UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| The comprehensibility of insurance policy documents is an important issue but often overlooked. The lack of comprehensibility of the policy can cause misunderstandings and even disputes between insurance providers and policyholders. In the realm of legal texts of which insurance policy is a part of, discourse markers play an important role in enhancing or impeding the comprehensibility of the contents. The role of discourse markers within insurance policies has not been extensively studied. Thus, there is a significant research gap in exploring how these linguistic elements contribute to the comprehensibility of insurance policies, ergo, affecting readers_ comprehension. The study employed a mixed-method approach of quantitative and qualitative data analysis to examine the use of discourse markers in insurance policy documents and how they contribute to the policy's comprehensibility. The quantitative analysis involved the frequency counts of the use and distribution of the discourse markers in the policy documents. The qualitative analysis involved the analysis of data from a semistructured interview that gauged the policyholders_ perceptions on their comprehension of the policy documents concerning the use of discourse markers. 839 discourse markers were identified based on six categories of discourse markers: contrastive, elaborative, inferential, temporal, conditional, and reference. Each category plays a specific role in shaping the narrative and ensuring the clarity of contractual details. The interview data indicate that familiar and common discourse markers could facilitate understanding, but complex and unfamiliar discourse markers might detract comprehension and readability. The findings pointed out that the challenges of understanding the legal documents are observable across various groups of policyholders. Insurers can resolve this by using more common and familiar discourse, making it more inclusive and comprehensible for all consumers.
Keywords: Insurance policies, discourse markers, readability, comprehensibility |
| References |
Alsaawi, A. (2022). Use of Discourse Markers among Senior University Students. Arab World English Journal, 13 (1) 161-172. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.11
Ariel, M. (1998). Pragmatic Operators. In Mey, J.L. The concise encyclopaedia of pragmatics. Elsevier. pp. 704–707.
Asprey, M. (2024). Plain Language for Lawyers. (5th Edition). Australia: Federation Press.
Berger, L. A. (1988). Word-of-mouth reputations in auto insurance markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 10(2), 225-234.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press.
Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell
Brockway, J. (2020). Most People Don’t Read Their Insurance Policies. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/most-people-dont-read-insurance-policies-jon-brockway
Cude, B. (2005). Insurance disclosures: An effective mechanism to increase consumers’ market power? Journal of Insurance Regulation, 24(2), 57-80.
Fischer, K. (ed.). (2006). Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier
Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5
Fraser, B. (2009). An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics, 1(2), 293-320. https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489818
Garner, B. A. (2011). Legal Writing in Plain English: A Text with Exercises. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gordon, J. (2016). Simplifying legal language: The readability of insurance policies. Journal of Legal Writing, 22(2), 121-145.
Grote, B. (1998). Representing temporal discourse markers for generation purposes. In Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers.
Hall, A. (2007). Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures? Linguist, 117. 149-174.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques and Applications. Routledge.
Huneety, A., Alkhawaldeh, A., Mashaqba, B. et al. (2023). The use of discourse markers in argumentative compositions by Jordanian EFL learners. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 41. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01525-0
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
Kimble, J. (1996). Writing for Dollars, Writing to Please: The Case for Plain Language in Business, Government, and Law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Knott, A. & Sanders, T. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: an exploration in two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 135-175.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers.
Kusumayati, L. D. (2020). The Use of Discourse Markers in Written Discourse by the Students at Aviation Polytechnic of Surabaya. E-Structural, 3(01), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.33633/es.v3i01.3757.
Lin, X., Bruhn, A., & William, J. (2019). Extending financial literacy to insurance literacy: A survey approach. Accounting & Finance, 59, 685-713. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 175 sec. 2B. 2014.
Linguistic Profiling for Professionals. (2018). How clear are your policy wording?, University of Notingham Press.
Olanrewaju, F.R., Oyedokun-Alli & Ademola, W. (2020). Interpreting and Markers in Nigerian Courtroom Discourse. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(3), 24-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.3p.24
Onorina, B. (2010). Discourse Markers as Sentence Openers in Legal English. European Integration - Realities and Perspectives Proceedings, 5, 250-253.
Östman, J. (1995). Pragmatic particles twenty years after. Anglicana Turkuensia, 14: 95-108.
Pontiaka, M., Kristina, D. & Setyaningsih, E. (2024). Exploring Discourse Markers Usage and Challenges in Writing Procedure Texts: A Study on Vocational Students. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 11(2), 433-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i2.5552
Pourkiani, M., Chegini, G. M., Yousefi, S., & Madahian, S. (2014). Service quality effect on satisfaction and word of mouth in the insurance industry. Management Science Letters, 4, 1773-1780.
Raputri, E., Pratama, H. & Hartono, R. (2022). Evaluating the Use of Discourse Markers in Selected English Education Journal Articles. English Education Journal, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.52252.
Redeker, G. (1991). Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29(6):1139-1172 https://doi.org /10.1515/ling.1991.29.6.1139
Redish, J. (2000). Readability Formulas Have Even More Limitations than Klare Discusses. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24(3), 132-137.
Riznanda, W. A. (2021). Discourse Markers in Tertiary Level Students’ Essay Writing: Ability and Problems. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 5(1), 01. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v5i1.1193
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scholman, M., Rohde, H., & Demberg, V. (2024). Facilitation of a lexical form or a discourse relation: Evidence from contrastive pairs of discourse markers. Glossa Psycholinguistics.
Schwarcz, D. (2010). Regulating insurance sales or selling insurance regulations? Against regulatory competition in insurance. Minnesota Law Review, 94, 1707-1788.
Schneiderová, A. (2013). Legal discourse markers. Journal of Modern Science, 19(4), 353-366.
Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse markers. Lingua, 107: 227-265.
Super Lawyers. (2023). Insurance claim denials: What you need to know. Super Lawyers. https://www.superlawyers.com/articles/insurance/insurance-claim-denials-what-you-need-to-know
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tanner, S. (2020). The Rhetorical Force of the Law: An Analysis of the Language, Genre and Structure of Legal Opinions. Phd. Thesis. Carnegie Mellon University. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/13154168.v1
Tennyson, S. (2011). Consumers’ insurance literacy: Evidence from survey data. Financial Service Review, 20, 165-179.
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal Language. University of Chicago Press.
Tiersma, P. (2008). The nature of legal language. In J. Gibbons & M. T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics (pp. 7–25). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5.03tie
Wagner, A., & Cheng, L. (2011). Reading Law Beyond the Words: Using Hermeneutics in Legal Text Analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 24(2), 237-252.
Ződi Z. (2019). The limits of plain legal language: understanding the comprehensible style in law. International Journal of Law in Context. 15(3):246-262. doi:10.1017/S1744552319000260
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |