UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :Article
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :2232-0458 /eISSN 2550-1771
Main Author :Kuan, Nien Tan
Additional Authors :
  • Chia, Ying Lin
  • Tien, Tien Lee
  • Kung, Teck Wong
  • Wee, Hoe Tan
Title :Interactive Whiteboard (IWB): a review of literatures on its affordances and benefits
Hits :1
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2015
Notes :Vol. 5 No. 2 (2015): Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education (JRPPTTE)
Corporate Name :Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
Over hundreds of years of modern education system has been developing and implemented in the schools at European countries and slowly around the world. Not only the education system has changed, but also more and more tools and gadgets had been invented and developed for the sake of better education. In most developing countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and Brunei, Interactive whiteboard (IWB) becomes a strange tool for most new and even experienced teachers. The purpose of this study is to review back the related literature reviews of the effectiveness of the use of IWB for teaching and learning which currently have mixed findings on its contributions as a tool in the classrooms. Thereafter, it believes will lead to the understanding of the use of IWB for teaching Chinese characters. Key words: Interactive whiteboard, Educational technologies, Teaching tools

References

Al-Faki, I. M., & Khamis, A. H. A. (2014). Difficulties Facing Teachers in Using

Interactive Whiteboards in Their Classes. American International Journal of

Social Science, 3(2), 136–158.

 

Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools:

towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and

Education, 13(3), 327-348.

 

BECTA (British Educational Communications and Technology Agency). (2004). Getting

the most from your interactive whiteboard: A guide for primary schools.

Coventry: BECTA.

 

BECTA (British Educational Communications and Technology Agency). (2007).

Harnessing technology review 2007: Progress and impact of technology in

education: Summary report.

 

Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can

interactive whiteboards help? Annual Conference of the Association of

Information Technology for Teacher Education. Trinity College, Dublin.

Retrieved from

http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf

 

Bell, M.A. (2002). Why use an interactive whiteboard? A baker’s dozen reasons!.

 

Betcher, C. & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with

Interactive Whiteboards. Melbourne: ACER Press.

 

Cogill, J. (2002). The use of interactive whiteboards in the pri- mary classroom: what is

effective practice and how does this relate to effective practice in teaching with

ICT? Becta Research Conference 2003: Proving Effective Practice with ICT,

TUC Congress Centre, London.

 

Cuthell, J. P. (2005). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teaching, learning, and

attainment. Proceedings of SITE 2005. Phoenix, Arizona: AACE.

 

Damcott, D., Landato J., Marsh, C. & Rainey, W. (2000). Report on the use of the smart

board interactive whiteboard in physical science.

 

Fisher, S. (2006). Using technology to prepare for future scientist.

 

Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: a

literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-169.

 

Goodison, T. (2002). Learning with ICT at primary level. Journal of Computer Assisted

Learning, 18, 282–2.

 

Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilkington, R. & Tomkins, S. (2005). The pros and cons

of interactive whiteboards in relation to the key Stage 3 strategy and framework.

Language Learning Journal, 32, 38-44.

 

Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., Dalaaker, D., Egeberg, G., Hatlevik, O. E., & Tømte, K. H.

(2014). Interactive Technology. Traditional Practice? Nordic Journal of Digital

Literacy, (01). Retrieved from

http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2014/01/interactive_technology_traditional_practice

 

Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K. & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical

strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in

school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(32), 283-301.

 

Higgins, S. E. (2010). „The impact of interactive whiteboards on classroom interaction

and learning in primary schools in the UK.’ In Interactive Whiteboards for

Education: Theory, Research and Practice. Hershey PA: IGI Global. 86-101.

 

Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G. & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive

whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(3), 213-235.

 

Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive

whiteboard to preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal

of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351–365.

 

Jamaludin, Z., Wahab, A. A., Aziz, F. A., Najmy, K., & Rani, A. B. D. (2005). Papan

Putih Maya Interaktif ( IVBoard ): Penilaian Terhadap Interaksi dan Kepuasan

Pengguna, Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat & Multimedia, 2(2005): 33-48.

 

Kennewell, S. (2001). Interactive whiteboards – yet another solution looking for a

problem to solve? Information Technology in Teacher Education: Autumn 2001

Newsletter, 39, 3–6.

 

Kulik, J. A. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and

secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say- final report.

Arlington, VA: SRI International.

 

Lee, M. & Boyle, M. (2003). The Educational Effects and Implications of the Interactive

Whiteboard Strategy of Richardson Primary School. Richardson Primary

School: ACT, Australia.

 

Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield

schools: a developmental study. University of Sheffield. Retrieved from

http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm

 

Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. (2013). Preliminary Report. Preschool to Post-

Secondary Education. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

 

Miller, D. &Glover, D. (2002). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic

change: the experience of five elementary schools in an English education

authority. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 5-19.

 

Miller, D., Glover, D. & Averis, D. (2004). Motivation: the contribution of interactive

whiteboards to teaching and learning mathematics.

 

Murcia, K. (2008a). Teaching for scientific characters with an interactive whiteboard.

Teaching Science, 54(4), 17-21.

 

Murcia, K. (2008b). Teaching science creatively: Engaging primary teacher education

students with interactive whiteboard technology. The International Journal of

Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(3), 45-52.

 

Murcia. K. & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard

classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 417-431.

 

Northcote, M., Mildenhall, P., Marshall, L. & Swan, P. (2010). Interactive whiteboards:

Interactive or just whiteboards? Australasian Journal of Educational

Technology, 26(4), 494-510.

 

Pang, F. (2006). Teaching languages with interactive whiteboards. Proceedings of 3rd

National IWB Net Conference.

 

Pang, F. (2008). Teaching languages with interactive whiteboards. Proceedings of

Workshop. Chinese Language Teachers Association.

 

Pang, F. (2009). Fourteen ways to inspire your students in a language classroom.

Proceedings of Chinese Language Teachers Conference. Department of

Education and Training. Sydney, NSW.

 

Pauline, S.C.G., & Wong, K.T. (2015). Exploring the challenges for teacher educator.

The Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education.

5(1), 37-45.

 

Preston, C. & Mowbrary, L. (2008). Use of SMART Boards for teaching, learning and

assessment in kindergarten science. Teaching Science, 54(2), 50-53.

 

SMART. (2004). Interactive Whiteboards and Learning: A Review of Classroom Case

Studies and Research Literature.

 

Smith, H.J. (2001). SmartBoard evaluation: final report. Kent NGfL.

 

Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive Whiteboards: Boon or

Bandwagon? A Critical Review of the Literature. Journal of Computer Assisted

Learning, 21(2), 91–101.

 

Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D.G., Kahn, K., Lannin, S & Suchman, L (1987). Beyond

the Chalkboard: Computer support for collaboration and problem solving in

meetings. Communications of the ACM, 30(1), 32.

 

Swan, K., Schenker, J., & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The Effects of the Use of Interactive

Whiteboards on Student Achievement. Educational Technology, 3290–3297.

Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/28842

 

Thomas, A. (2002). The white stuff. Times Educational Supplement, 11 October 2002.

 

Tozcu, A. (2008). The use of interactive whiteboards in teaching non-Roman scripts.

Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 143-166.

 

Virtual Learning. (2003). Interactive whiteboards case studies: new tools, new

pedagogies, new learning?

 

Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the

complicated things: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive

whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.

 

Weiner, M. (2001). The influence of technology such as a SMART Board interactive

whiteboard on student motivation in the classroom.

 

White, K. (2007). Interactive whiteboard trial, South Western Sydney Region: A report.

Retrieved from http://www.cli.nsw.edu.au/cli/files/interactive_whiteboard_

trial_easiteach.pdf

 

Wong, K.T., Russo, S., & McDowall, J. (2013). Understanding early childhood student

teachers‟ acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard. Campus-Wide

Information Systems, 30(1), 4–16.

 

Wong, K. T., Osman, R., & Goh, P.S.C (2012). Effects of determinants for computer use

among teachers in Malaysia. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers

and Teacher Education, 2 (1), 80-88.

 

Wong, K.T., Siti E. M., Goh, P.S.C., & Hafizul H. (2013). The Computer Use Intention

(CUI) scale in education: Development, validity and reliability studies. The

Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education. 3(1),

47-67.

 

Wong, K.T., Mohd Sahandri Gani, & Mahizer Hamzah (2015). Factors driving the use of

Moodle: An empirical study on Malaysian practicing teachers‟ perspective The

Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education. 4(2),

15-23.

 

Xu, H. L., & Moloney, R. (2011). “It Makes the Whole Learning Experience Better”:

Student Feedback on the Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Learning Chinese

at Tertiary Level. Asian Social Science, 7(11), 20–35.

 

Xu, H.L. and Moloney, R. (2011). Perceptions of interactive whiteboard pedagogy in the

teaching of Chinese language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,

27(2), 307-325.

 

Yang, K.T., Wang, T. H., & Kao, Y. C. (2012). How an interactive whiteboard impacts a

traditional classroom? Education as Change, 16(2), 313–332.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.