdulloh Salaeh and Kauthar Abd Kadir, Students’ Attitudes towards Educational Technology, International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(10). Hughes, M. (2012). A survey of faculty and students concerning influence of technology on student motivation in the classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Northwest Missouri State University). Hussain, T., & Akhter, M. (2016). Students' Attitude towards Technology: A Study from Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(1), 17-30. Hussain, U., & Ali, F. (2023). Meaning of P-value. Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat, 13(4), 200-201. Ibe, O. C. (2014). Introduction to Descriptive Statistics. Fundamentals of Applied Probability and Random Processes, 253–274. Ibrahim, M., & Syed, M. A. (2022). Impact of STEM's in the secondary school teaching process. Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 2(1), 23-33. Idris, R., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Exploring STEM education trends in Malaysia: Building a talent pool for Industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 381-393. Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., Nachiappan, S., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Revolutionizing STEM education: Unleashing the potential of STEM interest career in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 1741-1752. In, J. (2017). Introduction of a pilot study. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 70(6), 601. Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A review of science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) education research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 155-163. Jemaah Nazir. (2021). Laporan Kebangsaan Pemeriksaan Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: sample size for pilot studies. Educational and psychological measurement, 70(3), 394-400. Julià, C., & Antolí, J. Ò. (2019). Impact of implementing a long-term STEM-based active learning course on students’ motivation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 303-327. Karpudewan, M., Krishnan, P., Ali, M. N., & Yoon Fah, L. (2022). Designing instrument to measure STEM teaching practices of Malaysian teachers. Plos One, 17(5), e0268509. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020). Laporan tahunan 2019: PPPM 2013-2025. Kero, P., & Lee, D. (2016). Likert is Pronounced" LICK-urt" not" LIE-kurt" and the Data are Ordinal not Interval. Journal of applied measurement, 17(4), 502-509. Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American journal of health-system pharmacy, 65(23), 2276-2284. Kitagawa, T. (2015). A test for instrument validity. Econometrica, 83(5), 2043-2063. Koh, E. T., Owen, W. L., Koh, E. T., & Owen, W. L. (2000). Relationships Among Variables. Introduction to Nutrition and Health Research, 103-126. Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277. Kong, S. F. & Effendi, M. M, E. M. (2020). Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Implementasi Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(3), 72-81 Kong, S. F. & Effendi, M. M, E. M. (2021). Can a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach Enhance Students’ Mathematics Performance?. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010379. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(1), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 Kudaibergenova, K., Abdrakhmanova, K. K., & Umbetkulova, A. (2022). Experience of Turkey in STEM education. Bulletin of Yassavi University, 126(4), 294-304. Kulesa, J., Induru, S., Hubbard, E., & Bhansali, P. (2024). The Conceptual Framework: A Practical Guide. Hospital Pediatrics, 14(11), e503-e508. Laguador, J. M. (2013). Academic problems and negative attitude of engineering students towards Engineering Program. International Journal of Managment, IT and Engineering, 3(7), 495-505. Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: psychology, 8(1), 33267. Lamri, N., Han, C. G. K., & Amatan, M. A. (2023). Pengetahuan Pengajaran & Pembelajaran STEM Dalam Kalangan Guru Sains Di Sekolah Rendah Daerah Telupid / Tongod. Seminar Antarabangsa Pascasiswazah Sains Sosial & Kemanusiaan 2023 Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of educational research, 83(3), 432-479. Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of educational research, 86(3), 681-718. Lee, D. K., In, J., & Lee, S. (2015). Standard deviation and standard error of the mean. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 68(3), 220-223. Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3), 517-528. Lesseig, K., Nelson, T. H., Slavit, D., & Seidel, R. A. (2016). Supporting middle school teachers’ implementation of STEM design challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 116(4), 177-188. Luo, T., Wang, J., Liu, X., & Zhou, J. (2019). Development and application of a scale to measure students’ STEM continuing motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1885-1904. MacRae, A. W. (2019). Descriptive and inferential statistics. In Companion encyclopedia of psychology (pp. 1099-1121). Routledge. Maehr, M. L. (1976). Continuing motivation: An analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 443-462. Martynenko, O. O., Pashanova, O. V., Korzhuev, A. V., Prokopyev, A. I., Sokolova, N. L., & Sokolova, E. G. (2023). Exploring attitudes towards STEM education: A global analysis of university, middle school, and elementary school perspectives. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), em2234. McCombs, B. L. (1984). Processes and skills underlying continuing intrinsic motivation to learn: Toward a definition of motivational skills training interventions. Educational psychologist, 19(4), 199-218. Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2019). The quest for an optimal alpha. PLoS One, 14(1), e0208631. Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of cardiac anaesthesia, 22(1), 67-72. Mogaji, E., Viglia, G., Srivastava, P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). Is it the end of the technology acceptance model in the era of generative artificial intelligence?. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(10), 3324-3339. Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative research: A successful investigation in natural and social sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 9(4), 50-79. Monsen, K. A. (2024). Descriptive Analysis and Interpretation. In Intervention Effectiveness Research: Quality Improvement and Program Evaluation in Healthcare: A Practical Guide to Real-World Implementation (pp. 77-88). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Mutalib, Z. A (2024, Mac 26). Kemerosotan minat pelajar terhadap STEM amat membimbangkan - PM. Berita Harian. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2024/03/1228102/kemerosotan-minat-pelajar-terhadap-stem-amat-membimbangkan-pm Nahler, G., & Nahler, G. (2009). two-tailed test. Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 186-186. Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM education in secondary schools: Teachers’ perspective towards sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(21), 8865. Nguyen, T. T., Hoang, D. L., Nguyen, H. T. L., & Nguyen, T. B. (2021, March). STEM-Oriented activities for improving student performance in Chu Van An secondary school, Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1835, No. 1, p. 012053). IOP Publishing. Nida, N. F., Fauzie, M. M., & Istiqomah, S. H. (2021). Instrumentasi Pemeriksaan Sanitasi Pada Pembuatan Jamu Skala Industri Rumah Tangga. Sanitasi: Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 14(2), 92-99. Noufal, P. (2022). Effectiveness of STEM Approach on Enhancing Critical Thinking Skill of Secondary School Students. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3r ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Ordanovska, O., Romashchenko, K., Tsyna, V., Tsyna, A., & Postova, S. (2023). Implementation of stem education in general education institutions. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 15(40), 119-140. Osman, K., & Saat, R. M. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education in Malaysia. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 10(3), 153-154. Parzi, M. N. (2024, Mei 2). Pembudayaan STEM di sekolah akan diperluas, tingkatkan kemahiran belia - Fadhlina. Berita Harian. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2024/05/1241856/pembudayaan-stem-di-sekolah-akan-diperluas-tingkatkan-kemahiran Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., Jong, T., Riesen, S., Kamp, E., Manoli, C., Zacharia, Z., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. Penaflor-Espinosa, M. J. B. (2020). Attitude towards to and Use of Technology among College Students in a Private University in Republic of Korea. Journal of Next-generation Convergence Information Services Technology, 9(4), 423-436. Pirie, W. (2006). Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Rahman, N. S. A., Zolkifli, Z. F. M., & Ling, Y. L. (2020). Kepentingan kemudahan teknologi dan motivasi membentuk kesedaran pelajar dalam pembelajaran digital. In National Research Innovation Conference (NRICon 2020), Kuching, Sarawak, Oktober. Ramli, N. A. B. M., & Awang, M. B. (2020). Analisis Faktor Risiko Dalam Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Stem Di Sekolah: Aplikasi Teknik Fuzzy Delphi. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 8(1), 1-10. Reddy, P., & Bhadauria, U. S. (2019). Integral elements of a research protocol. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology, 31(2), 167-170. Reid, A. L. (1988). Questionnaires. Medical Journal of Australia, 148(10), 543-544. Roopa, S., & Rani, M. S. (2012). Questionnaire designing for a survey. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(4_suppl1), 273-277. Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Wigfield, A. (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 146-163. Saidin, Z. H., Md Harizan, S. H., & Mohd Hanip, M. F. (2023). Pengaruh Faktor Personaliti dan Teknostres Teknologi Berlebihan terhadap Keberkesanan Gaya Kepimpinan Teknologi. e-BANGI Journal, 20(4). Salkind, N. J. (2010). Content Validity. Encyclopedia of Research Design (pp. 501-503). SAGE Publications. Salloum, S. A., Alhamad, A. Q. M., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE access, 7, 128445-128462. Saputra, A., Anwar, K., & Jamrizal, J. (2024). Nilai, Sikap Dan Kepuasan Kerja Dalam Perilaku Organisasi Pendidikan. MUQADDIMAH: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 2(2), 151-162. Sartika, D. (2019). Pentingnya pendidikan berbasis STEM dalam kurikulum 2013. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 3(3). Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical education, 17(1), 11-16. Schober, P., & Vetter, T. R. (2020). Correlation analysis in medical research. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 130(2), 332. Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768. Scholtes, V. A., Terwee, C. B., & Poolman, R. W. (2011). What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable?. Injury, 42(3), 236-240. Schulze, P. (2009). Methodology of Data Analysis. In Balancing Exploitation and Exploration: Organizational Antecedents and Performance Effects of Innovation Strategies (pp. 78-115). Wiesbaden: Gabler. Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational psychologist, 19(1), 48-58. Sedgwick, P. (2014). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Bmj, 349. Septiyanto, A., Oetomo, D., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2023, January). Analysis of students’ attitudes towards engineering and technology viewed from school area differences. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2540, No. 1). AIP Publishing. Shahravan, A., Ghassemi, A. R., & Baneshi, M. R. (2013). Statistics for dental researcher, Part 2: Descriptive statistics. Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology, 1(2), 53-59. Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Silva, P. (2015). Davis' technology acceptance model (TAM)(1989). Information seeking behavior and technology adoption: Theories and trends, 205-219. Sim, J., & Arnell, P. (1993). Measurement validity in physical therapy research. Physical therapy, 73(2), 102-110. Singh, A. (2021). Significance of research process in research work. Available at SSRN 3815032. Singh, A., Gupta, A., & Peres, K. G. (2019). Writing Quantitative Research Studies. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, 985–997. Souza, A. C. D., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Guirardello, E. D. B. (2017). Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiologia e servicos de saude, 26, 649-659. Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 4. Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of graduate medical education, 5(4), 541-542. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296. Tamir, M., Bigman, Y. E., Rhodes, E., Salerno, J., & Schreier, J. (2015). An expectancy-value model of emotion regulation: implications for motivation, emotional experience, and decision making. Emotion, 15(1), 90. Tate, R., Beauregard, F., Peter, C., & Marotta, L. (2023). Pilot Testing as a Strategy to Develop Interview and Questionnaire Skills for Scholar Practitioners: A Selection of Education Doctorate Students’ Reflective Vignettes. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 8(4), 20-25. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53. Tawang, M. Y., Shari, M. G., & Tan, M. E. M. R. (2021). Penglibatan Aktiviti Kokurikulum Dari Persepsi Pelajar di Politeknik METrO Johor Bahru. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, Teknologi and Sains Sosial (JKTSS), 7(2). Testa, I., Costanzo, G., Crispino, M., Galano, S., Parlati, A., Tarallo, O., ... & Scotti di Uccio, U. (2022). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ engagement and participation in science activities through factor analysis and Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 18-47. Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., Loof, H., Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Velde, D., Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review ofmnstructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383-1395. Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 87-102. Tumeran, T., & Abdullah, M. A. (2024). Tahap Motivasi Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Kejuruteraan. Technical and Vocational Education International Journal (TAVEIJ), 4(1), 103-109. Van der Bijl, J. J., & Shortridge-Baggett, L. M. (2002). The theory and measurement of the self-efficacy construct. Self-efficacy in nursing: Research and measurement perspectives, 15(3), 189-20. Van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard (through 2013), 16(40), 33.Teo, T. (2019). STEM Education Landscape: The Case of Singapore. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012002. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 68-81. Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K–12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects?. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1157-1186. Yadav, S. (2018). Correlation analysis in biological studies. Journal of the Practice of cardiovascular sciences, 4(2), 116-121. Yam, J. H. (2020). Ambiguitas Statistika Deskriptif & Statistika Inferensial. Pelita: Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah, 20(2), 117-124. Yesuf, E. A., Grill, E., Fröschl, G., Haile-Mariam, D., & Koller, D. (2020). Face and content validity of a prospective multidimensional performance instrument for service delivery in district health systems in low-income countries: a Delphi study. International health, 12(3), 184-191. Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1). Zainal, A. Z., & Zainuddin, S. Z. (2020). Technology Adoption in Malaysian Schools: An Analysis of National ICT in Education Policy Initiatives. Digital Education Review, 37, 172-194. Zhao, J., Sun, J., Zhai, Y., Ding, Y., Wu, C., & Hu, M. (2018). A novel clustering-based sampling approach for minimum sample set in big data environment. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 32(02), 1850003. Zhou, S. N., Zeng, H., Xu, S. R., Chen, L. C., & Xiao, H. (2019). Exploring Changes in Primary Students' Attitudes towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) across Genders and Grade Levels. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3), 466-480.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |