UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| Kertas ini melaporkan suatu kajian tentang keberkesanan penggunaan modul kartun dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran biologi tingkatan 4. Suatu metodologi campuran (mixed methodology) digunakan: reka bentuk kajian kuasi eksperimental pra ujian dan pasca ujian melibatkan sejumlah 58 orang pelajar (29 orang pelajar dalam kumpulan eksperimental dan 29 orang pelajar dalam kumpulan kawalan) digunakan untuk menentukan sejauh mana penggunaan modul kartun memberi kesan terhadap pencapaian dalam biologi manakala kaedah temu bual kumpulan fokus (focus group interview) digunakan untuk mendapatkan pandangan pelajar terhadap penggunaan modul kartun dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran biologi. Data kajian dianalisis dengan menggunakan kaedah ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) dan hasil dapatan kajian menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan (F = 1.14, p = .29 > .05) di antara pencapaian biologi bagi kumpulan pelajar yang diajar menggunakan modul kartun berbanding dengan pencapaian biologi kumpulan pelajar yang diajar dengan kaedah konvensional. Dalam pada itu, analisis data temu bual tentang pandangan pelajar terhadap penggunaan modul kartun dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran biologi mendapati terdapat tujuh tema utama yang diutarakan oleh pelajar-pelajar yang menggunakan modul kartun tersebut dan tema-tema tersebut merangkumi aspek pertambahan minat, pengintegrasian bersama buku teks, pengupayaan pelajar, peningkatan prestasi, peranan guru, penjimatan masa, dan peningkatan sikap positif.
Kata kunci: Modul kartun, pendidikan biologi. |
| References |
Abdul Ghani Abdullah, Abd. Rahman Abd Aziz, & Abdul Rashid Mohamed (2007). Humor dalam pengajaran. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications & Distributors.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Razavieh, A., & Sorenson, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education (7th. ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Betsy Tan Lay Hong. (2008). Longman essential biology form 4: Bilingual text. Petaling Jaya, Selangor: Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.
Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research. NY: Longman Press.
Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1989). Using humour to promote learning in the classroom. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 20(1-2), 49-77.
Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd. ed). NJ: Pearson Education International.
Jacobs, D. (2007). More Than Words: Comics as a Means of Teaching Multiple Literacies [Electronic version]. English Journal. Diperoleh Mac 5, 2008 daripada http://proquest.umi.com/
Gan Wan Yeat, Manoharan Subramaniam, & Azmah Rajion. (2005). Biology form 4: Integrated curriculum for secondary schools. Petaling Jaya, Selangor: Bakaprep Sdn. Bhd.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). London: Fontana Press.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Hassard, J. (2005). The art of teaching science: Inquiry and innovation in middle school and high school. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Irwan Fahmi Anuar. (2003). The effectiveness of using comic strips to promote reading comprehension. Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim.
Lowery, L.F. (1967). An experimental investigation into the attitudes of fifth grade students towards science. School Science and Mathematics, 67, 569-579.
Keogh, B., Naylor, S., & Wilson, C. (1998). Concept cartoons: A new perspective on Physics education. Physics Education, 33 (4), 219-224.
Knowles, M.S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago: Follet Publishing Company.
Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2000). Concept cartoons. London, UK: Millgate House Publishing & Consultancy Ltd.
Naylor S., Downing, B., & Keogh B. (2001). An empirical study of argumentation in primary science using Concept Cartoons as the stimulus. Paper presented at the Third International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Naylor, S., Keogh, B., de Boo, M., & Feasey, R. (2001). Formative assessment using concept cartoons: Initial Teacher Training in the UK, in R. Duit (Ed.), Research in Science Education, Past, Present and Future (pp.137-142). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Norihan Abd Ghani. (2005). Kajian keberkesanan pengajaran menggunakan peta konsep bagi subtopik ikatan ion dalam mata pelajaran Kimia Tingkatan 4. Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim.
Novak, J.D. (1990). Concept Maps and Vee Diagrams: Two Metacognitive Tools to Facilitate Meaningful Learning. Learning Science. 19, 29-52.
Nurul Jannah Subahir. (2002). Satu kajian mengenai penggunaan peta konsep dalam tajuk Jadual Berkala di kalangan pelajar Tingkatan 4. Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim.
Osborne, J., Driver, R., & Simon, S. (1998). Attitudes to science: Issues and concerns. School Science Review, 79(288), 27-33.
Riner, P.S. (2000). Successful teaching in the elementary classroom. Prentice Hall: Columbus, Ohio.
Wan Rahmah Wan Mohd. (2003). The effectiveness of using comics in upgrading ESL students’ reading comprehension. Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim.
Wertham, F. (1954). Seduction of the innocent. New York: Rinehart.
Yager, R.E., & Penick, J.E. (1984). What students say about science teaching and science teachers. Science Education, 68(2), 143-152.
Yager, R.E., & Penick, J.E. (1986). Perceptions of four age groups toward science classes, teachers, and the value of science. Science Education, 70(4), 355-363.
Yang, G. (2003). Comics in education. Diperoleh Ogos 26, 2006 daripada http://www.humblecomics.com/comicsedu/index.html |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |