UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :Article
Subject :BF Psychology
ISSN :eISSN 2821-2916
Main Author :Reny Yuniasanti
Additional Authors :
  • Nurul Ain Hidayah Abas
Title :Translation and adaptation culture: experience workplace incivility scale in Indonesia
Hits :2
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional
Year of Publication :2019
Notes :Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning (AJATeL)
Corporate Name :Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
PDF Full Text :You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun
In disruptive need to create healthy workplace in organization, in other side, 98% employee experienced workplace incivility. Most of experienced workplace incivility instrument is developed and validated in English, and has not been much studied about experience workplace incivility instrument adapted from English to Indonesia. Hence, the research aims to cross-culturally adapt the Workplace Incivility Scale. The process of the translation and culture adaption is referred to the guidelines for the cross cultural adaptation process, as suggested by Beaton, consisting of 6 stages. The first stage is forward translation, second stage is synthesis, third stage is back translation, the fourth stage is expert committee review, the fifth stage is pilot-test, and sixth stage is submission and appraisal of all written reports by developer_s/committee. Translation is conducted using two independent translators, two language native translators, expert committee review that consisted of four expert professional judgments at psychological field, one expert methodologist, and one expert language professional. Respondent questionnaire is used to analyse the results of pilot study on 46 employees. A validity item as a result of fifth stage is the correlation between item and total item range from 0.519 until 0.864. The item was analysed quantitatively using SPSS, and the result of the reliability with Cronbach_s Alpha is 0.861 indicating higher reliability. Based on the results of quantitative analysis of the test data, the items met the criteria of item validity and reliability. Significantly, the measuring tool can be used in the assessment employees for increasing health workplace and their performance. Keywords: translation, cultural adaptation, assessment, experienced workplace incivility scale, Indonesia

References

Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Effect of Tit for Tat ? the Spiraling in the Workplace Incivility.

Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/259136

 

Azwar, S. (2017). Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

 

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of crosscultural

adaptation of self-report measures, 25(24), 3186–3191.

 

Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013). Selective incivility as

modern discrimination in organizations: Evidence and Impact. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1579–

1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311418835

 

Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Magley, V. J., & Nelson, K. (2017). Researching rudeness: The past, present,

and future of the science of incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 299–313.

https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000089

 

Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace :

Incident and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64–80.

 

DuBay, M., & Watson, L. R. (2019). Translation and cultural adaptation of parent-report developmental

assessments: Improving rigor in methodology. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 62(February),

55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.02.005

 

Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of

questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435–441.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021

 

Estes, B., & Wang, J. (2008). Integrative literature review: Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and

organizational performance. Human Resource Development Review, 7(2), 218–240.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484308315565

 

Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, J. R. M., & Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments:

language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(13),

1–10.

 

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursing,

18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129

 

Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). Incivility, social undermining, bullying...oh my!’’: A call to reconcile constructs

within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 499–519.

https://doi.org/10.1002/job

 

Kasali, R. (2017). Disruption. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

 

Kent, S., & Muurlink, O. (2014). Getting a grip on why incivility happens within the workplace: A

commentary essay. Social Justice Research, 27(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-

0207-5

 

Leiter, M. (2013). Analyzing and theorizing the dynamics of the workplace incivility crisis. Netherlands:

Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5571-0

 

Luntungan, I., Hubeis, A. V. S., Sunarti, E., & Maulana, A. (2014). The embryonic challenge from gen Y

calling for s.o.s in banking industry: A call for action for hr practitioner in Indonesia. International

Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 24(1), 45–51.

 

Maki, D., Rajab, E., Watson, P. J., & Critchley, D. J. (2017). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and

psychometric properties of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire in Modern Standard Arabic. Disability and

Rehabilitation, 39(3), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1140832

 

McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability,

and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1),

28–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366253

 

McNeish, D. (2017). Thanks Coefficient Alpha , We ’ ll Take it From Here. Psychological Methods,

(February), 19–57.

 

Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the Validity and

Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014),

164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129

 

P.Leiter, M., Peck, E., & Gumuchian, S. (2015). Mistreatment in Organizations Article information :

Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, 13, 107–135.

 

Paulin, D., & Griffin, B. (2016). The relationships between incivility, team climate for incivility and jobrelated

employee well-being: a multilevel analysis. Work & Stress, 8373(August), 1–20.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2016.1173124

 

Pearson, C., & Porath, C. (2009). The Cost of Bad Behavior : How Incivility Is Damaging Your Business

and What. New York: Penguin.

 

Perneger, T. V., Leplège, A., & Etter, J.-F. (2002). Cross-Cultural Adaptation of a Psychometric Instrument.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(11), 1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00088-

8

 

Peters, G. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity comprehensive assessment

of scale quality. The European Health Psychologist, 1(2), 56–69.

 

Porath, C., & Pearson, C. (2013). The Price of Incivility, 15(January), 1–17.

 

Rachmayani, Dita & Ramdhani, N. (2017). Adaptasi Bahasa dan Budaya Skala Psychological Well-Being.

Conference: Seminar Nasional Psikometri. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakar..

 

Rahim, A., & Cosby, D. M. (2016). A model of workplace incivility, job burnout, turnover intentions, and

job performance. Journal of Management Development, 35(10), 1255–1265.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2015-0138

 

Rahman, A., Iqbal, Z., Waheed, W., & Hussain, N. (2003). Translation and cultural adaptation of health

questionnaires. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 53(4), 142–7. Retrieved from

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12776898

 

Rowley, J. (2014). Designing and using research questionnaires. Management Research Review, 37(3), 308–

330. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2013-0027

 

Schilpzand, P., Pater, I. E. De, & Erez, A. (2014). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and

agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(S1), S57–S88.

https://doi.org/10.1002/job

 

Sguera, F., Bagozzi, R. P., Huy, Q. N., Boss, R. W., & Boss, D. S. (2016). Curtailing the harmful effects of

workplace incivility: The role of structural demands and organization-provided resources. Journal of

Vocational Behavior, 95–96, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.08.004

 

Smidt, O., De, B. L. T., Lizelle, B., & Leiter Michael P. (2016). The validation of a workplace incivility

scale within the South African banking industry. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 42(1), 1–12.

 

Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation , adaptation and validation of instruments or scales

for use in cross-cultural health care research : A clear and user-friendly guideline scales for use in

cross-cultural health care research : Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(December), 268-

274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x

 

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabet.

 

Tsuno, K., Kawakami, N., Shimazu, A., Shimada, K., Inoue, A., & Leiter, M. P. (2017). Workplace incivility

in Japan: Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the modified Work Incivility Scale. Journal

of Occupational Health, 59(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.16-0196-OA

 

Vagharseyyedin, A. S. (2015). Workplace incivility: a concept analysis. Contemporary Nurse, 50(1), 115–

125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2015.1010262

 

Warsini, S., Buettner, P., Mills, J., West, C., & Usher, K. (2014). Translation, cultural adaptation, and

psychometric testing of the environmental distress scale with indonesian survivors of a volcanic

eruption. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 8(3), 229–238.

https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2014.45

 

Zhou, Z. (2014). Effects of Workplace Incivility on Nurses’ Emotions, Well-being, and Behaviors: A

Longitudinal Study. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Vol. 75). Retrieved from

http://sfx.scholarsportal.info/guelph/docview/1614193152?accountid=11233%5Cnhttp://sfx.scholars

portal.info/guelph?url_ver=Z39.88-

2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+&+theses&sid=ProQ:Pro

Quest+Dissertations+&+Theses+A&. Access date at 14 January 2017.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.