|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| Design and Technology (RBT) is one of the newest subjects which is given to Living Skills_s (KHB_s) teachers as a priority to teach the students. However, the teachers are less skills in pedagogical content to teach students in creative ways and lack of contents in electronic design topic. The development of module has not yet to discover the visualisation effect of students in electronic design topic. This study was aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of Multi-Electronic-MagnetDuino module with Augmented Reality (AR) application in electronic design topic towards academic achievement among secondary school students. The development of the module is based on ADDIE Model with quantitative research design approach. The semistructured interview is conducted with 5 experts to find the needs of electronic design during analysis phase. The module was designed in design phase where the module and application were designed based on need analysis and theories such as Cognitivism, Behaviourism, Multisensory Learning, Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, and Flipped Classroom. The validation process is conducted in development phase where the module and test instrument were validated by 9 experts while the application was validated by 3 experts. The data were analysed by Content Validity Index (CVI) approach. The pilot study is conducted during implementation phase with 30 sample of students which shows 0.709 reliability value for test instrument. This shows that the test instrument can be used in evaluation phase due to its consistency. A Quasexperimental approaches were used in the study with 54 form two RBT students from one of the schools in Batang Padang district. The samples were divided into 26 students for control group and 28 students for experimental group. Three research instruments were employed which are Multi-Electronic-MagnetDuino Module, Multi-Electronic- MagnetDuino application, and test instrument. The data were analysed to explain the differences of students_ mean academic achievement between control and experimental group. The findings showed that there was an improvement of students_ mean academic achievement for both control group (M=10.50) and experimental group (M=13.57) which shows there is significant differences of students_ mean academic achievement (p |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |