Al-Faki, I. M., & Khamis, A. H. A. (2014). Difficulties Facing Teachers in Using
Interactive Whiteboards in Their Classes. American International Journal of
Social Science, 3(2), 136–158.
Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools:
towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and
Education, 13(3), 327-348.
BECTA (British Educational Communications and Technology Agency). (2004). Getting
the most from your interactive whiteboard: A guide for primary schools.
Coventry: BECTA.
BECTA (British Educational Communications and Technology Agency). (2007).
Harnessing technology review 2007: Progress and impact of technology in
education: Summary report.
Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can
interactive whiteboards help? Annual Conference of the Association of
Information Technology for Teacher Education. Trinity College, Dublin.
Retrieved from
http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf
Bell, M.A. (2002). Why use an interactive whiteboard? A baker’s dozen reasons!.
Betcher, C. & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with
Interactive Whiteboards. Melbourne: ACER Press.
Cogill, J. (2002). The use of interactive whiteboards in the pri- mary classroom: what is
effective practice and how does this relate to effective practice in teaching with
ICT? Becta Research Conference 2003: Proving Effective Practice with ICT,
TUC Congress Centre, London.
Cuthell, J. P. (2005). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teaching, learning, and
attainment. Proceedings of SITE 2005. Phoenix, Arizona: AACE.
Damcott, D., Landato J., Marsh, C. & Rainey, W. (2000). Report on the use of the smart
board interactive whiteboard in physical science.
Fisher, S. (2006). Using technology to prepare for future scientist.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: a
literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-169.
Goodison, T. (2002). Learning with ICT at primary level. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 18, 282–2.
Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R. & Tomkins, S. (2005). The pros and cons
of interactive whiteboards in relation to the key Stage 3 strategy and framework.
Language Learning Journal, 32, 38-44.
Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., Dalaaker, D., Egeberg, G., Hatlevik, O. E., & Tømte, K. H.
(2014). Interactive Technology. Traditional Practice? Nordic Journal of Digital
Literacy, (01). Retrieved from
http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2014/01/interactive_technology_traditional_practice
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K. & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical
strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in
school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(32), 283-301.
Higgins, S. E. (2010). „The impact of interactive whiteboards on classroom interaction
and learning in primary schools in the UK.’ In Interactive Whiteboards for
Education: Theory, Research and Practice. Hershey PA: IGI Global. 86-101.
Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G. & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive
whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(3), 213-235.
Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive
whiteboard to preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal
of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351–365.
Jamaludin, Z., Wahab, A. A., Aziz, F. A., Najmy, K., & Rani, A. B. D. (2005). Papan
Putih Maya Interaktif ( IVBoard ): Penilaian Terhadap Interaksi dan Kepuasan
Pengguna, Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat & Multimedia, 2(2005): 33-48.
Kennewell, S. (2001). Interactive whiteboards – yet another solution looking for a
problem to solve? Information Technology in Teacher Education: Autumn 2001
Newsletter, 39, 3–6.
Kulik, J. A. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and
secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say- final report.
Arlington, VA: SRI International.
Lee, M. & Boyle, M. (2003). The Educational Effects and Implications of the Interactive
Whiteboard Strategy of Richardson Primary School. Richardson Primary
School: ACT, Australia.
Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield
schools: a developmental study. University of Sheffield. Retrieved from
http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm
Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. (2013). Preliminary Report. Preschool to Post-
Secondary Education. Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Miller, D. &Glover, D. (2002). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic
change: the experience of five elementary schools in an English education
authority. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 5-19.
Miller, D., Glover, D. & Averis, D. (2004). Motivation: the contribution of interactive
whiteboards to teaching and learning mathematics.
Murcia, K. (2008a). Teaching for scientific characters with an interactive whiteboard.
Teaching Science, 54(4), 17-21.
Murcia, K. (2008b). Teaching science creatively: Engaging primary teacher education
students with interactive whiteboard technology. The International Journal of
Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(3), 45-52.
Murcia. K. & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard
classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 417-431.
Northcote, M., Mildenhall, P., Marshall, L. & Swan, P. (2010). Interactive whiteboards:
Interactive or just whiteboards? Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, 26(4), 494-510.
Pang, F. (2006). Teaching languages with interactive whiteboards. Proceedings of 3rd
National IWB Net Conference.
Pang, F. (2008). Teaching languages with interactive whiteboards. Proceedings of
Workshop. Chinese Language Teachers Association.
Pang, F. (2009). Fourteen ways to inspire your students in a language classroom.
Proceedings of Chinese Language Teachers Conference. Department of
Education and Training. Sydney, NSW.
Pauline, S.C.G., & Wong, K.T. (2015). Exploring the challenges for teacher educator.
The Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education.
5(1), 37-45.
Preston, C. & Mowbrary, L. (2008). Use of SMART Boards for teaching, learning and
assessment in kindergarten science. Teaching Science, 54(2), 50-53.
SMART. (2004). Interactive Whiteboards and Learning: A Review of Classroom Case
Studies and Research Literature.
Smith, H.J. (2001). SmartBoard evaluation: final report. Kent NGfL.
Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive Whiteboards: Boon or
Bandwagon? A Critical Review of the Literature. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 21(2), 91–101.
Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D.G., Kahn, K., Lannin, S & Suchman, L (1987). Beyond
the Chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in
meetings. Communications of the ACM, 30(1), 32.
Swan, K., Schenker, J., & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The Effects of the Use of Interactive
Whiteboards on Student Achievement. Educational Technology, 3290–3297.
Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/28842
Thomas, A. (2002). The white stuff. Times Educational Supplement, 11 October 2002.
Tozcu, A. (2008). The use of interactive whiteboards in teaching non-Roman scripts.
Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 143-166.
Virtual Learning. (2003). Interactive whiteboards case studies: new tools, new
pedagogies, new learning?
Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the
complicated things: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive
whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.
Weiner, M. (2001). The influence of technology such as a SMART Board interactive
whiteboard on student motivation in the classroom.
White, K. (2007). Interactive whiteboard trial, South Western Sydney Region: A report.
Retrieved from http://www.cli.nsw.edu.au/cli/files/interactive_whiteboard_
trial_easiteach.pdf
Wong, K.T., Russo, S., & McDowall, J. (2013). Understanding early childhood student
teachers‟ acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard. Campus-Wide
Information Systems, 30(1), 4–16.
Wong, K. T., Osman, R., & Goh, P.S.C (2012). Effects of determinants for computer use
among teachers in Malaysia. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers
and Teacher Education, 2 (1), 80-88.
Wong, K.T., Siti E. M., Goh, P.S.C., & Hafizul H. (2013). The Computer Use Intention
(CUI) scale in education: Development, validity and reliability studies. The
Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education. 3(1),
47-67.
Wong, K.T., Mohd Sahandri Gani, & Mahizer Hamzah (2015). Factors driving the use of
Moodle: An empirical study on Malaysian practicing teachers‟ perspective The
Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education. 4(2),
15-23.
Xu, H. L., & Moloney, R. (2011). “It Makes the Whole Learning Experience Better”:
Student Feedback on the Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Learning Chinese
at Tertiary Level. Asian Social Science, 7(11), 20–35.
Xu, H.L. and Moloney, R. (2011). Perceptions of interactive whiteboard pedagogy in the
teaching of Chinese language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,
27(2), 307-325.
Yang, K.T., Wang, T. H., & Kao, Y. C. (2012). How an interactive whiteboard impacts a
traditional classroom? Education as Change, 16(2), 313–332.