Andersen, L. (2014). Visual-spatial ability: Important in STEM, ignored in gifted

education. Roeper Review, pp. 114-121. doi:10.1080/02783193.2014.884198.

 

Bodner, G.M. & Guay, R.B. (1997). The purdue visualization of rotation test. The

Chemical Educator, 2 (4), pp. 1-17.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method

approaches. California: SAGE Publications. Inc.

 

Deratzou, S. (2006). A qualitative inquiry into the effect of visualisation on high school

Chemistry Student’s Learning Process of Molecular Structure. Disertasi Doktor

Falsafah tidak diterbitkan. Drexel University.

 

Dow, W. (2006). The need to change pedagogies in science and technology subjects:

A European perspective. International Journal Technolology Design Education,16 (3),

pp. 307–321.

 

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: Theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic

Book.

 

Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science

education. Dalam J.K Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M.Nakhleh. (Eds.). Visualization: Theory

and Practice in Science Education. Netherland: Springer, pp. 3–24.

 

Gog, T. & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and

social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review. 22(2), 155–

174. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9134-7.

 

Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Spatial abilities, working memory and

mechanical reasoning. Dalam J. Gero & B. Tversky (Eds.). Visual and Spatial

Reasoning in Design. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney, pp. 221–241.

 

Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. Dalam

P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Visual Spatial Thinking.

Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–169.

 

Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2009). How spatial

abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, Dental Education. Learning and Individual

Differences. 19(1), pp. 61–70. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.006.

 

Höffler, T. N. (2010). Spatial ability: Its influence on learning with visualizations: A

meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review. 22(3), pp. 245–269. doi:10.1007/

s10648-010-9126-7.

 

Höffler, T. N. & Leutner, D. (2011). Computers in human behavior the role of

spatial ability in learning from instructional animations: Evidence for an abilityas-

compensator hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior. 27, pp. 209–216.

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.042.

 

Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. pp.

392–404.

 

Jang, S., Black, J. B., & Jyung, R. W. (n.d.). Embodied cognition and virtual reality in

learning to visualize anatomy. Research Design and Questions. pp. 2326–2331.

 

Kaufman, S. B. (2006). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization

ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity?

Intelligence. 35 (3), pp. 211-223.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia

2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Lee, E. A. L. & Wong, K. W. (2014). Learning with desktop virtual eeality: Low spatial

ability learners are more positively affected. Computers and Education. 79, pp. 49–

58. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.010.

 

Lee, E. A., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2009). Educational values of virtual reality: The case

of spatial ability. pp. 991–995.

 

Liner, M, S. (2012). Spatial ability and achievement in high school physics.

 

Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words?

Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational

Psychology. 86, pp. 389-401.

 

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Dalam R.E. Mayer, (Eds.).

The Cambrige Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University

Press, pp. 31-48.

 

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Edisi

Pertama.

 

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Edisi

Kedua.

 

Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and

instruction. 29, pp. 171–173. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003.

 

Mayer, R. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia

learning. Educational Psychologist. 38(1), pp. 43–52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.

 

McMahon, G. P. (2007). Getting hots with what’s in the box: Developing high order

thinking skills within a technology-rich learning environment. Disertasi Doktor

Falsafah tidak diterbitkan. Curtin University of Technology.

 

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., Kwok, O., Cifuentes, L., &

Davis, T. J. (2012). The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual

reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: A structural equation

modeling analysis. Computers & Education. 59(2), pp. 551–568. doi:10.1016/j.

compedu.2012.02.004.

 

Mnguni, L. E. (2014). The theoretical cognitive process of visualization for science

education. Springe Plus, 3(1), pp. 184. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-184.

 

Paas, F., Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations,

specifications and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review.

22(2), pp. 115–121. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9133-8.

 

Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in

multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction. 29, pp. 125–127. doi:10.1016/j.

learninstruc.2013.05.005.

 

Rapp, D. N. & Kurby, C.A. (2008). The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of learning: Internal

representations and external visualizations. Dalam J.K Gilbert, M. Reiner & M.

Nakhleh (Eds.). Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. Netherland:

Springer, pp. 29–52.

 

Spanjers, I. a. E., Gog, T., & Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). A theoretical analysis of how

segmentation of dynamic visualizations optimizes students’ learning. Educational

Psychology Review. 22(4), pp. 411–423. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6.

 

Stieff, M. & Uttal, D. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement?

Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9304-8.

 

Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane

cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review. 22(2), pp. 123–138. doi:10.1007/

s10648-010-9128-5.

 

Yang. E., Andre, T., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of

visualization on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education.

25(3), pp. 329-349.

 

Wang, H. (2007). The comparative efficacy of 2D-versus 3D-based media design for

influencing spatial Visualization Skills. Computers in Human Behavior. 23, pp. 1943–

1957. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.004.

 

Wilkinson, D. (2004). Effects of prior knowledge and spatial ability on learning outcomes and

cognitive load associated with rich and lean multimedia presentation. Disertasi Doktor

Falsafah tidak diterbitkan. The University of Kansas, Kansas.