UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| A needs analysis was conducted to identify the current requirements and preferences of students for the development of a Circle Kit for Form 2 Mathematics topics. The research involved a random selection of secondary schools from Kedah, Perlis, and Johor, with 90 Mathematics teachers chosen through purposive sampling to serve as the study_s samples. Employing a quantitative approach, data were collected using the Needs Analysis Questionnaire (NAQ) as the survey instrument, and the data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed that 95.5% of the respondents acknowledged the need for a Circle Kit specifically tailored for Form 2 Mathematics. Moreover, a substantial majority, 75.4%, identified the Circle topic as the primary focus requiring attention in the development of the Circle Kit. Specifically, this study focuses on key aspects such as content, activities, assessment, and materials to optimise the effectiveness of the Circle Kit. In terms of content, 70.1% of teachers advocate for the inclusion of a comprehensive user guide to facilitate its use. For activities, 60.8% of teachers emphasise the importance of incorporating group tasks to foster student collaboration and teamwork. Regarding assessment, 62.4% support a flexible approach that integrates both individual and group evaluations. Lastly, 73.2% of teachers stress the significance of using hands-on materials to enhance learning experiences and increase student engagement. These findings will guide the design and implementation of the Circle Kit, ensuring it better supports Mathematics education. The development of the Circle Kit, specifically tailored for the Circle topic in Form 2 Mathematics, is crucial to improving teaching and learning outcomes. This study recommends that the design of the Circle Kit emphasise essential characteristics, including the integration of relevant content, engaging and interactive activities, the use of appropriate materials, and the incorporation of effective assessment methods. These elements are vital to fostering a comprehensive and dynamic learning experience for students.
Keywords: Circle, Form 2 Mathematics, Descriptive Statistics, Circle Kit |
| References |
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Buletin anjakan. Buleting Transformasi Pendidikan Malaysia – PPPM 2013-2025.
Radin, M., & Yasin, M. A. M. Z. (2018). Perlaksanaan pendidikan abad ke-21 di Malaysia: Satu tinjauan awal. Sains Humanika, 10(3-2), 1-6.
MOE. (2020). Buku Laporan Kebangsaan TIMSS 2019. Diperoleh daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/pemberitahuan/announcement/buku-laporan-kebangsaan-timss-2019
Foo, C. H., & Ng, E.C. S. (2022). Development of GeoGebra-Based Module to Enhance Students’ Understanding of Form Two Circles. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 10(2), 67-73.
Kariya, H. S. (2020). Faktor faktor yang mempengaruhi pencapaian akademik pelajar Politeknik METrO bentong Sarawak. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(4). 9-18.
Zainal, Matore, Musa & Hashim. (2020). Kesahan Kandungan Instrumen Pengukuran Tingkah Laku Inovatif Guru Menggunakan Kaedah Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan (CVR). Akademia, 90(3), 43-54.
Khairunisa Khali, Z., & Rosli, R. (2022). Amalan pengajaran guru matematik tambahan dari perspektif murid: Satu kajian kes. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 9(3), 45-58.
Wiryasa, I. N. (2023). Penerapan metod E diskusi keplompok berbantukan lembaran kerja siswa untuk meningkatkan minat dan prestasi belajar Pendidikan agama Hindu kelas viii Smpn 2 sekampung Udik. Widyalaya: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 88-92.
Saifi. S. N. S. A., Affendi, M., & Matore, E. M. (2020). Sorotan literatur bersistematik bagi efikasi kendiri pelajar terhadap matematik. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(12), 76-89.
Reza, S. M., & Mahmud, M. I. (2021). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) memperkukuh kefahaman pelajar dalam subjek matematik sekaligus meningkatkan persediaan pelajar menuju era revolusi industry 4.0, (Fakulti Pengajian Bahasa Utama, USM Malaysia, 2021), 26-40.
Ganesan, N., & Leong, K. N. (2020). The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software Geometer’s Sketchpad on Students’ Achievement in Topic Circle among Form Two Students. Malaysia Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8, 56-58.
Siang, E. N. & Hui, F. C. (2022). Pembinaan Modul Berasaskan Geogebra untuk Meningkatkan Kefahaman Murid bagi Topik Bulatan Tingkatan Dua, Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 10(2), 67-73.
Zuraida, R. L., Nancy, R., & Farah, R. N. (2019). Effectiveness of Using Circle Geometry (CG-Board) Strategy in Learning Circle Geometry towards Form Four Students’ Performance. American journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 3(1), 155-163.
Tan, S., Wijaya, T. T., Zou, L., & Hermita, N. (2020). Proving the Formula for the Area of a Circle using Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics Software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1693(1), 012052.
Uwase, U., & Effiong, I. A. (2023). Enhancing the teaching of basic concepts in circle geometry using elearning approach: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4(12), 416-422.
Richey, Rita. C., & James. D. Klien. (2014). Design and development research. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978/1-14614-3185-5_12
Ramli, N. S., & Mohd Tajudin, N. (2021). Analisis keperluan untuk membangunkan Modul Pembelajaran Berasaskan Challenge dalam Mempelajari Matematik bagi murid tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(5), 50-58.
Zaipul Bahari, F. A., & Saleh, S. (2023). Content Validation Procedure: Development of Problem-solving Skills Test (PSST): Prosedur Pengesahan Kandungan:Pembangunan Ujian Kemahiran Penyelesaian Masalah (PSST). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 13(1), 1-9.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education 7, 429. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Reza, S. M., & Mahmud, M. I. (2021). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) memperkukuh kefahaman pelajar dalam subjek matematik sekaligus meningkatkan persediaan pelajar menuju era revolusi industry 4.0. Fakulti Pengajian Bahasa Utama, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 26-40.
Hasegawa, M., Lack, S., & McCusker, G., (2021). A special issue on categorical algebras and computation in celebration of John Power’s 60th birthday, part I. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 31(7), 746-747.
Shridhar, K., Macina, J., El-Assady, M., Sinha, T., Kapur, M., & Sachan, M. (2022). Automatic generation of socratic subquestions for teaching math word problems. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2211.12835
Subramaniam, M., & Rosli, R. (2024). The use of teaching aids for circle topics among secondary school teachers. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 6(1), 45.
Uno, H. B., & Mohamad, N. (2022). Belajar dengan pendekatan PAILKEM: pembelajaran aktif, inovatif, lingkungan, kreatif, efektif, menarik. Bumi Aksara.
Ismail, Z., Abdullah, N., & Rizuan, N. (2022). Kesan sikap pelajar terhadap pembelajaran topik Bulatan dalam matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 12(1), 23-34.
Arbin, N., Wan Azlan, W. M. K., & Kamarudin, N. (2022). Development of the Isometric Trio Kit of Form Two Translations Topic. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 10(1), 22-31.
Jamaludin, M. A. A., Arbin, N., Kamarudin, N., & Hamzah, F. M. (2023). Pembinaan Kit Dolphin Jump Number Line bagi topik Pendaraban Integer Tingkatan Satu. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 13(2), 35-46. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |