UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| The purpose of the study was to develop and validate an assessment practice inventory for teacher educators adapted from Zhang and Burry-Stock (1994, copyright 2003) to be used to evaluate assessment practice among teacher educators. The initial instrument contained 70 items (excluding background information) that were divided into three important sections _ practice related to assessment literacy standards (Section B); belief about assessment principles (Section C); and frequency of carrying out described items (Section D). The instrument was administered to 254 teacher educators from a teacher education university and a teacher training institute. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and reliability tests were performed on the data. Results showed that the instrument developed yielded high values of internal consistency as reflected by the Cronbach alpha values. Results of EFA suggest that 21 items need to be removed due to their non-dimensionality as they have more or less equal loadings on several factors. Thus, the final draft of the instrument contained 49 items. Even though the reliability and validity of the instrument are within the acceptable range, more data need to be gathered using bigger sample size so that further analysis using Item Response Theory can be used to explore deeper into the psychometric characteristics of the items before the instrument can be finalized. |
| References |
Alexander W. Astin, Trudy W. Banta, K. Patricia Cross, Elaine El-Khawas, Peter T. Ewell, Pat Hutchings, Theodore J. Marchese, Kay M. McClenney, Marcia Mentkowski, Margaret A. Miller, E. Thomas Moran, Barbara D. Wright. (2003). 9 principles of good practice for assessing student learning. American Association for Higher Education (AAHE) Assessment Forum.
American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, National Education Association. (2009). Assessment Literacy Standard.
Betts, J. R., Rueben, K. S., & Danenberg, A. (2000). Equal resources, equal outcomes? The distribution of school resources and student achievement in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1).
Gardner, H. (2013). Five minds for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 20, 20-32.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post- Secondary Education). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning (CSE Tech. Report 517). Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
Suah See Ling, Ong Saw Lan & Shuki Osman. (2009). Pentaksiran Pembelajaran Pelajar: Amalan Guru-guru di Malaysia. Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Malaysia, 5(6).
Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers' self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323-342. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |