Arbuckle, J.L. (2005). Amos 6.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and
review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin. 84, 888-918.
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl, J.
Beckmann (eds). Action Control: from Cognition to Behavior. New York: Springer
Verlag, 11-39.
Baldwin, T.T., & Ford, J.K. (1988). Transfer of Training: A review and directions for future
research. Personal Psychology. 41, 63–105.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change.
Psychological Review. 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (2001). The changing face of psychology at the dawning of a globalization era.
Canadian Psychology. 42, 12–24.
Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS, EQS and LISREL:
Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument.
International journal of Testing, 1, 55.
Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale:
Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience
with computers. Journal of Educational Computer Research. 26(2), 133-154.
ChanLin, L., Hong, J., Horng, T., Chang, S., & Chu, H. (2006). Factor influencing
technology integration in teaching: A Taiwanese perspective. Innovation in Education
and Teaching International. 43(1), 57-68.
ChanLin, L. H. (2007), Perceived importance and manageability of teachers toward the
factors of integrating computer technology into classrooms. Innovation in Education
and Teaching International. 44(1), 44-55
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of
information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 13 (3), 983-
1003.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction
to Theory and Research. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Goldstein, I.L., & Ford, K.J. (2002). Training in Organizations; Needs assessment,
development and evaluation. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
Gibson, C. (2001). Me and us: differential relationships among goal setting training, efficacy
and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organisational
Behaviour. 22, 789-808.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of
Educational Psychology. 76(4), 503-511.
Hair, J.T., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis
with readings. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Education Inc.
Hayes, A.F., Beyond, B. and Kenny (2009). Statistical mediation analysis in the new
millennium. Communication Monographs. 76, 408 -420.
Hennessy, S, Deaney, R, Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M (2007). Pedagogical strategies
for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science.
Learning, Media and Technology, 3(32), 283-301
Higgins, S, Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive
whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(32), 213-35.
Hong, K.S. & Koh, C.K. (2002). Computer anxiety and attitudes toward computers among
rural secondary schools: A Malaysia perspective. Journal of Research on Technology
in Education. 35(1), 27-48.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1996). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco:
Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New
York: Guilford Press.
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1994). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in
the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 26(2), 220-237.
Murcia, K. (2008a). Teaching for scientific literacy with an interactive whiteboard. Teaching
Science, 54(4), 17 – 21.
Murica, K. (2008b). Teaching science creatively: Engaging primary teacher education
students with interactive whiteboard technology. The International Journal of
Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3(3), 45-52.
Murica, K. & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard
classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 26(4), 417-431.
Noe, R.A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training
effectiveness. Academy of Management Review. 11(4), 736-749.
Phillips, J.J. (1997). Return on investment in training and performance improvement
programs. Houston, TS: Gulf Publishing Company.
Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D., and Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation
hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behaviours research. 42,
185-227.
Preston, C., & Mowbray, L. (2008). Use of SMART Boards for teaching, learning and
assessment in kindergarten science. Teaching Science, 54(2), 50– 53.
Riggs, I.M., & Enochs, L.G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s
science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education. 74(6), 625-637.
Rouiller, J.Z.. & Goldstein, I.L. (1993). The relationship between organizational transfer
climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development quarterly. 4,
377-390.
Segars, A. H. (1997). Assessing the uni-dimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and
illustration within the context of information systems research, Omega, International
Journal of Management Science, 25(1), 107-121.
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business. A Skill Building Approach. (fourth
edition), Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Sugar, W. (2002). Applying human-centred design to technology integration: Three
alternative technology perspectives. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education.
19(1),12 -17.
Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service
teachers. Computers & Education, 52(1), 302-312.
Torkzadeh, R., Pflughoeft, K., & Hall, L. (1999). Computer self-efficacy, training
effectiveness and user attitudes: An empirical study. Behaviour & Information
Technology. 18(4), 299-309.
Tracey, J.B., Hinkin, T.R., Tannenbaum, S.I., & Mathieu, J.E. (2001). The influence of
individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training
outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 12(1), 5-22.
Wilkie, W.L., & Pessemier, E.A.(1973). Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute models.
Journal of Marketing Research. 11, 428–41.