|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| This aim of this study is to examine the impact of on-screen text on the learning performance of grammar learning of Bahasa Malaysia involving a group of primary schoolers. In addition, learners_ characteristics such as motivation and gender were also examined in this study. It was hypothesized that learners who had received redundant text explanation and animation would perform worse on memory and problem solving test. Results showed that the redundancy learning mode that integrates animation, sound narration and on-screen text in a computer-based environment helped improve students_ performance. This finding suggests that on-screen text could reduce cognitive load and enhance learning process, which leads to better performance.
Keywords redundancy principle, modality principle, animation, multimedia instruction. |
| References |
Adegoke, B. A. (2010). Integrating animations, narratives and textual information for improving Physics learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(2), pp. 725-748.
Astleitner, H., & Keller, M. (2006). An aptitude-treatment-interaction-approach on motivation and student’s self-regulated multimedia based-learning. Interactive Educational Multimedia (13), pp. 11-23.
Berk, L. E. (2005). Infants, children, and adolescents. Fifth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bobis, J., Sweller, J., & Cooper, M. (1993). Cognitive load effects in primary school geometry task. Learning and Instruction, 3, pp. 1-21.
Butler, D. (2000). Gender, girls, and computer technology: What’s the status now? The Clearing House, 73(4), pp. 225-229.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction: Cognition and Instruction, 8, pp. 293-332.
Chanlin, L. (1999). Gender differences and the need for visual control. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), pp. 329-335.
Chanlin, L., & Chuang, A. (2001). The effects of gender and presentation format in computer-based learning. Education Media International, 38 (1), pp. 61-65.
Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2008). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines consumers and designers of Multimedia Learning. Second Edition. Place: Publisher
Diao, Y., & Sweller, J. (2007). Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations. Learning and Instruction, 17 (1), pp. 78-88.
Halpern, D. F. (2004). A cognitive process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, pp. 135-139
Herlitz, A., Nelsson, L.G., & Backman, L. (1997). Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory and Cognition, 25, pp. 801-811.
Jones, L., & Plass, J. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86 (4), pp. 546-561.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, pp. 126-136.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivation design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 383-434.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10 (3), pp. 2-10.
Lewandowski, L. J., & Kobus, D. A. (1993). The effects of redundancy in bimodal word processing. Human Performance, 6(3), pp. 229-239.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). The promise of multimedia learning: what is multimedia instruction. Multimedia Learning, Second Edition, pp. 4-5. Sorry it is a book or journal article; if it is a book kindly write down the place and publisher.
Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45 (1), pp. 5-17.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1892), Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: when reading helps listening, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94, No.1, 2002, pp. 156-163.In J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp .68–73). Oxford: Clarendon.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principle of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (2), pp. 358-368,.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), pp. 255-287.
Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17(4), pp. 398-422.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). A process-oriented view of student motivation and cognition. In J. Stark & L. Mets (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning through research: New direction for instructional research, 57, pp. 65-79. San Francisco: Josey- Bass.
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E. & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), pp. 25-36.
Seong Chong Toh, Waddah Ahmed Saleh Munassar, & Wan Ahmad Jaafar Wan Yahaya (2010). Redundancy effect in multimedia learning: a closer look. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings Ascilite Sydney 2010, pp. 988-998.
Tan, U., Okuyan, M., Bayraktar, T., & Akgun, A. (2002). Sex difference in perceptualverbal ability in relation to body size. (112, pp. 953-995), International Journal of Neuroscience.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |