Al-Amir, S. (2009). Computer based testing vs. paper based testing: Establishing the comparability of reading tests
through the revolution of a new comparability model in a Saudi EFL context. Unpublished thesis submitted for
the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics. University of Essex (UK).
Anakwe, B. (2008). Comparison of student performance in paper-based versus computer-based testing. Journal of
Education for Business, September/October, 13-17.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2000). Language Testing in Practice. (3rded.). Oxford University Press. UK.
Bugbee, A., & Brent, F. (1990). Testing by computers: Findings in six years of use 1982-1988. Journal of Research
on Computing in Education, 23(1), 87-100.
Chapelle, C. A., & Douglas, D. (2006). Assessing language through computer technology. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Chapelle, C. (2007). Technology and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 27, 98-
114.
Choi, I., Kim, K., & Boo, J. (2003). Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language
test. Language Testing, 20(3), 295-320.
Chua, Y. P. (2012).Effects of computer-based testing on test performance and testingmotivation. Computers in
Human Behaviour.28(5), 1580-1586.
Clariana, R., & Wallace, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the
test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology.33(5) 593-602.
Cohen, A. D. (1994). Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom. Second edition. New York: Harper and Row,
Publishers.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.
MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
Davies, A., & Elder, C. (2004). The Handbook of Applied Linguistic. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Eagly, A. H., & Shelly C. (1998). “Attitude Structure and Function”. In D.T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fisk, and G. Lindsey
(eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 269–322). New York: McGowan-Hill.
Earl, L. M. (Ed.). (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Fan J. (2014). Chinese test takers’ attitudes towards the VersantEnglish Test: a mixed-methods approach.
Language Testing in Asia, 4(6), 1-17.
Flowers, C., Do-Hong, K., Lewis, P., & Davis, V. C. (2011). A comparison of computer-based testing and penciland-
paper testing for students with a read- aloud accommodation. Journal of Special Education Technology,
26(1), 1-12.
Gardner, R. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitude &
Motivation. London: EdwardArnold.
Harde, P. L., Crowson, H. M., Xie, K., & Ly, C. (2007). Testing differential effects of computer-based, web-based,
and paper-based administration of questionnaire research instruments. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 30(1), 5-22.
Higgins, J., Russell, M., & Hoffmann, T. (2005). Examining the Effect of Computer-Based Passage Presentation on
Reading Test Performance. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(4), pp. 5-34.
Honaker, L. (1988). The equivalence of computerised and conventional MMPI administration: A critical review.
Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 561-77.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, M., &Pu, H. (2010). Comparison between CBT and PBT: assessment of gap-filling and multiple-choice cloze in
reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 935-941.
Loyd, B. H., &Gressard, C. (1985). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
Maguire, K. A., Smith, D. A., Brallier, S. A., & Palm, L. J. (2010). Computer-based testing: A comparison of
computer-based and paper-and-pencil assessment. Academy of Educational Leadership, 14(4), 117-125.
McDonald, A. (2002). The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-andpencil
educational assessments. Computers & Education, 39, 299-312.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.) Educational Measurement (3rd ed.). London: Collier Macmillan
Publishers.
Mojarrad, H., Hemmati, F., JafariGohar, M., and Sadeghi, A. (2013). Computer-based assessment (CBA) Vs.
paper/pencil-based assessment (PPBA): An investigation into the performance and attitude of Iranian EFL
learners' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistic World.
4(4),418-428.
Noyes, J. M., Garland, K. J., & Robbins, L. (2004). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Is workload
another test mode effect. British Journal ofEducational Technology, 35(1), 111-13.
Paek, P. (2005). Recent trends in comparability studies. Pearson Educational Measurement Research Reports.
Research Report 05-05. Pearson Educational Measurement. USA.
Pomplun, M., Frey, S., & Becker, D. (2002). The score equivalence of paper- and-pencil and computerized versions
of a speeded test of reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 337- 354.
Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., &Nordin, Z. S. (2005).Computer self-eeficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes
toward the internet: A study among undergraduates in UNIMAS. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4), 205-
219.
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of conventional and computerized tests of reading in a second language.
Language Learning & Technology.5(2), 38-59
Shohamy, E. (2001).The Power of Tests – A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. Edinburgh:
Pearson Education Ltd.
Tanner, D. E. (2001). Authentic assessment: A solution, or part of the problem. High School Journal, 85(1), 6-13.
Ward, T., Hooper, S., &Hannafin, K. (1989). The effects of computerized tests on the performance and attitudes of
college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 327-333.
Way, W. D., Davis, L. L., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2006). Score comparability of online and paper administrations of the
Texas assessment of knowledge and skills. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on
Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
Available at http://www.pearsonedmeasurement.com/downloads/research/RR_06_01.pdf.
Yurdabakan, I., &Uzunkavak, C. (2012). Primary school students’ attitudes towards computer based testing and
assessment in turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 177-188.