UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :Article
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :2232-0458 /eISSN 2550-1771
Main Author :Lim, Chong Hin
Additional Authors :
  • Nagendralingan Ratnavadivel
  • Sopia Md Yassin
  • Noor Shah Saad
  • Rajendran Nagappan
  • Idris Md Radzi
Title :The challenge to transform learning: changing teachers’ theory of teaching
Hits :16
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2012
Notes :Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012): Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education (JRPPTTE)
Corporate Name :Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
There is widespread concern in Malaysia about the quality of learning experienced by students, and the approach to learning they develop as a consequence. The approach is generally marked by memorization of information as isolated facts and does not promote understanding or long-term retention of knowledge and information. Despite a number of large-scale, centrally-driven reform efforts to change the status quo, they have for the most part met with little success. Based on the data collected as part of a nation-wide study to investigate the way teachers make pedagogical decisions, this paper argues that one major challenge to transform students_ approach to learning is changing the way teachers think about teaching which past reform efforts have largely ignored. The data suggest that the teachers studied mainly see teaching as transmitting information from teacher to the student. In this view of teaching they hold, they focus their attention on the differences between students to explain differences in learning. Learning is therefore not seen as more a function of what the teacher does than what a student is. This means, unless their view of teaching in challenged, their teaching is unlikely to change to be more responsive and supportive of student learning. The data for this study was collected through qualitative approaches involving interviews and classroom observation. The findings of the study have wide implications in planning professional development courses for teachers to transform the way students learn. Key words: Educational reform; surface learning; deep learning; teacher_s theory of teaching; transforming learning.

References

Biggs, J. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn: Australian

Council for Educational Research.

 

Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (3rd ed.).

Maidenhead, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.

 

Chance, D. (2008, March 18). Will Malaysia‟s New Economic Model Work? Reuters.

 

Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Doing What Matters Most: Investing In Quality Teaching.

New York: National Commission on Teaching and America‟s Future.

 

Dee Fink, L. (2003). Creating Significant Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey

Bass.

 

Entwistle, N. & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom

Helm.

 

Gardner, J. (2006). The Development and Education of the Mind. New York: Routledge.

 

Gow, I. & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of Teaching and Their Relation to Student

Learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20-33.

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2006). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan.

Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

 

Lim, C.H. (2008). What Educational About Mathematics Education? An Observation in

One Malaysian School. Paper presented at the International Conference on

Mathematics Education on 14 – 16 October 2008. Kuala Lumpur.

 

Martön, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On a qualitative differences in learning: I – outcome and

process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.

 

National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A Nation At Risks: The

Imperatives for Educational Reform. Washington, D.C: US Government

Printing.

 

National Economic Advisory Council (2010). New Economic Model for Malaysia. Kuala

Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

 

Nagappan, R., Ratnavadivel, N., Md Yassin, S., Saad, N.S., Mohd Radzi, I, & Lim, C.H.

(2006). Teachers‟ Peadgogical Decision Making Qualities: Transforming

Teaching and Learning. Unpublished research report, Universiti Pendidikan

Sultan Idris.

 

Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The

Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University

press.

 

Ratnavadivel, N. & Lim, C.H. (2010). Curriculum Development and Management:

Practitioner Research and Quality Learning. In Issa, M.S. & Myint, S.K. (Eds.).

Practitioner Research in Teacher Education: Theory and Best Practice.

Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing Group (in press).

 

Ratnavadivel, N., Nagappan, R,. Md Yassin, S., Lim, C.H., Saad, N.S., & Mohd Radzi, I.

(2008). Pedagogical Decision Making as a Basis for Transforming Teaching and

Learning: Practices and Challenges of History Teachers. In John, C.L. & Ling,

P.S. Developing Teachers and Developing Schools in Changing Contexts (pp.

231 – 259). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

 

Shulman, L. (1992). Ways of seeing, ways of knowing, ways of teaching, ways of

learning about teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 393-396.

 

Shulman, L. (1999). Taking Learning Seriously. Change, 31 (4), 10-17.

 

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction To Curriculum Research and Development.

London: Heinemann.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.