Mejia-Mercado, E.L., and Romero-Gonzalez, Z. (2021). Pedagogical models and their application to
pedagogical strategies for citizenship education. Perspectivas. 7(1), 56-65.
Flick, L. B. (1996). Understanding a generative learning model of instruction: A case study of
elementary teacher planning. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 7(2), 95–122.
Osborne, R. and Wittrock, M. (1985) The generative learning model and its implications for science
education. Studies in Science Education. 12(1), 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268508559923
Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). The role of memory for past test in the under confidence with practice
effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 33(1), 238-
244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.238
Fiorella, L., and Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that
promote understanding. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707085.
Adeeko, P. A., Adeniji, S. M., Salman, M. F., and Fajemidagba, O. (2020). Generative Learning Model
and students’ retention in Probability Generative Learning Model (GLM) and senior school students’
retention in probability. ATBU Journal of Science Technology and Education. 8(1), 137–145.
Al Mutlaq, H. M. M. (2021). The effect of using generative learning strategy on the academic
achievement and mathematical thinking of primary school pupils. International Journal of Mathematics
and Statistics Studies. 9(1), 1–15.
Jaelani, A. (2021). SketchUp-aided generative learning in solid geometry: Does it affected students’
spatial abilities? Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1778(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
6596/1778/1/012039
Lee, N. H., Lee, J., and Wong, Z. Y. (2021). Preparing students for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
through mathematical learning. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics. 31(3), 321–356.
https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2021.31.3.321
Minarti, E. D., Wahyudin, W., and Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2021). How to train students’ mathematical
communication skills through generative learning?: An evaluation of circle material. JTAM (Jurnal
Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika). 5(2), 359–373.
Dewi, I. L. K., Zaenuri, Dwijanto, Mulyono, Waluya, S. B., and Rochmad. (2021). Conceptual
understanding and productive disposition in trigonometry through generative learning. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series. 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042050
Dianti, A., Yensy, N. A., and Rusdi, R. (2021). Improvement of student mathematics learning outcome
on polyhedra topic by applying generative learning model in the class. Journal of Physics: Conference
Series. 1731(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012045
Kosiret, A., Indiyah, F. H., and Wijayanti, D. A. (2021). The use of Generative Learning Model in
improving students’ understanding of mathematical concepts of Al-Azhar 19 Islamic High School.
International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education. 1(1), 16–26.
https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i1.6593
Hulukati, E., Pomalato, S. W. D., Hulukati, W., and Zakiyah, S. (2023). Developing students’
mathematical communication skill in junior high school with various level of mathematics achievement
through Generative Learning Model. British Journal of Teacher Education and Pedagogy. 2(1), 31–
37. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjtep.2023.2.1.5
Evi Faujiah, Yurniwati Yurniwati, and Gusti Yarmi. (2024). How to support the algebraic thinking
skills of elementary school students using the Generative Multi-Representation Learning Model
Modification Schema-Based instruction?. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia. 7(2), 2700–2712.
https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v7i2.9163
Faujiah, E., Yurniwati, Y., Ulfa, M., and Budiono. (2024). Optimizing algebraic thinking in elementary
students: Exploring the impact of generative learning. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma
Negara. 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37640/jip.v16i1.1927
Rahayu, R., Masrukhan, M., & Sugianto, S. (2018). Mathematics teaching using Generative Learning
Model with character building content aided by interactive learning media. Unnes Journal of
Mathematics Education Research. 8(1), 35-48.
Moma, L., Kusumah, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Dahlan, J. A. (2013). The enhancement of junior high
school students mathematical creative thinking abilities through Generative Learning. Mathematical
Theory and Modeling. 3(8), 146-157.
Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Maat, S. M. (2020). The effects of a discovery learning module on geometry
for improving students' mathematical reasoning skills, communication and self-confidence.
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 19(3), 214-228.
Nasution, I. S., & Nasution, S. (2023). Student critical thinking skills in the implementation of
discovery learning and inquiry-based learning. Indonesian Journal of Education and Mathematical
Science. 4(1), 1-6.
Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogeneity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical
competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1722.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108.
Panjaitan, M. A., & Suhendra, S. (2022). Model problem-based learning for improving student’s
mathematical competence: Systematic literature review. Mathematics Education Journal. 6(2), 118-
129. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v6i2.21462
Md Jais, N., and Hamid, A. H. A. (2019). Amalan kepimpinan multidimensi guru besar dan
hubungannya dengan komitmen guru program transformasi sekolah 2025 (TS25). International
Journal of Modern Education. 1(2), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.12002
Durach, C.F., Kembro, J., and Wieland, A. (2017). A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews
in supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 53(4), 67–85.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145
Shaffril, H. A.M, Samsuddin, S. F., and Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature
review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality and Quantity. 55, 1319–1346.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
Shaffril, H. A. M., Samah, A. A., Samsuddin, S. F., and Ali, Z. (2019). Mirror-mirror on the wall, what
climate change adaptation strategies are practiced by the Asian's fishermen of all?. Journal of cleaner
production. 232, 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.262
Md Idrus, N. and Maat, S. M. (2021). Sorotan literatur bersistematik: Komponen efikasi kendiri dalam
Pendidikan Matematik. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH). 6(1), 96 - 105.
https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i1.623
Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., and Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological
guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based
Healthcare.13(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.
Tamilchelvan, S., and Rashid, R. A. (2017). Being a Muslim gay man: A systematic review. Trames:
A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 21(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2017.3.05
Gusenbauer,M. and Haddaway, N.R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for
systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar PubMed and 26
other resources. Research Synthesis Methods. 11(2),181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Haddaway, N.R., Collins, A.M., Coughlin, D., and Kirk, S. (2015). The role of google scholar in
evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS ONE. 10(9), 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., and Linkman, S. (2009).
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–A systematic literature review. Information and
Software Technology. 51(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of
the Association for Information Systems. 37. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03743
Kraus, S., Breier, M. and Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review
in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal. 16(3), 1023–1042.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
Hu, B. Y., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Roberts, S. K., & Vitiello, G. (2021). The quality of teacher feedback
matters: Examining Chinese teachers’ use of feedback strategies in preschool math lessons. Teaching
and Teacher Education. 98, 103253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103253
McFeetors, P. J., Marynowski, R., and Candler, A. (2021). Generative unit assessment: Authenticity in
mathematics classroom assessment practices. Education Sciences. 11(7).
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070366
Sutrisno, H., and Kharisudin, I. (2020). Problem solving ability with mathematical modeling strategy
in term of mathematics self-efficacy on Generative Learning Model. Unnes Journal of Mathematics
Education. 9(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v9i1.35674
Kusairi, K., Syaiful, S., and Haryanto, H. (2020). Generative Learning Model in mathematics: A
solution to improve problem solving and creative thinking skill. Indonesian Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education. 3(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6378
Kirisci, N., Sak, U., and Karabacak, F. (2020). The effectiveness of the selective problem-solving model
on students’ mathematical creativity: A Solomon four-group research. Thinking Skills and Creativity.
38, 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100719
Jusniani, N., Setiawan, E., and Inayah, S. (2020). Secondary school students’ mathematical
communication through Think-Talk-Write (Ttw) learning model and interactive media. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series. 1477(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042039
Wardono, Rochmad, Uswatun, K., and Mariani, S. (2020). Comparison between generative learning
and discovery learning in improving written mathematical communication ability. International
Journal of Instruction. 13(3), 729–744. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13349a
Akmam, A., Afrizon, R., Koto, I., Setiawan, D., Hidayat, R., and Novitra, F. (2024). Integration of
cognitive conflict in generative learning modelto enhancing students’ creative thinking skills. Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 20(9).
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15026
Hsu, S. K., and Hsu, Y. (2024). Supporting young learners in learning Geometric Area concepts through
static versus dynamic representation and imagination strategies. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education. 23, 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10481-3
Moma, L., and Tamalene, H. (2023). Improving students’ high-level mathematical thinking skills
through generative learning models. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education
Research. 6(3), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v6i3.263
Wardono, W., & Mariani, S. (2015). The realistic scientific humanist learning with character education
to improve mathematics literacy based on PISA. International Journal of Education and Research.
3(1), 349-362.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 result in focus. Paris: OECD
Winardi, W., Wardono, W., & Dwijanto, D. (2018). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematika melalui
Model Missouri Mathematics project dengan pendekatan OpenEnded. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar
Nasional Matematika. 1, 162-169.
Wardono, W., & Kurniasih, A. W. (2015). peningkatan literasi matematika mahasiswa melalui
pembelajaran inovatif realistik e-learning edmodo bermuatan karakter cerdas kreatif mandiri. Kreano,
Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif. 6(1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i1.4978.
Anintya, Y. A., Pujiastuti, E., & Mashuri, M. (2017). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis
ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa kelas viii pada Model Pembelajaran Resourse Based Learning. Unnes
Journal of Mathematics Education. 6(1), 37-43.
Hendriansyah, I., Zainuddin, Z., and Mastuang, M. (2018). Penerapan Model Generatif dalam
pembelajaran Fisika untuk mengatasi hasil belajar dan miskonsepsi siswa. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan
Fisika. 6(3), 336. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v6i3.5289
Hadib, N. U. M., Hidayat, R., Zulkarnin, N., Azman, N., and Zunaidi, M. H. (2022). Computational
thinking in mathematics education among primary school students: A systematic literature review:
Pemikiran komputasional dalam pendidikan matematik dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah: Satu
tinjauan literatur sistematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia. 12(2), 22–38.
https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol12.2.2.2022