|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| This study aimed to explore sports science student teacher_s (n =100), usage and perceptions of Mosston_s Spectrum of Teaching Styles. The study adopted a qualitative approach of document analyses to investigate the predominant styles used by the student teachers during their teaching practical session in schools. This research, too employed a survey to explore their perceptions about the different teaching styles. The finding revealed 46% student teachers_ lesson predominantly used style B (practice style), followed by 38% style A (command style) especially in teaching fitness topics in their practical teaching session. Findings indicated there were significant differences in perception of using 11 different teaching styles where F(10,1089) = 13.67, p< 0.05, indicated style B was the most perceived teaching style followed by style H (divergent production style) and style F (guided discovery style) among student teachers. Finding indicated only style G (convergent discovery style) was significantly favoured by female student teachers (4.27_1.52) compared to male counterparts (3.81_.82), F(1,98)= 3.91, p 0.05. In conclusion, more effort had to be done in Malaysia to develop more holistic pedagogical styles
Key words: Teaching styles; student teachers; usage and perception of Mosston teaching styles |
| References |
Athos, A.G., & Gabarro, J.J. (1978). Interpersonal behaviors: Communications and understanding in relationships. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Beckett, K. (1990). The effects of two teaching styles on college students achievement of selected physical education outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 153-169.
Byra, M. (2002). A review of Spectrum research. In M. Mosston & S. Ashworth (Eds.). Teaching Physical Education (5th Ed.) (pp. 319-331). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Byra, M. (2006). Teaching styles and in exclusive pedagogies. In D. Kirk, M.O. Sullivan, & Macdonald (Eds.). Handbook of research in physical education (pp. 449- 466), London: Sage Publications.
Boyce, B. A. (1992). The effects of three styles of teaching on university students’ motor performance. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 18, 389-401.
Buck,M.M., Lund, J.M., Harison. & Cook, C.B. (2007). Instructional strategies for secondary school Physical Education: McGrawHill
Cothran, D.,J. & Kulina, P.H. (2008). Teachers’ knowledge about and use of teaching models. The Physical Educator (Fall), 122-129
Cothran, D. J., Kulina, P.H., & Ward, E. (2000). Stuents’ experience with and perceptions of Mosston’s Teaching Styles. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 34, 93-103.
Cothran, D.J., Kulina, P.H., Banville, D., Chooi, E., Amade-Escot, C., MacPhail, A., Macdonald, D., Richard, J.F., Sarmento, P., & Kirl, D. (2005).A cross-cutural investigation of the use of teaching styles.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, Vol. 76(2), 193-201.
Chatoupis, C. (2009). Contributions of the spectrum of teaching styles to research on teaching.Studies in Physical Culture and Tourism, Vol. 16(2), 193-203.
Chatoupis, C., & Emmanuel, C. (2003). Teaching physical education with the Inclusion style: The case of a Greek elementary school. Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 74(8), 33-38
Cruickshank, D.R., Jenkins, D.B., & Metcalf, K.K. (2003). The act of teaching.Boston: McGraw Hill.
Curry, L. (1999). Cognitive and learning styles in medical education. Academic Medicine, 74, 409-413.
Goldberger, M., & Gerney. (1986). Teaching strategies and instructional formats in physical education: Total teaching or ideology. The British Journal of Physical Education, 24(1),5-9.
Goldberger, M., &Howarth, K. (1993).The national curriculum in physical education and the spectrum of teaching styles.The British Journal of Physical Education, 24(1), 23-26.
Dawson, C. (2007). A practical guide to research methods. London: How To Books.
Harison, J. M., Fellingham, G. W., Buck, M. M., & Pellet, T.L. (1995). Effects of practice and command styles on rate of change in volleyball performance and self – efficacy of high, medium, and low skilled learners. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 14, 328-339.
Kulina, P., H. &Cothran, D. J. (2003). Physical education teachers’ self-reported use and perceptions of various teaching styles. Learning and Instruction, 13 , Elsevier, 597-609.
Harison, J.M. (1993). Insructional Strategies for Physical Education, Iowa: Wcb Company Publishers.
Light, R. (2008) Complex Learning Theory: It’s Epistemology and Its assumptions about learning: Implications for Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27 (1), 21-37.
Malaysian Ministry of Education (2002). Integrated Syllabus for Secondary Schools. Curriculum Development Centre: Kuala Lumpur
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Metzler, M. (2000).Instructional models in Physical Education: Allyn & Bacon
Morgan, K. & Kingston.S. (2005). Effects of different teaching styles on the teachersbehaviours that influence motivational limates and pupils’ motivation in physical education. European Physical Physical Education Review, 3, 257-285.
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education. (5th Ed). New York: Benjamin Cummings
Morgan, P.J. & Hansen, V. (2008).Classroom Teachers’ Perceptions of the Impact of Barriers to Teaching Physical Education on the Quality of Physical Education Programs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recration and Dance, Vol.79(4), 506-516
Shuell, T.J. (!996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
X-Cai, S. (1998).Student enjoyment of physical education class in three teaching style environments. Education Chula Vista, 118(3), 412-420.
Zimmerman, B. J (1990). Slf-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |